Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology
Abstract This paper reports a case study that discusses issues related to the reconstruction of kinship terminology in Proto-Tupi, based on previous work by Araújo and Storto (2002) on the Arikém and Juruna subfamilies. It also presents the remaining kin terminology of the Karitiana language (Arikém...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
2019-04-01
|
| Series: | Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222019000100121&lng=en&tlng=en |
| _version_ | 1818159010804662272 |
|---|---|
| author | Luciana Storto |
| author_facet | Luciana Storto |
| author_sort | Luciana Storto |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract This paper reports a case study that discusses issues related to the reconstruction of kinship terminology in Proto-Tupi, based on previous work by Araújo and Storto (2002) on the Arikém and Juruna subfamilies. It also presents the remaining kin terminology of the Karitiana language (Arikém branch or subfamily) which was not discussed in the case study. Comparing Karitiana (Landin, 1989) and Juruna (Lima, 1995) kin terminology, Araújo and Storto (2002) have shown that some cognates can be found in the two languages and proposed that they reconstruct in Proto-Tupi. These authors claim that these reconstructed items indicate the following hypotheses: (1) the speakers of Proto-Tupi (4500 BP) had a Dravidian kinship system; (2) the speakers of Proto-Tupi had a kinship and naming system in which ego was equated with the paternal grandparent of the same sex as ego. Besides the 11 cognates discussed by Araújo and Storto (2002), we discuss the remaining 19 kin terms that form the Karitiana kinship system according to Landin (1989). |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T15:39:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8845c9fffde3428999c274303583b05a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2178-2547 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T15:39:11Z |
| publishDate | 2019-04-01 |
| publisher | Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas |
| spelling | doaj.art-8845c9fffde3428999c274303583b05a2022-12-22T00:59:52ZengMuseu Paraense Emílio GoeldiBoletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas2178-25472019-04-0114112113010.1590/1981.81222019000100008S1981-81222019000100121Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminologyLuciana StortoAbstract This paper reports a case study that discusses issues related to the reconstruction of kinship terminology in Proto-Tupi, based on previous work by Araújo and Storto (2002) on the Arikém and Juruna subfamilies. It also presents the remaining kin terminology of the Karitiana language (Arikém branch or subfamily) which was not discussed in the case study. Comparing Karitiana (Landin, 1989) and Juruna (Lima, 1995) kin terminology, Araújo and Storto (2002) have shown that some cognates can be found in the two languages and proposed that they reconstruct in Proto-Tupi. These authors claim that these reconstructed items indicate the following hypotheses: (1) the speakers of Proto-Tupi (4500 BP) had a Dravidian kinship system; (2) the speakers of Proto-Tupi had a kinship and naming system in which ego was equated with the paternal grandparent of the same sex as ego. Besides the 11 cognates discussed by Araújo and Storto (2002), we discuss the remaining 19 kin terms that form the Karitiana kinship system according to Landin (1989).http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222019000100121&lng=en&tlng=enKaritianaArikémJurunaTupiParentescoReconstrução |
| spellingShingle | Luciana Storto Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas Karitiana Arikém Juruna Tupi Parentesco Reconstrução |
| title | Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology |
| title_full | Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology |
| title_fullStr | Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology |
| title_full_unstemmed | Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology |
| title_short | Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology |
| title_sort | kin terms in karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of proto tupian kin terminology |
| topic | Karitiana Arikém Juruna Tupi Parentesco Reconstrução |
| url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222019000100121&lng=en&tlng=en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lucianastorto kintermsinkaritianaandhowtheymaycontributetothereconstructionofprototupiankinterminology |