Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images

Abstract Background The purpose of this work was to evaluate computable Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) radiomic features to classify breast masses on ultrasound B-mode images. Methods The database consisted of 206 consecutive lesions (144 benign and 62 malignant) proved by percut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eduardo Fleury, Karem Marcomini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-08-01
Series:European Radiology Experimental
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41747-019-0112-7
_version_ 1818429018388561920
author Eduardo Fleury
Karem Marcomini
author_facet Eduardo Fleury
Karem Marcomini
author_sort Eduardo Fleury
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The purpose of this work was to evaluate computable Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) radiomic features to classify breast masses on ultrasound B-mode images. Methods The database consisted of 206 consecutive lesions (144 benign and 62 malignant) proved by percutaneous biopsy in a prospective study approved by the local ethical committee. A radiologist manually delineated the contour of the lesions on greyscale images. We extracted the main ten radiomic features based on the BI-RADS lexicon and classified the lesions as benign or malignant using a bottom-up approach for five machine learning (ML) methods: multilayer perceptron (MLP), decision tree (DT), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). We performed a 10-fold cross validation for training and testing of all classifiers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used for providing the area under the curve with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results The classifier with the highest AUC at ROC analysis was SVM (AUC = 0.840, 95% CI 0.6667–0.9762), with 71.4% sensitivity (95% CI 0.6479–0.8616) and 76.9% specificity (95% CI 0.6148–0.8228). The best AUC for each method was 0.744 (95% CI 0.677–0.774) for DT, 0.818 (95% CI 0.6667–0.9444) for LDA, 0.811 (95% CI 0.710–0.892) for RF, and 0.806 (95% CI 0.677–0.839) for MLP. Lesion margin and orientation were the optimal features for all the machine learning methods. Conclusions ML can aid the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesion on ultrasound images using quantified BI-RADS descriptors. SVM provided the highest ROC-AUC (0.840).
first_indexed 2024-12-14T15:10:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-88546cdf1c814a608f9be14a37678bd6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2509-9280
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T15:10:51Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series European Radiology Experimental
spelling doaj.art-88546cdf1c814a608f9be14a37678bd62022-12-21T22:56:34ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Radiology Experimental2509-92802019-08-01311810.1186/s41747-019-0112-7Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound imagesEduardo Fleury0Karem Marcomini1Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Câncer (IBCC)USP São CarlosAbstract Background The purpose of this work was to evaluate computable Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) radiomic features to classify breast masses on ultrasound B-mode images. Methods The database consisted of 206 consecutive lesions (144 benign and 62 malignant) proved by percutaneous biopsy in a prospective study approved by the local ethical committee. A radiologist manually delineated the contour of the lesions on greyscale images. We extracted the main ten radiomic features based on the BI-RADS lexicon and classified the lesions as benign or malignant using a bottom-up approach for five machine learning (ML) methods: multilayer perceptron (MLP), decision tree (DT), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). We performed a 10-fold cross validation for training and testing of all classifiers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used for providing the area under the curve with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results The classifier with the highest AUC at ROC analysis was SVM (AUC = 0.840, 95% CI 0.6667–0.9762), with 71.4% sensitivity (95% CI 0.6479–0.8616) and 76.9% specificity (95% CI 0.6148–0.8228). The best AUC for each method was 0.744 (95% CI 0.677–0.774) for DT, 0.818 (95% CI 0.6667–0.9444) for LDA, 0.811 (95% CI 0.710–0.892) for RF, and 0.806 (95% CI 0.677–0.839) for MLP. Lesion margin and orientation were the optimal features for all the machine learning methods. Conclusions ML can aid the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesion on ultrasound images using quantified BI-RADS descriptors. SVM provided the highest ROC-AUC (0.840).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41747-019-0112-7Breast neoplasmsMachine LearningNeural networks (computer)Support vector machineUltrasonography
spellingShingle Eduardo Fleury
Karem Marcomini
Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images
European Radiology Experimental
Breast neoplasms
Machine Learning
Neural networks (computer)
Support vector machine
Ultrasonography
title Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images
title_full Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images
title_fullStr Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images
title_full_unstemmed Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images
title_short Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images
title_sort performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using bi rads radiomic features on ultrasound images
topic Breast neoplasms
Machine Learning
Neural networks (computer)
Support vector machine
Ultrasonography
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41747-019-0112-7
work_keys_str_mv AT eduardofleury performanceofmachinelearningsoftwaretoclassifybreastlesionsusingbiradsradiomicfeaturesonultrasoundimages
AT karemmarcomini performanceofmachinelearningsoftwaretoclassifybreastlesionsusingbiradsradiomicfeaturesonultrasoundimages