The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the South African Population: A Scoping Review

To determine the performance and reliability of diagnostic tests for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection in South Africa, we conducted a scoping review to identify published studies undertaken in the English language from March 2020 to August 2022 that evaluated the performance of antigen- an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natasha Samsunder, Nikita Devnarain, Aida Sivro, Ayesha B. M. Kharsany
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/8/12/514
_version_ 1797379236428775424
author Natasha Samsunder
Nikita Devnarain
Aida Sivro
Ayesha B. M. Kharsany
author_facet Natasha Samsunder
Nikita Devnarain
Aida Sivro
Ayesha B. M. Kharsany
author_sort Natasha Samsunder
collection DOAJ
description To determine the performance and reliability of diagnostic tests for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection in South Africa, we conducted a scoping review to identify published studies undertaken in the English language from March 2020 to August 2022 that evaluated the performance of antigen- and antibody-based diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 in South Africa. We identified 17 relevant peer-reviewed articles; six reported on SARS-CoV-2 gene and/or antigen detection whilst 11 reported on antibody detection. Of the SARS-CoV-2 gene and/or antigen-based tests, sensitivity ranged from 40% to 100%, whilst for the antibody-based tests, sensitivity ranged from 13% to 100%. All tests evaluated were highly dependent on the stage of infection and the timing of sample collection. This scoping review demonstrated that no single SARS-CoV-2 gene and/or antigen- or antibody-based assay was sufficiently sensitive and specific simultaneously. The sensitivity of the tests was highly dependent on the timing of sample collection with respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the case of SARS-CoV-2 gene and/or antigen detection, the earlier the collection of samples, the greater the sensitivity, while antibody detection tests showed better sensitivity using samples from later stages of infection.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:19:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-885c0cc02d7244268c2f23a1c3edc224
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2414-6366
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:19:15Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
spelling doaj.art-885c0cc02d7244268c2f23a1c3edc2242023-12-22T14:46:27ZengMDPI AGTropical Medicine and Infectious Disease2414-63662023-12-0181251410.3390/tropicalmed8120514The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the South African Population: A Scoping ReviewNatasha Samsunder0Nikita Devnarain1Aida Sivro2Ayesha B. M. Kharsany3Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Durban 4013, South AfricaCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Durban 4013, South AfricaCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Durban 4013, South AfricaCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Durban 4013, South AfricaTo determine the performance and reliability of diagnostic tests for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection in South Africa, we conducted a scoping review to identify published studies undertaken in the English language from March 2020 to August 2022 that evaluated the performance of antigen- and antibody-based diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 in South Africa. We identified 17 relevant peer-reviewed articles; six reported on SARS-CoV-2 gene and/or antigen detection whilst 11 reported on antibody detection. Of the SARS-CoV-2 gene and/or antigen-based tests, sensitivity ranged from 40% to 100%, whilst for the antibody-based tests, sensitivity ranged from 13% to 100%. All tests evaluated were highly dependent on the stage of infection and the timing of sample collection. This scoping review demonstrated that no single SARS-CoV-2 gene and/or antigen- or antibody-based assay was sufficiently sensitive and specific simultaneously. The sensitivity of the tests was highly dependent on the timing of sample collection with respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the case of SARS-CoV-2 gene and/or antigen detection, the earlier the collection of samples, the greater the sensitivity, while antibody detection tests showed better sensitivity using samples from later stages of infection.https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/8/12/514SARS-CoV-2SARS-CoV-2 gene/sdiagnostic testingRT-PCRantigenantibody
spellingShingle Natasha Samsunder
Nikita Devnarain
Aida Sivro
Ayesha B. M. Kharsany
The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the South African Population: A Scoping Review
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
SARS-CoV-2
SARS-CoV-2 gene/s
diagnostic testing
RT-PCR
antigen
antibody
title The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the South African Population: A Scoping Review
title_full The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the South African Population: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the South African Population: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the South African Population: A Scoping Review
title_short The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the South African Population: A Scoping Review
title_sort performance of diagnostic tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 sars cov 2 in the south african population a scoping review
topic SARS-CoV-2
SARS-CoV-2 gene/s
diagnostic testing
RT-PCR
antigen
antibody
url https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/8/12/514
work_keys_str_mv AT natashasamsunder theperformanceofdiagnostictestsforsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2sarscov2inthesouthafricanpopulationascopingreview
AT nikitadevnarain theperformanceofdiagnostictestsforsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2sarscov2inthesouthafricanpopulationascopingreview
AT aidasivro theperformanceofdiagnostictestsforsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2sarscov2inthesouthafricanpopulationascopingreview
AT ayeshabmkharsany theperformanceofdiagnostictestsforsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2sarscov2inthesouthafricanpopulationascopingreview
AT natashasamsunder performanceofdiagnostictestsforsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2sarscov2inthesouthafricanpopulationascopingreview
AT nikitadevnarain performanceofdiagnostictestsforsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2sarscov2inthesouthafricanpopulationascopingreview
AT aidasivro performanceofdiagnostictestsforsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2sarscov2inthesouthafricanpopulationascopingreview
AT ayeshabmkharsany performanceofdiagnostictestsforsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirus2sarscov2inthesouthafricanpopulationascopingreview