Societal economic burden and determinants of costs for atopic dermatitis

Abstract Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease while the economic burden of AD by severity is not adequately understood. Objective To estimate the societal economic burden and to identify cost determinants of AD. Methods In this population‐based, controlled cohort s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gustaf Ortsäter, Anna De Geer, Alexander Rieem Dun, Kirk Geale, Ingrid Lindberg, Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen, Laura B. vonKobyletzki, Alexandra Metsini, Dan Henrohn, Petra Neregård, Amy Cha, Joseph C. Cappelleri, William Romero, Maureen P. Neary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-12-01
Series:JEADV Clinical Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.74
_version_ 1797987940225253376
author Gustaf Ortsäter
Anna De Geer
Alexander Rieem Dun
Kirk Geale
Ingrid Lindberg
Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen
Laura B. vonKobyletzki
Alexandra Metsini
Dan Henrohn
Petra Neregård
Amy Cha
Joseph C. Cappelleri
William Romero
Maureen P. Neary
author_facet Gustaf Ortsäter
Anna De Geer
Alexander Rieem Dun
Kirk Geale
Ingrid Lindberg
Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen
Laura B. vonKobyletzki
Alexandra Metsini
Dan Henrohn
Petra Neregård
Amy Cha
Joseph C. Cappelleri
William Romero
Maureen P. Neary
author_sort Gustaf Ortsäter
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease while the economic burden of AD by severity is not adequately understood. Objective To estimate the societal economic burden and to identify cost determinants of AD. Methods In this population‐based, controlled cohort study in Sweden, patients with AD were identified through diagnosis codes in primary or secondary care or by dispensed medications using administrative healthcare registers. A reference cohort without AD was randomly selected from the general population. Healthcare costs (primary/secondary care visits and dispensed medication) and indirect costs (care for sick children and long‐term sick leave for adults) were calculated annually. AD patients were stratified by age (paediatric [age < 12], adolescent [12 ≤ age < 18] or adult [age ≥ 18]), and severity (mild‐to‐moderate [M2M] or severe AD) and matched to the reference cohort. Results Compared with controls, the annual mean per‐patient direct healthcare costs in the first year following diagnosis were €941 and €1259 higher in paediatric patients with M2M and severe AD, respectively. In the first year following diagnosis, the mean indirect cost for care of sick children was €69 and €78 higher per patient in M2M and severe AD, respectively. In adolescents with M2M and severe AD, direct healthcare costs were €816 and €1260 higher, respectively. In adults, healthcare costs were €1583 and €2963 higher in patients with M2M and severe AD, respectively and indirect costs were €148 and €263 higher compared with controls. Management of comorbid medical conditions was an important driver of incremental healthcare costs. Total incremental societal economic burden for AD was €351 and €96 million higher in patients with M2M and severe AD, respectively, compared to controls. Conclusion AD is associated with a significant societal economic burden primarily driven by the cost burden of M2M AD due to the high prevalence of this population. Regardless of severity level, management of non‐AD comorbidities is a major driver of total costs.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:54:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-885f76a34f1541309327f1bf780ec2de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2768-6566
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:54:51Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series JEADV Clinical Practice
spelling doaj.art-885f76a34f1541309327f1bf780ec2de2022-12-22T04:35:57ZengWileyJEADV Clinical Practice2768-65662022-12-011432634310.1002/jvc2.74Societal economic burden and determinants of costs for atopic dermatitisGustaf Ortsäter0Anna De Geer1Alexander Rieem Dun2Kirk Geale3Ingrid Lindberg4Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen5Laura B. vonKobyletzki6Alexandra Metsini7Dan Henrohn8Petra Neregård9Amy Cha10Joseph C. Cappelleri11William Romero12Maureen P. Neary13Quantify Research Stockholm SwedenPfizer AB Sollentuna SwedenQuantify Research Stockholm SwedenQuantify Research Stockholm SwedenQuantify Research Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Bispebjerg Hospital University of Copenhagen Hellerup DenmarkDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital Lund University Malmo SwedenInstitute of Medical Sciences University of Örebro Örebro SwedenPfizer AB Sollentuna SwedenPfizer AB Sollentuna SwedenPfizer Inc. New York New York USAPfizer Inc. New York New York USAInflammation & Immunology Pfizer Ltd. London UKPfizer Inc. New York New York USAAbstract Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease while the economic burden of AD by severity is not adequately understood. Objective To estimate the societal economic burden and to identify cost determinants of AD. Methods In this population‐based, controlled cohort study in Sweden, patients with AD were identified through diagnosis codes in primary or secondary care or by dispensed medications using administrative healthcare registers. A reference cohort without AD was randomly selected from the general population. Healthcare costs (primary/secondary care visits and dispensed medication) and indirect costs (care for sick children and long‐term sick leave for adults) were calculated annually. AD patients were stratified by age (paediatric [age < 12], adolescent [12 ≤ age < 18] or adult [age ≥ 18]), and severity (mild‐to‐moderate [M2M] or severe AD) and matched to the reference cohort. Results Compared with controls, the annual mean per‐patient direct healthcare costs in the first year following diagnosis were €941 and €1259 higher in paediatric patients with M2M and severe AD, respectively. In the first year following diagnosis, the mean indirect cost for care of sick children was €69 and €78 higher per patient in M2M and severe AD, respectively. In adolescents with M2M and severe AD, direct healthcare costs were €816 and €1260 higher, respectively. In adults, healthcare costs were €1583 and €2963 higher in patients with M2M and severe AD, respectively and indirect costs were €148 and €263 higher compared with controls. Management of comorbid medical conditions was an important driver of incremental healthcare costs. Total incremental societal economic burden for AD was €351 and €96 million higher in patients with M2M and severe AD, respectively, compared to controls. Conclusion AD is associated with a significant societal economic burden primarily driven by the cost burden of M2M AD due to the high prevalence of this population. Regardless of severity level, management of non‐AD comorbidities is a major driver of total costs.https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.74atopic dermatitiseconomic burdeneczemaepidemiologyhealthcare costsindirect costs
spellingShingle Gustaf Ortsäter
Anna De Geer
Alexander Rieem Dun
Kirk Geale
Ingrid Lindberg
Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen
Laura B. vonKobyletzki
Alexandra Metsini
Dan Henrohn
Petra Neregård
Amy Cha
Joseph C. Cappelleri
William Romero
Maureen P. Neary
Societal economic burden and determinants of costs for atopic dermatitis
JEADV Clinical Practice
atopic dermatitis
economic burden
eczema
epidemiology
healthcare costs
indirect costs
title Societal economic burden and determinants of costs for atopic dermatitis
title_full Societal economic burden and determinants of costs for atopic dermatitis
title_fullStr Societal economic burden and determinants of costs for atopic dermatitis
title_full_unstemmed Societal economic burden and determinants of costs for atopic dermatitis
title_short Societal economic burden and determinants of costs for atopic dermatitis
title_sort societal economic burden and determinants of costs for atopic dermatitis
topic atopic dermatitis
economic burden
eczema
epidemiology
healthcare costs
indirect costs
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.74
work_keys_str_mv AT gustafortsater societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT annadegeer societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT alexanderrieemdun societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT kirkgeale societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT ingridlindberg societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT jacobpontoppidanthyssen societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT laurabvonkobyletzki societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT alexandrametsini societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT danhenrohn societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT petraneregard societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT amycha societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT josephccappelleri societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT williamromero societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis
AT maureenpneary societaleconomicburdenanddeterminantsofcostsforatopicdermatitis