It’s Time to Make More Room for Program Evaluation in the Education Doctorate Program

This essay highlights the value of an applied methodology course in program evaluation in the education doctorate program by exploring several benefits that it offers to enhance a doctoral student’s ability to solve complex problems of practice. Observations and recommendations are made based on de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jessica A. Marotta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2023-09-01
Series:Impacting Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://impactinged.pitt.edu/ojs/ImpactingEd/article/view/335
_version_ 1797692268023382016
author Jessica A. Marotta
author_facet Jessica A. Marotta
author_sort Jessica A. Marotta
collection DOAJ
description This essay highlights the value of an applied methodology course in program evaluation in the education doctorate program by exploring several benefits that it offers to enhance a doctoral student’s ability to solve complex problems of practice. Observations and recommendations are made based on designing and teaching two cohorts of EdD students in a program evaluation course. Improvement science is referenced throughout to highlight how the two may complement each other, not to place a higher value on one or the other. How and where program evaluation and improvement science appear to have possible areas of overlap, along with a brief overview of the major differences, are discussed. The author maintains that both program evaluation and improvement constitute a tremendous capacity to provide the ideas, tools, and approaches to prepare students to be the change agents they hope to aspire to be in their present and future roles as scholarly practitioners.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T02:25:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-886077961a5743d29cddef605577c0b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2472-5889
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T02:25:11Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
record_format Article
series Impacting Education
spelling doaj.art-886077961a5743d29cddef605577c0b72023-09-05T15:30:13ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghImpacting Education2472-58892023-09-018410.5195/ie.2023.335It’s Time to Make More Room for Program Evaluation in the Education Doctorate ProgramJessica A. Marotta0Marymount University This essay highlights the value of an applied methodology course in program evaluation in the education doctorate program by exploring several benefits that it offers to enhance a doctoral student’s ability to solve complex problems of practice. Observations and recommendations are made based on designing and teaching two cohorts of EdD students in a program evaluation course. Improvement science is referenced throughout to highlight how the two may complement each other, not to place a higher value on one or the other. How and where program evaluation and improvement science appear to have possible areas of overlap, along with a brief overview of the major differences, are discussed. The author maintains that both program evaluation and improvement constitute a tremendous capacity to provide the ideas, tools, and approaches to prepare students to be the change agents they hope to aspire to be in their present and future roles as scholarly practitioners. https://impactinged.pitt.edu/ojs/ImpactingEd/article/view/335education doctorateprogram evaluationimprovement scienceCarnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED)
spellingShingle Jessica A. Marotta
It’s Time to Make More Room for Program Evaluation in the Education Doctorate Program
Impacting Education
education doctorate
program evaluation
improvement science
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED)
title It’s Time to Make More Room for Program Evaluation in the Education Doctorate Program
title_full It’s Time to Make More Room for Program Evaluation in the Education Doctorate Program
title_fullStr It’s Time to Make More Room for Program Evaluation in the Education Doctorate Program
title_full_unstemmed It’s Time to Make More Room for Program Evaluation in the Education Doctorate Program
title_short It’s Time to Make More Room for Program Evaluation in the Education Doctorate Program
title_sort it s time to make more room for program evaluation in the education doctorate program
topic education doctorate
program evaluation
improvement science
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED)
url https://impactinged.pitt.edu/ojs/ImpactingEd/article/view/335
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicaamarotta itstimetomakemoreroomforprogramevaluationintheeducationdoctorateprogram