Pressure Orientation-Dependent Recovery of 3D-Printed PLA Objects with Varying Infill Degree

Poly(lactic acid) is not only one of the most often used materials for 3D printing via fused deposition modeling (FDM), but also a shape-memory polymer. This means that objects printed from PLA can, to a certain extent, be deformed and regenerate their original shape automatically when they are heat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guido Ehrmann, Andrea Ehrmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Polymers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/8/1275
_version_ 1797537731681714176
author Guido Ehrmann
Andrea Ehrmann
author_facet Guido Ehrmann
Andrea Ehrmann
author_sort Guido Ehrmann
collection DOAJ
description Poly(lactic acid) is not only one of the most often used materials for 3D printing via fused deposition modeling (FDM), but also a shape-memory polymer. This means that objects printed from PLA can, to a certain extent, be deformed and regenerate their original shape automatically when they are heated to a moderate temperature of about 60–100 °C. It is important to note that pure PLA cannot restore broken bonds, so that it is necessary to find structures which can take up large forces by deformation without full breaks. Here we report on the continuation of previous tests on 3D-printed cubes with different infill patterns and degrees, now investigating the influence of the orientation of the applied pressure on the recovery properties. We find that for the applied gyroid pattern, indentation on the front parallel to the layers gives the worst recovery due to nearly full layer separation, while indentation on the front perpendicular to the layers or diagonal gives significantly better results. Pressing from the top, either diagonal or parallel to an edge, interestingly leads to a different residual strain than pressing from front, with indentation on top always firstly leading to an expansion towards the indenter after the first few quasi-static load tests. To quantitatively evaluate these results, new measures are suggested which could be adopted by other groups working on shape-memory polymers.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:19:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-886238dff45644ec872ba4c364a2ae6e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4360
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:19:31Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Polymers
spelling doaj.art-886238dff45644ec872ba4c364a2ae6e2023-11-21T15:35:05ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602021-04-01138127510.3390/polym13081275Pressure Orientation-Dependent Recovery of 3D-Printed PLA Objects with Varying Infill DegreeGuido Ehrmann0Andrea Ehrmann1Virtual Institute of Applied Research on Advanced Materials (VIARAM)Virtual Institute of Applied Research on Advanced Materials (VIARAM)Poly(lactic acid) is not only one of the most often used materials for 3D printing via fused deposition modeling (FDM), but also a shape-memory polymer. This means that objects printed from PLA can, to a certain extent, be deformed and regenerate their original shape automatically when they are heated to a moderate temperature of about 60–100 °C. It is important to note that pure PLA cannot restore broken bonds, so that it is necessary to find structures which can take up large forces by deformation without full breaks. Here we report on the continuation of previous tests on 3D-printed cubes with different infill patterns and degrees, now investigating the influence of the orientation of the applied pressure on the recovery properties. We find that for the applied gyroid pattern, indentation on the front parallel to the layers gives the worst recovery due to nearly full layer separation, while indentation on the front perpendicular to the layers or diagonal gives significantly better results. Pressing from the top, either diagonal or parallel to an edge, interestingly leads to a different residual strain than pressing from front, with indentation on top always firstly leading to an expansion towards the indenter after the first few quasi-static load tests. To quantitatively evaluate these results, new measures are suggested which could be adopted by other groups working on shape-memory polymers.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/8/1275polylactic acid (PLA)fused deposition modeling (FDM)three-point bending testinfill parametersinfill densityshape-memory properties
spellingShingle Guido Ehrmann
Andrea Ehrmann
Pressure Orientation-Dependent Recovery of 3D-Printed PLA Objects with Varying Infill Degree
Polymers
polylactic acid (PLA)
fused deposition modeling (FDM)
three-point bending test
infill parameters
infill density
shape-memory properties
title Pressure Orientation-Dependent Recovery of 3D-Printed PLA Objects with Varying Infill Degree
title_full Pressure Orientation-Dependent Recovery of 3D-Printed PLA Objects with Varying Infill Degree
title_fullStr Pressure Orientation-Dependent Recovery of 3D-Printed PLA Objects with Varying Infill Degree
title_full_unstemmed Pressure Orientation-Dependent Recovery of 3D-Printed PLA Objects with Varying Infill Degree
title_short Pressure Orientation-Dependent Recovery of 3D-Printed PLA Objects with Varying Infill Degree
title_sort pressure orientation dependent recovery of 3d printed pla objects with varying infill degree
topic polylactic acid (PLA)
fused deposition modeling (FDM)
three-point bending test
infill parameters
infill density
shape-memory properties
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/8/1275
work_keys_str_mv AT guidoehrmann pressureorientationdependentrecoveryof3dprintedplaobjectswithvaryinginfilldegree
AT andreaehrmann pressureorientationdependentrecoveryof3dprintedplaobjectswithvaryinginfilldegree