Voices lost: where is the person in evaluating a palliative approach to care?

Person-centredness is a cornerstone to a palliative approach to care. However, there is a risk that a person-centred perspective is lost in how a palliative approach is evaluated. We explored the extent to which evaluations of a palliative approach are consistent with its person-centred ethical stan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard Sawatzky, Pat Porterfield, Erin Donald, Carolyn Tayler, Kelli Stajduhar, Sally Thorne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-08-01
Series:Palliative Care and Social Practice
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231193041
_version_ 1827856714850893824
author Richard Sawatzky
Pat Porterfield
Erin Donald
Carolyn Tayler
Kelli Stajduhar
Sally Thorne
author_facet Richard Sawatzky
Pat Porterfield
Erin Donald
Carolyn Tayler
Kelli Stajduhar
Sally Thorne
author_sort Richard Sawatzky
collection DOAJ
description Person-centredness is a cornerstone to a palliative approach to care. However, there is a risk that a person-centred perspective is lost in how a palliative approach is evaluated. We explored the extent to which evaluations of a palliative approach are consistent with its person-centred ethical stance. Using a narrative review approach, we critically reflected on how the experiences, priorities and concerns of patients and family are represented, or not represented, in evaluations of a palliative approach. We were guided by the following questions: (1) What types of outcomes and indicators are commonly used to evaluate a palliative approach? (2) Whose perspectives are represented in current evaluations of a palliative approach? And (3) What are the foci of evaluation in this body of research? We observed that the evaluations of a palliative approach are commonly based on indicators of its implementation and predominantly reflect the perspectives of healthcare providers and healthcare systems, rather than patients or family. Although evaluations focused on healthcare providers and systems are important for integrating a palliative approach, there is concern that the essence of person-centredness is lost when the perspectives of patients and families about their healthcare needs, outcomes and experiences are not consistently measured as the ultimate goal of care. There is a need for more emphasis on evaluation practices that value person-centred outcomes, in addition to outcomes oriented to the needs of healthcare providers and systems.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:28:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-88680ab36c8a4374998fb61464656e83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2632-3524
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:28:48Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Palliative Care and Social Practice
spelling doaj.art-88680ab36c8a4374998fb61464656e832023-08-29T17:05:43ZengSAGE PublishingPalliative Care and Social Practice2632-35242023-08-011710.1177/26323524231193041Voices lost: where is the person in evaluating a palliative approach to care?Richard SawatzkyPat PorterfieldErin DonaldCarolyn TaylerKelli StajduharSally ThornePerson-centredness is a cornerstone to a palliative approach to care. However, there is a risk that a person-centred perspective is lost in how a palliative approach is evaluated. We explored the extent to which evaluations of a palliative approach are consistent with its person-centred ethical stance. Using a narrative review approach, we critically reflected on how the experiences, priorities and concerns of patients and family are represented, or not represented, in evaluations of a palliative approach. We were guided by the following questions: (1) What types of outcomes and indicators are commonly used to evaluate a palliative approach? (2) Whose perspectives are represented in current evaluations of a palliative approach? And (3) What are the foci of evaluation in this body of research? We observed that the evaluations of a palliative approach are commonly based on indicators of its implementation and predominantly reflect the perspectives of healthcare providers and healthcare systems, rather than patients or family. Although evaluations focused on healthcare providers and systems are important for integrating a palliative approach, there is concern that the essence of person-centredness is lost when the perspectives of patients and families about their healthcare needs, outcomes and experiences are not consistently measured as the ultimate goal of care. There is a need for more emphasis on evaluation practices that value person-centred outcomes, in addition to outcomes oriented to the needs of healthcare providers and systems.https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231193041
spellingShingle Richard Sawatzky
Pat Porterfield
Erin Donald
Carolyn Tayler
Kelli Stajduhar
Sally Thorne
Voices lost: where is the person in evaluating a palliative approach to care?
Palliative Care and Social Practice
title Voices lost: where is the person in evaluating a palliative approach to care?
title_full Voices lost: where is the person in evaluating a palliative approach to care?
title_fullStr Voices lost: where is the person in evaluating a palliative approach to care?
title_full_unstemmed Voices lost: where is the person in evaluating a palliative approach to care?
title_short Voices lost: where is the person in evaluating a palliative approach to care?
title_sort voices lost where is the person in evaluating a palliative approach to care
url https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231193041
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsawatzky voiceslostwhereisthepersoninevaluatingapalliativeapproachtocare
AT patporterfield voiceslostwhereisthepersoninevaluatingapalliativeapproachtocare
AT erindonald voiceslostwhereisthepersoninevaluatingapalliativeapproachtocare
AT carolyntayler voiceslostwhereisthepersoninevaluatingapalliativeapproachtocare
AT kellistajduhar voiceslostwhereisthepersoninevaluatingapalliativeapproachtocare
AT sallythorne voiceslostwhereisthepersoninevaluatingapalliativeapproachtocare