Complex journeys and methodological responses to engaging in self-study in a rural comprehensive university

The context in which self-study research is conducted is sometimes complex, affecting the manner in which related data is gathered and interpreted. This article comprises collaboration between three students and two supervisors. It shares methodological choices made by graduate students and supervi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thenjiwe Meyiwa, Paul Mokhele, Nkosinathi Sotshangane, Sizakele Makhanya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2014-06-01
Series:Perspectives in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://196.255.246.28/index.php/pie/article/view/1865
_version_ 1797258024288518144
author Thenjiwe Meyiwa
Paul Mokhele
Nkosinathi Sotshangane
Sizakele Makhanya
author_facet Thenjiwe Meyiwa
Paul Mokhele
Nkosinathi Sotshangane
Sizakele Makhanya
author_sort Thenjiwe Meyiwa
collection DOAJ
description The context in which self-study research is conducted is sometimes complex, affecting the manner in which related data is gathered and interpreted. This article comprises collaboration between three students and two supervisors. It shares methodological choices made by graduate students and supervisors of a rural university at which, selfstudy research was introduced in 2010. As individuals, and as a collective, we reflect on the reasons and decisions for adopting certain research approaches towards selfstudy: the ways in which such decisions are negotiated in conceptualising, conducting, transcribing, and supervising graduate research. While self-reflexive data-collection approaches (mainly journal writing and storytelling) guide our research, the manner in which data is analysed and presented to the wider university community is influenced by expectations and by the context of the university. We, therefore, use innovative approaches differing from self-study research, speaking more to the challenges and expectations of a rural context. We further reflect on the implications such choices have for our research and the work produced – where knowledge shifts are executed, methodologies are re-defined and social change is desired.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T22:46:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-886d8ced953e483ab238a982bb137aad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0258-2236
2519-593X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:46:57Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher University of the Free State
record_format Article
series Perspectives in Education
spelling doaj.art-886d8ced953e483ab238a982bb137aad2024-03-18T11:11:22ZengUniversity of the Free StatePerspectives in Education0258-22362519-593X2014-06-0132210.38140/pie.v32i2.1865Complex journeys and methodological responses to engaging in self-study in a rural comprehensive universityThenjiwe Meyiwa0Paul Mokhele1Nkosinathi Sotshangane2Sizakele Makhanya3Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) & Durban University of TechnologyWalter Sisulu UniversityWalter Sisulu UniversityMangosuthu University of Technology The context in which self-study research is conducted is sometimes complex, affecting the manner in which related data is gathered and interpreted. This article comprises collaboration between three students and two supervisors. It shares methodological choices made by graduate students and supervisors of a rural university at which, selfstudy research was introduced in 2010. As individuals, and as a collective, we reflect on the reasons and decisions for adopting certain research approaches towards selfstudy: the ways in which such decisions are negotiated in conceptualising, conducting, transcribing, and supervising graduate research. While self-reflexive data-collection approaches (mainly journal writing and storytelling) guide our research, the manner in which data is analysed and presented to the wider university community is influenced by expectations and by the context of the university. We, therefore, use innovative approaches differing from self-study research, speaking more to the challenges and expectations of a rural context. We further reflect on the implications such choices have for our research and the work produced – where knowledge shifts are executed, methodologies are re-defined and social change is desired. http://196.255.246.28/index.php/pie/article/view/1865Rural universityself-studysocial transformationreflexive ubuntu
spellingShingle Thenjiwe Meyiwa
Paul Mokhele
Nkosinathi Sotshangane
Sizakele Makhanya
Complex journeys and methodological responses to engaging in self-study in a rural comprehensive university
Perspectives in Education
Rural university
self-study
social transformation
reflexive ubuntu
title Complex journeys and methodological responses to engaging in self-study in a rural comprehensive university
title_full Complex journeys and methodological responses to engaging in self-study in a rural comprehensive university
title_fullStr Complex journeys and methodological responses to engaging in self-study in a rural comprehensive university
title_full_unstemmed Complex journeys and methodological responses to engaging in self-study in a rural comprehensive university
title_short Complex journeys and methodological responses to engaging in self-study in a rural comprehensive university
title_sort complex journeys and methodological responses to engaging in self study in a rural comprehensive university
topic Rural university
self-study
social transformation
reflexive ubuntu
url http://196.255.246.28/index.php/pie/article/view/1865
work_keys_str_mv AT thenjiwemeyiwa complexjourneysandmethodologicalresponsestoengaginginselfstudyinaruralcomprehensiveuniversity
AT paulmokhele complexjourneysandmethodologicalresponsestoengaginginselfstudyinaruralcomprehensiveuniversity
AT nkosinathisotshangane complexjourneysandmethodologicalresponsestoengaginginselfstudyinaruralcomprehensiveuniversity
AT sizakelemakhanya complexjourneysandmethodologicalresponsestoengaginginselfstudyinaruralcomprehensiveuniversity