Relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patients

Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between PSS, PH, FCP and QoL of oncology patients. Methods In this descriptive‐correlational study, 340 oncology patients were selected with convenience sampling method from the hospitals in Tehran 2018–2019. Data were collecte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatemeh Haj Hashemi, Foroozan Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh, Parastoo Oujian, Bahram Mofid, Maryam Bazargan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-07-01
Series:Nursing Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.808
_version_ 1798001626035781632
author Fatemeh Haj Hashemi
Foroozan Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh
Parastoo Oujian
Bahram Mofid
Maryam Bazargan
author_facet Fatemeh Haj Hashemi
Foroozan Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh
Parastoo Oujian
Bahram Mofid
Maryam Bazargan
author_sort Fatemeh Haj Hashemi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between PSS, PH, FCP and QoL of oncology patients. Methods In this descriptive‐correlational study, 340 oncology patients were selected with convenience sampling method from the hospitals in Tehran 2018–2019. Data were collected using, “PSS,” “PH,” “FCP” and “European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ‐C30.” Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS21 and Amos. Results The direct effect and the total effect of PSS and FCP on QoL were significant (p < .001), but their indirect effect was not significant (p > .05) and the effect of PH on QoL was not significant (p = .96). The Root Mean Squares of Error Approximations (RMSEA), Non‐Normed Fit Index (NNFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) were estimated 0.07, 0.97, 0.98 and 0.91, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:39:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-889bc4884272424cb1a9a2a8ea1df8fd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-1058
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:39:06Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Nursing Open
spelling doaj.art-889bc4884272424cb1a9a2a8ea1df8fd2022-12-22T04:25:52ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582021-07-01841704171110.1002/nop2.808Relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patientsFatemeh Haj Hashemi0Foroozan Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh1Parastoo Oujian2Bahram Mofid3Maryam Bazargan4Student Research Committee, School of Nursing & Midwifery Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran IranDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing and Management School of Nursing & Midwifery Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran IranDepartment of Pediatric Nursing School of Nursing & Midwifery Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran IranCancer Research Center Department of Radiation Oncology Shohada‐e‐Tajrish Medical Center School of Medicine Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran IranCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences Flinders University Adelaide SA AustraliaAbstract Aim The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between PSS, PH, FCP and QoL of oncology patients. Methods In this descriptive‐correlational study, 340 oncology patients were selected with convenience sampling method from the hospitals in Tehran 2018–2019. Data were collected using, “PSS,” “PH,” “FCP” and “European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ‐C30.” Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS21 and Amos. Results The direct effect and the total effect of PSS and FCP on QoL were significant (p < .001), but their indirect effect was not significant (p > .05) and the effect of PH on QoL was not significant (p = .96). The Root Mean Squares of Error Approximations (RMSEA), Non‐Normed Fit Index (NNFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) were estimated 0.07, 0.97, 0.98 and 0.91, respectively.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.808cancercommunicationnursingoncologypatientsquality of life
spellingShingle Fatemeh Haj Hashemi
Foroozan Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh
Parastoo Oujian
Bahram Mofid
Maryam Bazargan
Relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patients
Nursing Open
cancer
communication
nursing
oncology
patients
quality of life
title Relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patients
title_full Relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patients
title_fullStr Relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patients
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patients
title_short Relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patients
title_sort relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patients
topic cancer
communication
nursing
oncology
patients
quality of life
url https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.808
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehhajhashemi relationshipbetweenperceivedsocialsupportandpsychologicalhardinesswithfamilycommunicationpatternsandqualityoflifeofoncologypatients
AT foroozanatashzadehshoorideh relationshipbetweenperceivedsocialsupportandpsychologicalhardinesswithfamilycommunicationpatternsandqualityoflifeofoncologypatients
AT parastoooujian relationshipbetweenperceivedsocialsupportandpsychologicalhardinesswithfamilycommunicationpatternsandqualityoflifeofoncologypatients
AT bahrammofid relationshipbetweenperceivedsocialsupportandpsychologicalhardinesswithfamilycommunicationpatternsandqualityoflifeofoncologypatients
AT maryambazargan relationshipbetweenperceivedsocialsupportandpsychologicalhardinesswithfamilycommunicationpatternsandqualityoflifeofoncologypatients