A Unitary Schema for Arguments by Analogy
Following a Toulmian account of argument analysis and evaluation, I offer a general unitary schema for, so called, deductive and inductive types of analogical arguments. This schema is able to explain why certain analogical arguments can be said to be deductive, and yet, also defeasible.
Main Author: | Lilian Bermejo-Luque |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2012-03-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3332 |
Similar Items
-
A Unitary Schema for Arguments by Analogy
by: Lilian Bermejo-Luque
Published: (2012-03-01) -
Deduction without Dogmas:The Case of Moral Analogical Argumentation
by: Lilian Bermejo-Luque
Published: (2014-09-01) -
Deduction without Dogmas:The Case of Moral Analogical Argumentation
by: Lilian Bermejo-Luque
Published: (2014-09-01) -
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments
by: Yanlin Liao
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Analogy, Similarity, and the Periodic Table of Arguments
by: Wagemans Jean H. M.
Published: (2018-09-01)