Comparison of Definitive Radiotherapy in the Young-Elderly and Elderly with Clinical Localized Prostate Cancer

Introduction:This study aimed to investigate the survival, treatment-related toxicities, and prognostic factors in the elderly (≥65) with prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT). Patients divided into two groups as young-old (65-74 years) and old (over 75 years) were examined.Metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Berrin İnanç, Özlem Mermut, Begüm Ökten, Özlem Beşikçi, Ebru Tuncay, Caner Aktaş
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2021-11-01
Series:İstanbul Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access: http://istanbulmedicaljournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparison-of-definitive-radiotherapy-in-the-young/49718
_version_ 1828029235030130688
author Berrin İnanç
Özlem Mermut
Begüm Ökten
Özlem Beşikçi
Ebru Tuncay
Caner Aktaş
author_facet Berrin İnanç
Özlem Mermut
Begüm Ökten
Özlem Beşikçi
Ebru Tuncay
Caner Aktaş
author_sort Berrin İnanç
collection DOAJ
description Introduction:This study aimed to investigate the survival, treatment-related toxicities, and prognostic factors in the elderly (≥65) with prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT). Patients divided into two groups as young-old (65-74 years) and old (over 75 years) were examined.Methods:A total of 178 patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive RT were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic factors for survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), biochemical recurrence-free survival (BFS), and treatment-related toxicities were analyzed.Results:Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), last PSA value, and Charlson comorbidity score (5-6) were significantly different between the two groups (p=0.001, p=0.004, and p=0.012, respectively). The elderly showed high pretreatment PSA, last PSA value, and Charlson comorbidity score (5-6). None of the other treatment or patient characteristics differed significantly between the groups. The median follow-up time was 68 months (range: 12-116 months) for the young-elderly. The 5-year overall survival (OS), BFS, and MFS were 86.4%, 91.5%, and 92.8%, respectively, in the young-elderly. Median follow-up time in the elderly patients was 60 months (range: 7-118 months) and 5-year OS, MFS, and BFS rates were 79.6%, 93.1%, and 93.4%, respectively. No statistical difference was found when the OS, BFS, and MFS were evaluated in 5 years in both groups. The multivariate analysis revealed that high radiation doses (76 Gy and ≥78 Gy) and high T-stage (T3-4) was a significant prognostic factor for the BFS in all patients (p=0.013, p=0.007, and p=0.026, respectively). The presence of high-risk patients in the risk stratification was borderline significant for the BFS (p=0.051). Acute hematological toxicity, such as leucopenia (38%), and late toxicity, such as rectal bleeding (10%), were frequently observed in the elderly.Conclusion:No differences were found in the OS, BFS, and MFS between the two groups. High radiation doses and high T-stage was found as a prognostic factor for the BFS in all patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T14:06:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-88b99b250e4240c0b16fc4e6ae999f87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2619-9793
2148-094X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T14:06:41Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series İstanbul Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-88b99b250e4240c0b16fc4e6ae999f872023-02-15T16:09:56ZengGalenos Yayineviİstanbul Medical Journal2619-97932148-094X2021-11-0122432633110.4274/imj.galenos.2021.2900013049054Comparison of Definitive Radiotherapy in the Young-Elderly and Elderly with Clinical Localized Prostate CancerBerrin İnanç0Özlem Mermut1Begüm Ökten2Özlem Beşikçi3Ebru Tuncay4Caner Aktaş5 University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiation Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiation Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiation Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiation Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiation Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiation Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey Introduction:This study aimed to investigate the survival, treatment-related toxicities, and prognostic factors in the elderly (≥65) with prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT). Patients divided into two groups as young-old (65-74 years) and old (over 75 years) were examined.Methods:A total of 178 patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive RT were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic factors for survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), biochemical recurrence-free survival (BFS), and treatment-related toxicities were analyzed.Results:Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), last PSA value, and Charlson comorbidity score (5-6) were significantly different between the two groups (p=0.001, p=0.004, and p=0.012, respectively). The elderly showed high pretreatment PSA, last PSA value, and Charlson comorbidity score (5-6). None of the other treatment or patient characteristics differed significantly between the groups. The median follow-up time was 68 months (range: 12-116 months) for the young-elderly. The 5-year overall survival (OS), BFS, and MFS were 86.4%, 91.5%, and 92.8%, respectively, in the young-elderly. Median follow-up time in the elderly patients was 60 months (range: 7-118 months) and 5-year OS, MFS, and BFS rates were 79.6%, 93.1%, and 93.4%, respectively. No statistical difference was found when the OS, BFS, and MFS were evaluated in 5 years in both groups. The multivariate analysis revealed that high radiation doses (76 Gy and ≥78 Gy) and high T-stage (T3-4) was a significant prognostic factor for the BFS in all patients (p=0.013, p=0.007, and p=0.026, respectively). The presence of high-risk patients in the risk stratification was borderline significant for the BFS (p=0.051). Acute hematological toxicity, such as leucopenia (38%), and late toxicity, such as rectal bleeding (10%), were frequently observed in the elderly.Conclusion:No differences were found in the OS, BFS, and MFS between the two groups. High radiation doses and high T-stage was found as a prognostic factor for the BFS in all patients. http://istanbulmedicaljournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparison-of-definitive-radiotherapy-in-the-young/49718 radiotherapyagedsurvival
spellingShingle Berrin İnanç
Özlem Mermut
Begüm Ökten
Özlem Beşikçi
Ebru Tuncay
Caner Aktaş
Comparison of Definitive Radiotherapy in the Young-Elderly and Elderly with Clinical Localized Prostate Cancer
İstanbul Medical Journal
radiotherapy
aged
survival
title Comparison of Definitive Radiotherapy in the Young-Elderly and Elderly with Clinical Localized Prostate Cancer
title_full Comparison of Definitive Radiotherapy in the Young-Elderly and Elderly with Clinical Localized Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of Definitive Radiotherapy in the Young-Elderly and Elderly with Clinical Localized Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Definitive Radiotherapy in the Young-Elderly and Elderly with Clinical Localized Prostate Cancer
title_short Comparison of Definitive Radiotherapy in the Young-Elderly and Elderly with Clinical Localized Prostate Cancer
title_sort comparison of definitive radiotherapy in the young elderly and elderly with clinical localized prostate cancer
topic radiotherapy
aged
survival
url http://istanbulmedicaljournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparison-of-definitive-radiotherapy-in-the-young/49718
work_keys_str_mv AT berrininanc comparisonofdefinitiveradiotherapyintheyoungelderlyandelderlywithclinicallocalizedprostatecancer
AT ozlemmermut comparisonofdefinitiveradiotherapyintheyoungelderlyandelderlywithclinicallocalizedprostatecancer
AT begumokten comparisonofdefinitiveradiotherapyintheyoungelderlyandelderlywithclinicallocalizedprostatecancer
AT ozlembesikci comparisonofdefinitiveradiotherapyintheyoungelderlyandelderlywithclinicallocalizedprostatecancer
AT ebrutuncay comparisonofdefinitiveradiotherapyintheyoungelderlyandelderlywithclinicallocalizedprostatecancer
AT caneraktas comparisonofdefinitiveradiotherapyintheyoungelderlyandelderlywithclinicallocalizedprostatecancer