Justifiability and Animal Research in Health: Can Democratisation Help Resolve Difficulties?
Current animal research ethics frameworks emphasise consequentialist ethics through cost-benefit or harm-benefit analysis. However, these ethical frameworks along with institutional animal ethics approval processes cannot satisfactorily decide when a given potential benefit is outweighed by costs to...
Main Author: | Shaun Yon-Seng Khoo |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Animals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/8/2/28 |
Similar Items
-
Reviewing the Review: A Pilot Study of the Ethical Review Process of Animal Research in Sweden
by: Svea Jörgensen, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Emotions and Ethical Decision-Making in Animal Ethics Committees
by: Elisabeth Tjärnström, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Necessary, but Not Sufficient. The Benefit Concept in the Project Evaluation of Animal Research in the Context of Directive 2010/63/EU
by: Matthias Eggel, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01) -
Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution?
by: Nielsen, Birte L., et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
Critical Analysis of Assessment Studies of the Animal Ethics Review Process
by: Orsolya Varga
Published: (2013-09-01)