Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance based on the Australian Consensus Guidelines: a health economic modelling study

Abstract Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest increasing cause of cancer death in Australia. A recent Australian consensus guidelines recommended HCC surveillance for cirrhotic patients and non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients at gender and age specific cut-offs. A co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anh Le Tuan Nguyen, Lei Si, John S Lubel, Nicholas Shackel, Kwang Chien Yee, Mark Wilson, Jane Bradshaw, Kerry Hardy, Andrew John Palmer, Christopher Leigh Blizzard, Barbara de Graaff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09360-4
_version_ 1797841156970643456
author Anh Le Tuan Nguyen
Lei Si
John S Lubel
Nicholas Shackel
Kwang Chien Yee
Mark Wilson
Jane Bradshaw
Kerry Hardy
Andrew John Palmer
Christopher Leigh Blizzard
Barbara de Graaff
author_facet Anh Le Tuan Nguyen
Lei Si
John S Lubel
Nicholas Shackel
Kwang Chien Yee
Mark Wilson
Jane Bradshaw
Kerry Hardy
Andrew John Palmer
Christopher Leigh Blizzard
Barbara de Graaff
author_sort Anh Le Tuan Nguyen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest increasing cause of cancer death in Australia. A recent Australian consensus guidelines recommended HCC surveillance for cirrhotic patients and non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients at gender and age specific cut-offs. A cost-effectiveness model was then developed to assess surveillance strategies in Australia. Methods A microsimulation model was used to evaluate three strategies: biannual ultrasound, biannual ultrasound with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and no formal surveillance for patients having one of the conditions: non-cirrhotic CHB, compensated cirrhosis or decompensated cirrhosis. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses as well as scenario and threshold analyses were conducted to account for uncertainties: including exclusive surveillance of CHB, compensated cirrhosis or decompensated cirrhosis populations; impact of obesity on ultrasound sensitivity; real-world adherence rate; and different cohort’s ranges of ages. Results Sixty HCC surveillance scenarios were considered for the baseline population. The ultrasound + AFP strategy was the most cost-effective with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) compared to no surveillance falling below the willingness-to-pay threshold of A$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) at all age ranges. Ultrasound alone was also cost-effective, but the strategy was dominated by ultrasound + AFP. Surveillance was cost-effective in the compensated and decompensated cirrhosis populations alone (ICERs < $30,000), but not cost-effective in the CHB population (ICERs > $100,000). Obesity could decrease the diagnostic performance of ultrasound, which in turn, reduce the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound ± AFP, but the strategies remained cost-effective. Conclusions HCC surveillance based on Australian recommendations using biannual ultrasound ± AFP was cost-effective.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:26:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-88c307713f7e441c97586d9ef824669d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:26:31Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-88c307713f7e441c97586d9ef824669d2023-04-23T11:12:39ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632023-04-0123111510.1186/s12913-023-09360-4Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance based on the Australian Consensus Guidelines: a health economic modelling studyAnh Le Tuan Nguyen0Lei Si1John S Lubel2Nicholas Shackel3Kwang Chien Yee4Mark Wilson5Jane Bradshaw6Kerry Hardy7Andrew John Palmer8Christopher Leigh Blizzard9Barbara de Graaff10Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of TasmaniaSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney UniversityAlfred HealthUniversity of New South WalesSchool of Medicine, University of TasmaniaSchool of Medicine, University of TasmaniaRoyal Hobart HospitalRoyal Hobart HospitalMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of TasmaniaMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of TasmaniaMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of TasmaniaAbstract Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest increasing cause of cancer death in Australia. A recent Australian consensus guidelines recommended HCC surveillance for cirrhotic patients and non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients at gender and age specific cut-offs. A cost-effectiveness model was then developed to assess surveillance strategies in Australia. Methods A microsimulation model was used to evaluate three strategies: biannual ultrasound, biannual ultrasound with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and no formal surveillance for patients having one of the conditions: non-cirrhotic CHB, compensated cirrhosis or decompensated cirrhosis. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses as well as scenario and threshold analyses were conducted to account for uncertainties: including exclusive surveillance of CHB, compensated cirrhosis or decompensated cirrhosis populations; impact of obesity on ultrasound sensitivity; real-world adherence rate; and different cohort’s ranges of ages. Results Sixty HCC surveillance scenarios were considered for the baseline population. The ultrasound + AFP strategy was the most cost-effective with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) compared to no surveillance falling below the willingness-to-pay threshold of A$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) at all age ranges. Ultrasound alone was also cost-effective, but the strategy was dominated by ultrasound + AFP. Surveillance was cost-effective in the compensated and decompensated cirrhosis populations alone (ICERs < $30,000), but not cost-effective in the CHB population (ICERs > $100,000). Obesity could decrease the diagnostic performance of ultrasound, which in turn, reduce the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound ± AFP, but the strategies remained cost-effective. Conclusions HCC surveillance based on Australian recommendations using biannual ultrasound ± AFP was cost-effective.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09360-4Hepatocellular carcinomaSurveillanceCost-effectivenessUltrasoundAlpha-fetoprotein
spellingShingle Anh Le Tuan Nguyen
Lei Si
John S Lubel
Nicholas Shackel
Kwang Chien Yee
Mark Wilson
Jane Bradshaw
Kerry Hardy
Andrew John Palmer
Christopher Leigh Blizzard
Barbara de Graaff
Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance based on the Australian Consensus Guidelines: a health economic modelling study
BMC Health Services Research
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Surveillance
Cost-effectiveness
Ultrasound
Alpha-fetoprotein
title Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance based on the Australian Consensus Guidelines: a health economic modelling study
title_full Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance based on the Australian Consensus Guidelines: a health economic modelling study
title_fullStr Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance based on the Australian Consensus Guidelines: a health economic modelling study
title_full_unstemmed Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance based on the Australian Consensus Guidelines: a health economic modelling study
title_short Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance based on the Australian Consensus Guidelines: a health economic modelling study
title_sort hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance based on the australian consensus guidelines a health economic modelling study
topic Hepatocellular carcinoma
Surveillance
Cost-effectiveness
Ultrasound
Alpha-fetoprotein
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09360-4
work_keys_str_mv AT anhletuannguyen hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy
AT leisi hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy
AT johnslubel hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy
AT nicholasshackel hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy
AT kwangchienyee hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy
AT markwilson hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy
AT janebradshaw hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy
AT kerryhardy hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy
AT andrewjohnpalmer hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy
AT christopherleighblizzard hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy
AT barbaradegraaff hepatocellularcarcinomasurveillancebasedontheaustralianconsensusguidelinesahealtheconomicmodellingstudy