Prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of sinus-lifting procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla. This retrospective chart review examined consecutive patients with tooth/teeth loss in the posterior maxilla between 2008 and 2012 treated with sinus lift, w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ceyda Ozçakır Tomruk, Mehmet Kemal Sençift, Gonca Duygu Capar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-01-01
Series:Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2015.1102610
_version_ 1818339944566882304
author Ceyda Ozçakır Tomruk
Mehmet Kemal Sençift
Gonca Duygu Capar
author_facet Ceyda Ozçakır Tomruk
Mehmet Kemal Sençift
Gonca Duygu Capar
author_sort Ceyda Ozçakır Tomruk
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of sinus-lifting procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla. This retrospective chart review examined consecutive patients with tooth/teeth loss in the posterior maxilla between 2008 and 2012 treated with sinus lift, when needed, and implant insertion. Demographic variables, health status, residual alveolar bone height, augmentation types, the implant position, diameter and height, and implant failure, prosthesis types, and the marginal bone loss were recorded. The study included 302 patients at a mean age of 5.2 years, who received a total of 609 dental implants. A total of 380 (62.3%) implants were inserted in native areas, 203 (33.3%) ones in external sinus-lifted areas and 26 (4.4%) ones in internal lifted areas. The survival rate in native or internal lifted areas were 100% and 95.6% in external sinus lifted ones (10 implant failures/203 implants). Almost half of the implants were examined radiologically with a mean duration of 30 months and the mean marginal bone loss was 0.64 ± 1.2 mm. The results showed that the survival rates of native bone and the internal sinus lifting were slightly higher than that of external sinus lifting. Implants placed with sinus augmentation exhibited more marginal bone loss than implants in native bone.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:35:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-88d37aef4533486694703be8424169e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1310-2818
1314-3530
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:35:03Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
spelling doaj.art-88d37aef4533486694703be8424169e22022-12-21T23:40:04ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBiotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment1310-28181314-35302016-01-0130113413910.1080/13102818.2015.11026101102610Prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxillaCeyda Ozçakır Tomruk0Mehmet Kemal Sençift1Gonca Duygu Capar2Yeditepe UniversityYeditepe UniversityTrakya UniversityThe aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of sinus-lifting procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla. This retrospective chart review examined consecutive patients with tooth/teeth loss in the posterior maxilla between 2008 and 2012 treated with sinus lift, when needed, and implant insertion. Demographic variables, health status, residual alveolar bone height, augmentation types, the implant position, diameter and height, and implant failure, prosthesis types, and the marginal bone loss were recorded. The study included 302 patients at a mean age of 5.2 years, who received a total of 609 dental implants. A total of 380 (62.3%) implants were inserted in native areas, 203 (33.3%) ones in external sinus-lifted areas and 26 (4.4%) ones in internal lifted areas. The survival rate in native or internal lifted areas were 100% and 95.6% in external sinus lifted ones (10 implant failures/203 implants). Almost half of the implants were examined radiologically with a mean duration of 30 months and the mean marginal bone loss was 0.64 ± 1.2 mm. The results showed that the survival rates of native bone and the internal sinus lifting were slightly higher than that of external sinus lifting. Implants placed with sinus augmentation exhibited more marginal bone loss than implants in native bone.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2015.1102610Dental implantsnative boneposterior maxillasinus augmentationsurvival rate
spellingShingle Ceyda Ozçakır Tomruk
Mehmet Kemal Sençift
Gonca Duygu Capar
Prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla
Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
Dental implants
native bone
posterior maxilla
sinus augmentation
survival rate
title Prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla
title_full Prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla
title_fullStr Prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla
title_short Prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla
title_sort prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla
topic Dental implants
native bone
posterior maxilla
sinus augmentation
survival rate
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2015.1102610
work_keys_str_mv AT ceydaozcakırtomruk prevalenceofsinusfloorelevationproceduresandsurvivalratesofimplantsplacedintheposteriormaxilla
AT mehmetkemalsencift prevalenceofsinusfloorelevationproceduresandsurvivalratesofimplantsplacedintheposteriormaxilla
AT goncaduygucapar prevalenceofsinusfloorelevationproceduresandsurvivalratesofimplantsplacedintheposteriormaxilla