Cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background We compared cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring, in the clinical setting of ear-nose-throat surgery. Methods One hundred twenty adult patients were randomized to four groups. In groups SEVO and SEVO+ anes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timea Bocskai, Csaba Loibl, Zoltan Vamos, Gabor Woth, Tihamer Molnar, Lajos Bogar, Laszlo Lujber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-018-0563-z
_version_ 1818336997074272256
author Timea Bocskai
Csaba Loibl
Zoltan Vamos
Gabor Woth
Tihamer Molnar
Lajos Bogar
Laszlo Lujber
author_facet Timea Bocskai
Csaba Loibl
Zoltan Vamos
Gabor Woth
Tihamer Molnar
Lajos Bogar
Laszlo Lujber
author_sort Timea Bocskai
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background We compared cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring, in the clinical setting of ear-nose-throat surgery. Methods One hundred twenty adult patients were randomized to four groups. In groups SEVO and SEVO+ anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, in group SEVO+ with additional bispectral index (BIS) and train-of-four (TOF) monitoring. In groups PROP and PROP+ anesthesia was maintained with propofol, in group PROP+ with additional BIS and TOF monitoring. Results Total cost of anesthesia per hour was greater in group SEVO+ compared to SEVO [€ 19.95(8.53) vs. 12.15(5.32), p <  0.001], and in group PROP+ compared to PROP (€ 22.11(8.08) vs. 13.23(4.23), p <  0.001]. Time to extubation was shorter in group SEVO+ compared to SEVO [11.1(4.7) vs. 14.5(3.9) min, p = 0.002], and in PROP+ compared to PROP [12.6(5.4) vs. 15.2(4.7) min, p <  0.001]. Postoperatively, arterial blood pressure returned to its initial values sooner in groups SEVO+ and PROP+. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that the use of BIS and TOF monitoring decreased the total cost of anesthesia drugs and hastened postoperative recovery. However, in our circumstances, these were associated with higher disposables costs. Detailed cost analysis and further investigations are needed to identify patient populations who would benefit most from additional monitoring. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02920749. Retrospectively registered (date of registration September 2016).
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:48:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-88e4524f91bb44f7bbf40e52bd418801
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2253
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:48:12Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-88e4524f91bb44f7bbf40e52bd4188012022-12-21T23:41:25ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532018-07-011811810.1186/s12871-018-0563-zCost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring: a prospective, randomized controlled trialTimea Bocskai0Csaba Loibl1Zoltan Vamos2Gabor Woth3Tihamer Molnar4Lajos Bogar5Laszlo Lujber6Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pécs, Medical SchoolDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pécs, Medical SchoolDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pécs, Medical SchoolDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pécs, Medical SchoolDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pécs, Medical SchoolDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pécs, Medical SchoolDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pécs, Medical SchoolAbstract Background We compared cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring, in the clinical setting of ear-nose-throat surgery. Methods One hundred twenty adult patients were randomized to four groups. In groups SEVO and SEVO+ anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, in group SEVO+ with additional bispectral index (BIS) and train-of-four (TOF) monitoring. In groups PROP and PROP+ anesthesia was maintained with propofol, in group PROP+ with additional BIS and TOF monitoring. Results Total cost of anesthesia per hour was greater in group SEVO+ compared to SEVO [€ 19.95(8.53) vs. 12.15(5.32), p <  0.001], and in group PROP+ compared to PROP (€ 22.11(8.08) vs. 13.23(4.23), p <  0.001]. Time to extubation was shorter in group SEVO+ compared to SEVO [11.1(4.7) vs. 14.5(3.9) min, p = 0.002], and in PROP+ compared to PROP [12.6(5.4) vs. 15.2(4.7) min, p <  0.001]. Postoperatively, arterial blood pressure returned to its initial values sooner in groups SEVO+ and PROP+. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that the use of BIS and TOF monitoring decreased the total cost of anesthesia drugs and hastened postoperative recovery. However, in our circumstances, these were associated with higher disposables costs. Detailed cost analysis and further investigations are needed to identify patient populations who would benefit most from additional monitoring. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02920749. Retrospectively registered (date of registration September 2016).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-018-0563-zAnesthesiaPatient safetyCostBispectral indexTrain-of-four
spellingShingle Timea Bocskai
Csaba Loibl
Zoltan Vamos
Gabor Woth
Tihamer Molnar
Lajos Bogar
Laszlo Lujber
Cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia
Patient safety
Cost
Bispectral index
Train-of-four
title Cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_sort cost effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Anesthesia
Patient safety
Cost
Bispectral index
Train-of-four
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-018-0563-z
work_keys_str_mv AT timeabocskai costeffectivenessofanesthesiamaintainedwithsevofluraneorpropofolwithandwithoutadditionalmonitoringaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT csabaloibl costeffectivenessofanesthesiamaintainedwithsevofluraneorpropofolwithandwithoutadditionalmonitoringaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zoltanvamos costeffectivenessofanesthesiamaintainedwithsevofluraneorpropofolwithandwithoutadditionalmonitoringaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gaborwoth costeffectivenessofanesthesiamaintainedwithsevofluraneorpropofolwithandwithoutadditionalmonitoringaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tihamermolnar costeffectivenessofanesthesiamaintainedwithsevofluraneorpropofolwithandwithoutadditionalmonitoringaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lajosbogar costeffectivenessofanesthesiamaintainedwithsevofluraneorpropofolwithandwithoutadditionalmonitoringaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT laszlolujber costeffectivenessofanesthesiamaintainedwithsevofluraneorpropofolwithandwithoutadditionalmonitoringaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial