Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures

Abstract Background As the two most prevalent refractive surgeries in China, there is a substantial number of patients who have undergone Femtosecond Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) procedures. However, there is still limited knowledge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liangpin Li, Liyun Yuan, Kun Yang, Yanan Wu, Xia Hua, Yan Wang, Xiaoyong Yuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-10-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03164-0
_version_ 1797577384954691584
author Liangpin Li
Liyun Yuan
Kun Yang
Yanan Wu
Xia Hua
Yan Wang
Xiaoyong Yuan
author_facet Liangpin Li
Liyun Yuan
Kun Yang
Yanan Wu
Xia Hua
Yan Wang
Xiaoyong Yuan
author_sort Liangpin Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background As the two most prevalent refractive surgeries in China, there is a substantial number of patients who have undergone Femtosecond Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) procedures. However, there is still limited knowledge regarding the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for these patients with a history of FS-LASIK or SMILE. Methods A total of 100 eyes from 50 postoperative refractive surgery patients were included in this prospective cohort study, with 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone FS-LASIK and 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone SMILE. We utilized a theoretical surgical model to simulate the IOL implantation process in postoperative FS-LASIK and SMILE patients. Subsequently, we performed comprehensive biological measurements both before and after the surgeries, encompassing demographic information, corneal biometric parameters, and axial length. Various formulas, including the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula, as a baseline, were employed to calculate IOL power for the patients. Results The Barrett True K (BTK) formula, demonstrated an mean absolute error (AE) within 0.5 D for both FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (0.28 ± 0.25 D and 0.36 ± 0.24 D, respectively). Notably, the FS-LASIK group showed 82% of results differing by less than 0.25 D compared to preoperative BUII results. The Barrett True K No History (BTKNH) formula, which also incorporates measured posterior corneal curvature, performed similarly to BTK in both groups. Additionally, the Masket formula, relying on refractive changes based on empirical experience, displayed promising potential for IOL calculations in SMILE patients compared with BTK (p = 0.411). Conclusion The study reveals the accuracy and stability of the BTK and BTKNH formulas for IOL power calculations in myopic FS-LASIK/SMILE patients. Moreover, the Masket formula shows encouraging results in SMILE patients. These findings contribute to enhancing the predictability and success of IOL power calculations in patients with a history of refractive surgery, providing valuable insights for clinical practice. Further research and larger sample sizes are warranted to validate and optimize the identified formulas for better patient outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:07:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-88e6e87b813b4588b32b057d1fa2ddc2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2415
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:07:28Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-88e6e87b813b4588b32b057d1fa2ddc22023-11-19T12:45:21ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152023-10-012311910.1186/s12886-023-03164-0Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE proceduresLiangpin Li0Liyun Yuan1Kun Yang2Yanan Wu3Xia Hua4Yan Wang5Xiaoyong Yuan6Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical UniversitySchool of Medicine, Nankai UniversityTianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Institute, Tianjin Eye HospitalTianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Institute, Tianjin Eye HospitalTianjin Aier Eye Hospital, Tianjin UniversityClinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical UniversityClinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical UniversityAbstract Background As the two most prevalent refractive surgeries in China, there is a substantial number of patients who have undergone Femtosecond Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) procedures. However, there is still limited knowledge regarding the selection of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for these patients with a history of FS-LASIK or SMILE. Methods A total of 100 eyes from 50 postoperative refractive surgery patients were included in this prospective cohort study, with 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone FS-LASIK and 25 individuals (50 eyes) having undergone SMILE. We utilized a theoretical surgical model to simulate the IOL implantation process in postoperative FS-LASIK and SMILE patients. Subsequently, we performed comprehensive biological measurements both before and after the surgeries, encompassing demographic information, corneal biometric parameters, and axial length. Various formulas, including the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula, as a baseline, were employed to calculate IOL power for the patients. Results The Barrett True K (BTK) formula, demonstrated an mean absolute error (AE) within 0.5 D for both FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (0.28 ± 0.25 D and 0.36 ± 0.24 D, respectively). Notably, the FS-LASIK group showed 82% of results differing by less than 0.25 D compared to preoperative BUII results. The Barrett True K No History (BTKNH) formula, which also incorporates measured posterior corneal curvature, performed similarly to BTK in both groups. Additionally, the Masket formula, relying on refractive changes based on empirical experience, displayed promising potential for IOL calculations in SMILE patients compared with BTK (p = 0.411). Conclusion The study reveals the accuracy and stability of the BTK and BTKNH formulas for IOL power calculations in myopic FS-LASIK/SMILE patients. Moreover, the Masket formula shows encouraging results in SMILE patients. These findings contribute to enhancing the predictability and success of IOL power calculations in patients with a history of refractive surgery, providing valuable insights for clinical practice. Further research and larger sample sizes are warranted to validate and optimize the identified formulas for better patient outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03164-0IOL power calculation formulaSMILEFS-LASIKRefractive errorKeratometry
spellingShingle Liangpin Li
Liyun Yuan
Kun Yang
Yanan Wu
Xia Hua
Yan Wang
Xiaoyong Yuan
Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
BMC Ophthalmology
IOL power calculation formula
SMILE
FS-LASIK
Refractive error
Keratometry
title Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title_full Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title_short Comparative analysis of IOL power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients: a theoretical surgical model for FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures
title_sort comparative analysis of iol power calculations in postoperative refractive surgery patients a theoretical surgical model for fs lasik and smile procedures
topic IOL power calculation formula
SMILE
FS-LASIK
Refractive error
Keratometry
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03164-0
work_keys_str_mv AT liangpinli comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT liyunyuan comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT kunyang comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT yananwu comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT xiahua comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT yanwang comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures
AT xiaoyongyuan comparativeanalysisofiolpowercalculationsinpostoperativerefractivesurgerypatientsatheoreticalsurgicalmodelforfslasikandsmileprocedures