The consequences of including non-additive effects on the genetic evaluation of harvest body weight in Coho salmon (<it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>)
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In this study, we used different animal models to estimate genetic and environmental variance components on harvest weight in two populations of <it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>, forming two classes i.e. odd- and even-year s...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
BMC
2010-06-01
|
| Series: | Genetics Selection Evolution |
| Online Access: | http://www.gsejournal.org/content/42/1/19 |
| _version_ | 1818187572099153920 |
|---|---|
| author | Neira Roberto Lhorente Jean P Gallardo José A |
| author_facet | Neira Roberto Lhorente Jean P Gallardo José A |
| author_sort | Neira Roberto |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In this study, we used different animal models to estimate genetic and environmental variance components on harvest weight in two populations of <it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>, forming two classes i.e. odd- and even-year spawners.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The models used were: additive, with and without inbreeding as a covariable (A + F and A respectively); additive plus common environmental due to full-sib families and inbreeding (A + C + F); additive plus parental dominance and inbreeding (A + D + F); and a full model (A + C + D + F). Genetic parameters and breeding values obtained by different models were compared to evaluate the consequences of including non-additive effects on genetic evaluation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Including inbreeding as a covariable did not affect the estimation of genetic parameters, but heritability was reduced when dominance or common environmental effects were included. A high heritability for harvest weight was estimated in both populations (even = 0.46 and odd = 0.50) when simple additive models (A + F and A) were used. Heritabilities decreased to 0.21 (even) and 0.37 (odd) when the full model was used (A + C + D + F). In this full model, the magnitude of the dominance variance was 0.19 (even) and 0.06 (odd), while the magnitude of the common environmental effect was lower than 0.01 in both populations. The correlation between breeding values estimated with different models was very high in all cases (i.e. higher than 0.98). However, ranking of the 30 best males and the 100 best females per generation changed when a high dominance variance was estimated, as was the case in one of the two populations (even).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Dominance and common environmental variance may be important components of variance in harvest weight in <it>O. kisutch</it>, thus not including them may produce an overestimation of the predicted response; furthermore, genetic evaluation was seen to be partially affected, since the ranking of selected animals changed with the inclusion of non-additive effects in the animal model.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:13:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-890370f7c7a84bf8a96122a10dbff3ff |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0999-193X 1297-9686 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:13:09Z |
| publishDate | 2010-06-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Genetics Selection Evolution |
| spelling | doaj.art-890370f7c7a84bf8a96122a10dbff3ff2022-12-22T00:46:38ZdeuBMCGenetics Selection Evolution0999-193X1297-96862010-06-014211910.1186/1297-9686-42-19The consequences of including non-additive effects on the genetic evaluation of harvest body weight in Coho salmon (<it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>)Neira RobertoLhorente Jean PGallardo José A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In this study, we used different animal models to estimate genetic and environmental variance components on harvest weight in two populations of <it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>, forming two classes i.e. odd- and even-year spawners.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The models used were: additive, with and without inbreeding as a covariable (A + F and A respectively); additive plus common environmental due to full-sib families and inbreeding (A + C + F); additive plus parental dominance and inbreeding (A + D + F); and a full model (A + C + D + F). Genetic parameters and breeding values obtained by different models were compared to evaluate the consequences of including non-additive effects on genetic evaluation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Including inbreeding as a covariable did not affect the estimation of genetic parameters, but heritability was reduced when dominance or common environmental effects were included. A high heritability for harvest weight was estimated in both populations (even = 0.46 and odd = 0.50) when simple additive models (A + F and A) were used. Heritabilities decreased to 0.21 (even) and 0.37 (odd) when the full model was used (A + C + D + F). In this full model, the magnitude of the dominance variance was 0.19 (even) and 0.06 (odd), while the magnitude of the common environmental effect was lower than 0.01 in both populations. The correlation between breeding values estimated with different models was very high in all cases (i.e. higher than 0.98). However, ranking of the 30 best males and the 100 best females per generation changed when a high dominance variance was estimated, as was the case in one of the two populations (even).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Dominance and common environmental variance may be important components of variance in harvest weight in <it>O. kisutch</it>, thus not including them may produce an overestimation of the predicted response; furthermore, genetic evaluation was seen to be partially affected, since the ranking of selected animals changed with the inclusion of non-additive effects in the animal model.</p>http://www.gsejournal.org/content/42/1/19 |
| spellingShingle | Neira Roberto Lhorente Jean P Gallardo José A The consequences of including non-additive effects on the genetic evaluation of harvest body weight in Coho salmon (<it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>) Genetics Selection Evolution |
| title | The consequences of including non-additive effects on the genetic evaluation of harvest body weight in Coho salmon (<it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>) |
| title_full | The consequences of including non-additive effects on the genetic evaluation of harvest body weight in Coho salmon (<it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>) |
| title_fullStr | The consequences of including non-additive effects on the genetic evaluation of harvest body weight in Coho salmon (<it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>) |
| title_full_unstemmed | The consequences of including non-additive effects on the genetic evaluation of harvest body weight in Coho salmon (<it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>) |
| title_short | The consequences of including non-additive effects on the genetic evaluation of harvest body weight in Coho salmon (<it>Oncorhynchus kisutch</it>) |
| title_sort | consequences of including non additive effects on the genetic evaluation of harvest body weight in coho salmon it oncorhynchus kisutch it |
| url | http://www.gsejournal.org/content/42/1/19 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT neiraroberto theconsequencesofincludingnonadditiveeffectsonthegeneticevaluationofharvestbodyweightincohosalmonitoncorhynchuskisutchit AT lhorentejeanp theconsequencesofincludingnonadditiveeffectsonthegeneticevaluationofharvestbodyweightincohosalmonitoncorhynchuskisutchit AT gallardojosea theconsequencesofincludingnonadditiveeffectsonthegeneticevaluationofharvestbodyweightincohosalmonitoncorhynchuskisutchit AT neiraroberto consequencesofincludingnonadditiveeffectsonthegeneticevaluationofharvestbodyweightincohosalmonitoncorhynchuskisutchit AT lhorentejeanp consequencesofincludingnonadditiveeffectsonthegeneticevaluationofharvestbodyweightincohosalmonitoncorhynchuskisutchit AT gallardojosea consequencesofincludingnonadditiveeffectsonthegeneticevaluationofharvestbodyweightincohosalmonitoncorhynchuskisutchit |