Does participation in livelihood education programs impact household food security? A comparative study in rural Uganda

Food and nutrition security projections from global to household levels show that the future requires multifaceted approaches to achieve desired goals. In Uganda, the government has tried several strate­gies to promote food production, including a public-private partnership with Iowa State Univer­s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel Ikendi, Francis Owusu, Dorothy Masinde, Ann Oberhauser, Carmen Bain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems 2023-11-01
Series:Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1202
_version_ 1797513003275386880
author Samuel Ikendi
Francis Owusu
Dorothy Masinde
Ann Oberhauser
Carmen Bain
author_facet Samuel Ikendi
Francis Owusu
Dorothy Masinde
Ann Oberhauser
Carmen Bain
author_sort Samuel Ikendi
collection DOAJ
description Food and nutrition security projections from global to household levels show that the future requires multifaceted approaches to achieve desired goals. In Uganda, the government has tried several strate­gies to promote food production, including a public-private partnership with Iowa State Univer­sity through its Center for Sustainable Rural Liveli­hoods. In this comparative study, we surveyed 454 households to explore whether participation in livelihood education programs (LEPs) impact household food security. We also determine which LEPs and household characteristics influence food security. Overall, 46.3% of the surveyed house­holds were food secure, while the remaining were insecure or extremely insecure. Significantly, 51.0% of LEP participants were more food secure, com­pared to 35.5% of nonparticipants. Specific LEPs including agronomy and postharvest technologies, and livestock integration significantly influence food security, but less so for programs on nutrition and infant feeding, water supply and public health, complementary services like therapeutic porridge and assistance with immunization, and income innovations. Multinomial logistic regression analy­sis revealed that the household characteristics of keeping livestock and the number of meals eaten during periods of scarcity, influenced households having more food security than insecurity or extreme insecurity. Households participating in LEPs, having larger acreage of land, and having clean water and sanitation facilities were more food secure. The time taken to fetch water, days of ill­ness of male adults, and belonging to community social groups, also influence the level of household food security. Based on these findings, we recom­mend that households should participate in LEPs to build their capacity to manage crop and live­stock production, and also to acquire knowledge of nutrition and feeding, public health, and income innovations.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:08:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8912547c14ec4d2685628c19cabbb79c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2152-0801
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:08:36Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
record_format Article
series Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
spelling doaj.art-8912547c14ec4d2685628c19cabbb79c2023-11-22T20:18:04ZengLyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food SystemsJournal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development2152-08012023-11-0113110.5304/jafscd.2023.131.009Does participation in livelihood education programs impact household food security? A comparative study in rural UgandaSamuel Ikendi0Francis Owusu1Dorothy Masinde2Ann Oberhauser3Carmen Bain4Iowa State UniversityIowa State UniversityIowa State UniversityIowa State UniversityIowa State University Food and nutrition security projections from global to household levels show that the future requires multifaceted approaches to achieve desired goals. In Uganda, the government has tried several strate­gies to promote food production, including a public-private partnership with Iowa State Univer­sity through its Center for Sustainable Rural Liveli­hoods. In this comparative study, we surveyed 454 households to explore whether participation in livelihood education programs (LEPs) impact household food security. We also determine which LEPs and household characteristics influence food security. Overall, 46.3% of the surveyed house­holds were food secure, while the remaining were insecure or extremely insecure. Significantly, 51.0% of LEP participants were more food secure, com­pared to 35.5% of nonparticipants. Specific LEPs including agronomy and postharvest technologies, and livestock integration significantly influence food security, but less so for programs on nutrition and infant feeding, water supply and public health, complementary services like therapeutic porridge and assistance with immunization, and income innovations. Multinomial logistic regression analy­sis revealed that the household characteristics of keeping livestock and the number of meals eaten during periods of scarcity, influenced households having more food security than insecurity or extreme insecurity. Households participating in LEPs, having larger acreage of land, and having clean water and sanitation facilities were more food secure. The time taken to fetch water, days of ill­ness of male adults, and belonging to community social groups, also influence the level of household food security. Based on these findings, we recom­mend that households should participate in LEPs to build their capacity to manage crop and live­stock production, and also to acquire knowledge of nutrition and feeding, public health, and income innovations. https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1202agronomy and land usefood and nutrition securitygrain storage and postharvestincome innovationslivelihood education programslivestock integration
spellingShingle Samuel Ikendi
Francis Owusu
Dorothy Masinde
Ann Oberhauser
Carmen Bain
Does participation in livelihood education programs impact household food security? A comparative study in rural Uganda
Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
agronomy and land use
food and nutrition security
grain storage and postharvest
income innovations
livelihood education programs
livestock integration
title Does participation in livelihood education programs impact household food security? A comparative study in rural Uganda
title_full Does participation in livelihood education programs impact household food security? A comparative study in rural Uganda
title_fullStr Does participation in livelihood education programs impact household food security? A comparative study in rural Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Does participation in livelihood education programs impact household food security? A comparative study in rural Uganda
title_short Does participation in livelihood education programs impact household food security? A comparative study in rural Uganda
title_sort does participation in livelihood education programs impact household food security a comparative study in rural uganda
topic agronomy and land use
food and nutrition security
grain storage and postharvest
income innovations
livelihood education programs
livestock integration
url https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1202
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelikendi doesparticipationinlivelihoodeducationprogramsimpacthouseholdfoodsecurityacomparativestudyinruraluganda
AT francisowusu doesparticipationinlivelihoodeducationprogramsimpacthouseholdfoodsecurityacomparativestudyinruraluganda
AT dorothymasinde doesparticipationinlivelihoodeducationprogramsimpacthouseholdfoodsecurityacomparativestudyinruraluganda
AT annoberhauser doesparticipationinlivelihoodeducationprogramsimpacthouseholdfoodsecurityacomparativestudyinruraluganda
AT carmenbain doesparticipationinlivelihoodeducationprogramsimpacthouseholdfoodsecurityacomparativestudyinruraluganda