Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals

Should the many sensibilities and behaviors exhibited by non-human animals similar to humans qualify as morality? While some see non-human social behaviors as a development of human moral behavior, others point out a conspicuous lack of essential components of human morality are altogether set apart...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean Porter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Journal of Moral Theology, Inc. 2014-06-01
Series:Journal of Moral Theology
Online Access:https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11268-moral-passions-a-thomistic-interpretation-of-moral-emotions-in-nonhuman-and-human-animals
_version_ 1797654099120881664
author Jean Porter
author_facet Jean Porter
author_sort Jean Porter
collection DOAJ
description Should the many sensibilities and behaviors exhibited by non-human animals similar to humans qualify as morality? While some see non-human social behaviors as a development of human moral behavior, others point out a conspicuous lack of essential components of human morality are altogether set apart from non-human acts. A Thomistic analysis that takes into consideration reason, will, and the passions show that emotions – while indeed indispensable and representing the immediate reaction to our social world – are incomplete for an understanding of man, who utilizes his reason and will to order his initial emotions into morally meaningful acts.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T16:54:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-891df3395d7e490a8f07f140ce72308f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2166-2851
2166-2118
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T16:54:26Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher The Journal of Moral Theology, Inc.
record_format Article
series Journal of Moral Theology
spelling doaj.art-891df3395d7e490a8f07f140ce72308f2023-10-20T17:34:30ZengThe Journal of Moral Theology, Inc.Journal of Moral Theology2166-28512166-21182014-06-0132Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human AnimalsJean PorterShould the many sensibilities and behaviors exhibited by non-human animals similar to humans qualify as morality? While some see non-human social behaviors as a development of human moral behavior, others point out a conspicuous lack of essential components of human morality are altogether set apart from non-human acts. A Thomistic analysis that takes into consideration reason, will, and the passions show that emotions – while indeed indispensable and representing the immediate reaction to our social world – are incomplete for an understanding of man, who utilizes his reason and will to order his initial emotions into morally meaningful acts.https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11268-moral-passions-a-thomistic-interpretation-of-moral-emotions-in-nonhuman-and-human-animals
spellingShingle Jean Porter
Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals
Journal of Moral Theology
title Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals
title_full Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals
title_fullStr Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals
title_full_unstemmed Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals
title_short Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals
title_sort moral passions a thomistic interpretation of moral emotions in nonhuman and human animals
url https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11268-moral-passions-a-thomistic-interpretation-of-moral-emotions-in-nonhuman-and-human-animals
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanporter moralpassionsathomisticinterpretationofmoralemotionsinnonhumanandhumananimals