Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals
Should the many sensibilities and behaviors exhibited by non-human animals similar to humans qualify as morality? While some see non-human social behaviors as a development of human moral behavior, others point out a conspicuous lack of essential components of human morality are altogether set apart...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Journal of Moral Theology, Inc.
2014-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Moral Theology |
Online Access: | https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11268-moral-passions-a-thomistic-interpretation-of-moral-emotions-in-nonhuman-and-human-animals |
_version_ | 1797654099120881664 |
---|---|
author | Jean Porter |
author_facet | Jean Porter |
author_sort | Jean Porter |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Should the many sensibilities and behaviors exhibited by non-human animals similar to humans qualify as morality? While some see non-human social behaviors as a development of human moral behavior, others point out a conspicuous lack of essential components of human morality are altogether set apart from non-human acts. A Thomistic analysis that takes into consideration reason, will, and the passions show that emotions – while indeed indispensable and representing the immediate reaction to our social world – are incomplete for an understanding of man, who utilizes his reason and will to order his initial emotions into morally meaningful acts. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T16:54:26Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-891df3395d7e490a8f07f140ce72308f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2166-2851 2166-2118 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T16:54:26Z |
publishDate | 2014-06-01 |
publisher | The Journal of Moral Theology, Inc. |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Moral Theology |
spelling | doaj.art-891df3395d7e490a8f07f140ce72308f2023-10-20T17:34:30ZengThe Journal of Moral Theology, Inc.Journal of Moral Theology2166-28512166-21182014-06-0132Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human AnimalsJean PorterShould the many sensibilities and behaviors exhibited by non-human animals similar to humans qualify as morality? While some see non-human social behaviors as a development of human moral behavior, others point out a conspicuous lack of essential components of human morality are altogether set apart from non-human acts. A Thomistic analysis that takes into consideration reason, will, and the passions show that emotions – while indeed indispensable and representing the immediate reaction to our social world – are incomplete for an understanding of man, who utilizes his reason and will to order his initial emotions into morally meaningful acts.https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11268-moral-passions-a-thomistic-interpretation-of-moral-emotions-in-nonhuman-and-human-animals |
spellingShingle | Jean Porter Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals Journal of Moral Theology |
title | Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals |
title_full | Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals |
title_fullStr | Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals |
title_full_unstemmed | Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals |
title_short | Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human Animals |
title_sort | moral passions a thomistic interpretation of moral emotions in nonhuman and human animals |
url | https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11268-moral-passions-a-thomistic-interpretation-of-moral-emotions-in-nonhuman-and-human-animals |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeanporter moralpassionsathomisticinterpretationofmoralemotionsinnonhumanandhumananimals |