Why isn’t sex optional? Stem-cell competition, loss of regenerative capacity, and cancer in metazoan evolution

Animals that can reproduce vegetatively by fission or budding and also sexually via specialized gametes are found in all five primary animal lineages (Bilateria, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Placozoa, Porifera). Many bilaterian lineages, including roundworms, insects, and most chordates, have lost the capa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris Fields, Michael Levin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Communicative & Integrative Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2020.1838809
_version_ 1818455329494532096
author Chris Fields
Michael Levin
author_facet Chris Fields
Michael Levin
author_sort Chris Fields
collection DOAJ
description Animals that can reproduce vegetatively by fission or budding and also sexually via specialized gametes are found in all five primary animal lineages (Bilateria, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Placozoa, Porifera). Many bilaterian lineages, including roundworms, insects, and most chordates, have lost the capability of vegetative reproduction and are obligately gametic. We suggest a developmental explanation for this evolutionary phenomenon: obligate gametic reproduction is the result of germline stem cells winning a winner-take-all competition with non-germline stem cells for control of reproduction and hence lineage survival. We develop this suggestion by extending Hamilton’s rule, which factors the relatedness between parties into the cost/benefit analysis that underpins cooperative behaviors, to include similarity of cellular state. We show how coercive or deceptive cell-cell signaling can be used to make costly cooperative behaviors appear less costly to the cooperating party. We then show how competition between stem-cell lineages can render an ancestral combination of vegetative reproduction with facultative sex unstable, with one or the other process driven to extinction. The increased susceptibility to cancer observed in obligately-sexual lineages is, we suggest, a side-effect of deceptive signaling that is exacerbated by the loss of whole-body regenerative abilities. We suggest a variety of experimental approaches for testing our predictions.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T22:09:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8922223074a24a4fb284ac6c43febb87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1942-0889
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T22:09:03Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Communicative & Integrative Biology
spelling doaj.art-8922223074a24a4fb284ac6c43febb872022-12-21T22:45:48ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCommunicative & Integrative Biology1942-08892020-01-0113117018310.1080/19420889.2020.18388091838809Why isn’t sex optional? Stem-cell competition, loss of regenerative capacity, and cancer in metazoan evolutionChris Fields0Michael Levin1Caunes Minervois, FranceAllen Discovery Center at Tufts UniversityAnimals that can reproduce vegetatively by fission or budding and also sexually via specialized gametes are found in all five primary animal lineages (Bilateria, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Placozoa, Porifera). Many bilaterian lineages, including roundworms, insects, and most chordates, have lost the capability of vegetative reproduction and are obligately gametic. We suggest a developmental explanation for this evolutionary phenomenon: obligate gametic reproduction is the result of germline stem cells winning a winner-take-all competition with non-germline stem cells for control of reproduction and hence lineage survival. We develop this suggestion by extending Hamilton’s rule, which factors the relatedness between parties into the cost/benefit analysis that underpins cooperative behaviors, to include similarity of cellular state. We show how coercive or deceptive cell-cell signaling can be used to make costly cooperative behaviors appear less costly to the cooperating party. We then show how competition between stem-cell lineages can render an ancestral combination of vegetative reproduction with facultative sex unstable, with one or the other process driven to extinction. The increased susceptibility to cancer observed in obligately-sexual lineages is, we suggest, a side-effect of deceptive signaling that is exacerbated by the loss of whole-body regenerative abilities. We suggest a variety of experimental approaches for testing our predictions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2020.1838809evo-devofacultative sexualitygermline progenitorshamilton’s rulepiwi/pirna systemwhole-body regeneration
spellingShingle Chris Fields
Michael Levin
Why isn’t sex optional? Stem-cell competition, loss of regenerative capacity, and cancer in metazoan evolution
Communicative & Integrative Biology
evo-devo
facultative sexuality
germline progenitors
hamilton’s rule
piwi/pirna system
whole-body regeneration
title Why isn’t sex optional? Stem-cell competition, loss of regenerative capacity, and cancer in metazoan evolution
title_full Why isn’t sex optional? Stem-cell competition, loss of regenerative capacity, and cancer in metazoan evolution
title_fullStr Why isn’t sex optional? Stem-cell competition, loss of regenerative capacity, and cancer in metazoan evolution
title_full_unstemmed Why isn’t sex optional? Stem-cell competition, loss of regenerative capacity, and cancer in metazoan evolution
title_short Why isn’t sex optional? Stem-cell competition, loss of regenerative capacity, and cancer in metazoan evolution
title_sort why isn t sex optional stem cell competition loss of regenerative capacity and cancer in metazoan evolution
topic evo-devo
facultative sexuality
germline progenitors
hamilton’s rule
piwi/pirna system
whole-body regeneration
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2020.1838809
work_keys_str_mv AT chrisfields whyisntsexoptionalstemcellcompetitionlossofregenerativecapacityandcancerinmetazoanevolution
AT michaellevin whyisntsexoptionalstemcellcompetitionlossofregenerativecapacityandcancerinmetazoanevolution