A Promising Catalyst for the Dehydrogenation of Perhydro-Dibenzyltoluene: Pt/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Prepared by Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> Deposition

Pt/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalysts prepared via supercritical deposition (SCD), with supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>, wet impregnation (WI) methods and a selected benchmark catalyst, were evaluated for the dehydrogenation of perhydro-dibenzyltoluene (H18-DBT) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Phillimon Modisha, Rudaviro Garidzirai, Hande Güneş, Selmi Erim Bozbag, Sarshad Rommel, Erdal Uzunlar, Mark Aindow, Can Erkey, Dmitri Bessarabov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Catalysts
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/12/5/489
Description
Summary:Pt/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalysts prepared via supercritical deposition (SCD), with supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>, wet impregnation (WI) methods and a selected benchmark catalyst, were evaluated for the dehydrogenation of perhydro-dibenzyltoluene (H18-DBT) at 300 °C in a batch reactor. After ten dehydrogenation runs, the average performance of the catalyst prepared using SCD was the highest compared to the benchmark and WI-prepared catalysts. The pre-treatment of the catalysts with the product (dibenzyltoluene) indicated that the deactivation observed is mainly due to the adsorbed H0-DBT blocking the active sites for the reactant (H18-DBT). Furthermore, the SCD method afforded a catalyst with a higher dispersion of smaller sized Pt particles, thus improving catalytic performance towards the dehydrogenation of H18-DBT. The particle diameters of the SCD- and WI-prepared catalysts varied in the ranges of 0.6–2.2 nm and 0.8–3.4 nm and had average particle sizes of 1.1 nm and 1.7 nm, respectively. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis of the catalysts after ten dehydrogenation runs revealed the presence of carbon. In this study, improved catalyst performance led to the production of more liquid-based by-products and carbon material compared to catalysts with low catalytic performance.
ISSN:2073-4344