Rotator Cuff Injuries: Is Ultrasound Enough? A Correlation with MRI

Introduction: Shoulder pain is one of the most common presentations in Orthopaedic patients. Rotator cuff pathologies consist of a significant proportion of shoulder pathologies. With progress in imaging techniques, the preoperative detection and characterisation of rotator cuff injuries has bec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vishal Dhirenbhai Thakker, Dipu Bhuyan, Manali Arora, Mohsina Islam Bora
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd. 2017-07-01
Series:International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijars.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2017&month=July&volume=6&issue=3&page=RO01-RO07&id=2279
_version_ 1818059667867172864
author Vishal Dhirenbhai Thakker
Dipu Bhuyan
Manali Arora
Mohsina Islam Bora
author_facet Vishal Dhirenbhai Thakker
Dipu Bhuyan
Manali Arora
Mohsina Islam Bora
author_sort Vishal Dhirenbhai Thakker
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Shoulder pain is one of the most common presentations in Orthopaedic patients. Rotator cuff pathologies consist of a significant proportion of shoulder pathologies. With progress in imaging techniques, the preoperative detection and characterisation of rotator cuff injuries has become much easier. Ultrasound (USG) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are the most commonly used imaging modalities for rotator cuff tears. Excellent soft tissue resolution, multiplanar imaging and non-invasive technique have made MRI the imaging modality of choice in evaluation of rotator cuff. However, high cost and limited availability prevent it from becoming the screening modality of choice. USG on the other hand is cheap and easily available and hence can be made the first modality for rotator cuff tears. Aim: To determine the efficacy of USG in detecting rotator cuff tears in comparison to MRI. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 50 patients of all age groups in Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Assam, India, with suspicious rotator cuff tears first by high resolution USG and then by 1.5 T MRI. Both USG and MRI were performed by the same radiologist. Since MRI was always followed by USG, the radiologist was blind to the MRI results. Results: Supraspinatus was the most commonly affected tendon (79%). Partial thickness tears were the most common rotator cuff pathology. USG showed a sensitivity of 66.67%, specificity of 92.5%, PPV of 68.96% and NPV of 91.74% in detecting partial thickness tears. Whereas, USG showed excellent results in detecting full thickness tears with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 99.31%, PPV of 91.74% and NPV of 100%. Conclusion: USG done has a near similar accuracy for detecting full thickness rotator cuff tears as MRI and has an acceptable accuracy for detecting partial thickness tears too. Hence, due to its availability, accuracy and cost effectiveness, USG should be made the first line modality for detecting rotator cuff tears and MRI should be reserved for indeterminate or complex cases where USG does not suffice in serving the clinical purpose.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:20:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8938cfa4574e47b6b3e42cf201adf4f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2277-8543
2455-6874
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:20:10Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.
record_format Article
series International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery
spelling doaj.art-8938cfa4574e47b6b3e42cf201adf4f12022-12-22T01:47:22ZengJCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery2277-85432455-68742017-07-0163RO01RO0710.7860/IJARS/2017/28116:2279Rotator Cuff Injuries: Is Ultrasound Enough? A Correlation with MRIVishal Dhirenbhai Thakker0Dipu Bhuyan1Manali Arora2Mohsina Islam Bora3Senior Resident, Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Pramukhswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India.Associate Professor, Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, IndiaSenior Resident, Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Pramukhswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India.Registrar, Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.Introduction: Shoulder pain is one of the most common presentations in Orthopaedic patients. Rotator cuff pathologies consist of a significant proportion of shoulder pathologies. With progress in imaging techniques, the preoperative detection and characterisation of rotator cuff injuries has become much easier. Ultrasound (USG) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are the most commonly used imaging modalities for rotator cuff tears. Excellent soft tissue resolution, multiplanar imaging and non-invasive technique have made MRI the imaging modality of choice in evaluation of rotator cuff. However, high cost and limited availability prevent it from becoming the screening modality of choice. USG on the other hand is cheap and easily available and hence can be made the first modality for rotator cuff tears. Aim: To determine the efficacy of USG in detecting rotator cuff tears in comparison to MRI. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 50 patients of all age groups in Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Assam, India, with suspicious rotator cuff tears first by high resolution USG and then by 1.5 T MRI. Both USG and MRI were performed by the same radiologist. Since MRI was always followed by USG, the radiologist was blind to the MRI results. Results: Supraspinatus was the most commonly affected tendon (79%). Partial thickness tears were the most common rotator cuff pathology. USG showed a sensitivity of 66.67%, specificity of 92.5%, PPV of 68.96% and NPV of 91.74% in detecting partial thickness tears. Whereas, USG showed excellent results in detecting full thickness tears with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 99.31%, PPV of 91.74% and NPV of 100%. Conclusion: USG done has a near similar accuracy for detecting full thickness rotator cuff tears as MRI and has an acceptable accuracy for detecting partial thickness tears too. Hence, due to its availability, accuracy and cost effectiveness, USG should be made the first line modality for detecting rotator cuff tears and MRI should be reserved for indeterminate or complex cases where USG does not suffice in serving the clinical purpose.http://www.ijars.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2017&month=July&volume=6&issue=3&page=RO01-RO07&id=2279high resolution usgmri shouldermusculoskeletal imaging
spellingShingle Vishal Dhirenbhai Thakker
Dipu Bhuyan
Manali Arora
Mohsina Islam Bora
Rotator Cuff Injuries: Is Ultrasound Enough? A Correlation with MRI
International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery
high resolution usg
mri shoulder
musculoskeletal imaging
title Rotator Cuff Injuries: Is Ultrasound Enough? A Correlation with MRI
title_full Rotator Cuff Injuries: Is Ultrasound Enough? A Correlation with MRI
title_fullStr Rotator Cuff Injuries: Is Ultrasound Enough? A Correlation with MRI
title_full_unstemmed Rotator Cuff Injuries: Is Ultrasound Enough? A Correlation with MRI
title_short Rotator Cuff Injuries: Is Ultrasound Enough? A Correlation with MRI
title_sort rotator cuff injuries is ultrasound enough a correlation with mri
topic high resolution usg
mri shoulder
musculoskeletal imaging
url http://www.ijars.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2017&month=July&volume=6&issue=3&page=RO01-RO07&id=2279
work_keys_str_mv AT vishaldhirenbhaithakker rotatorcuffinjuriesisultrasoundenoughacorrelationwithmri
AT dipubhuyan rotatorcuffinjuriesisultrasoundenoughacorrelationwithmri
AT manaliarora rotatorcuffinjuriesisultrasoundenoughacorrelationwithmri
AT mohsinaislambora rotatorcuffinjuriesisultrasoundenoughacorrelationwithmri