Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There have been dramatic changes in the approach to screening for aneuploidy over the last 20 years. However, the approach to screening for other complications of pregnancy such as intra-uterine growth restriction, pre-eclampsia and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: White Ian R, Charnock-Jones D Stephen, Cook Emma, Dacey Alison, Pasupathy Dharmintra, Smith Gordon CS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-11-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/51
_version_ 1811249384254341120
author White Ian R
Charnock-Jones D Stephen
Cook Emma
Dacey Alison
Pasupathy Dharmintra
Smith Gordon CS
author_facet White Ian R
Charnock-Jones D Stephen
Cook Emma
Dacey Alison
Pasupathy Dharmintra
Smith Gordon CS
author_sort White Ian R
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There have been dramatic changes in the approach to screening for aneuploidy over the last 20 years. However, the approach to screening for other complications of pregnancy such as intra-uterine growth restriction, pre-eclampsia and stillbirth remains largely unchanged. Randomised controlled trials of routine application of high tech screening methods to the general population have generally failed to show improvement in outcome. We have previously reviewed this and concluded it was due, in large part, to poor performance of screening tests. Here, we report a study design where the primary aim is to generate clinically useful methods to screen women to assess their risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>We report the design of a prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women recruited at the time of their first ultrasound scan. Participation involves serial phlebotomy and obstetric ultrasound at the dating ultrasound scan (typically 10–14 weeks), 20 weeks, 28 weeks and 36 weeks gestation. In addition, maternal demographic details are obtained; maternal and paternal height are measured and maternal weight is serially measured during the pregnancy; maternal, paternal and offspring DNA are collected; and, samples of placenta and membranes are collected at birth. Data will be analysed as a prospective cohort study, a case-cohort study, and a nested case-control study.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The study is expected to provide a resource for the identification of novel biomarkers for adverse pregnancy outcome and to evaluate the performance of biomarkers and serial ultrasonography in providing clinically useful prediction of risk.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T15:45:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8949b64dc7f64c84a827e43a698aebcc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T15:45:35Z
publishDate 2008-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-8949b64dc7f64c84a827e43a698aebcc2022-12-22T03:26:40ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932008-11-01815110.1186/1471-2393-8-51Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction studyWhite Ian RCharnock-Jones D StephenCook EmmaDacey AlisonPasupathy DharmintraSmith Gordon CS<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There have been dramatic changes in the approach to screening for aneuploidy over the last 20 years. However, the approach to screening for other complications of pregnancy such as intra-uterine growth restriction, pre-eclampsia and stillbirth remains largely unchanged. Randomised controlled trials of routine application of high tech screening methods to the general population have generally failed to show improvement in outcome. We have previously reviewed this and concluded it was due, in large part, to poor performance of screening tests. Here, we report a study design where the primary aim is to generate clinically useful methods to screen women to assess their risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>We report the design of a prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women recruited at the time of their first ultrasound scan. Participation involves serial phlebotomy and obstetric ultrasound at the dating ultrasound scan (typically 10–14 weeks), 20 weeks, 28 weeks and 36 weeks gestation. In addition, maternal demographic details are obtained; maternal and paternal height are measured and maternal weight is serially measured during the pregnancy; maternal, paternal and offspring DNA are collected; and, samples of placenta and membranes are collected at birth. Data will be analysed as a prospective cohort study, a case-cohort study, and a nested case-control study.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The study is expected to provide a resource for the identification of novel biomarkers for adverse pregnancy outcome and to evaluate the performance of biomarkers and serial ultrasonography in providing clinically useful prediction of risk.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/51
spellingShingle White Ian R
Charnock-Jones D Stephen
Cook Emma
Dacey Alison
Pasupathy Dharmintra
Smith Gordon CS
Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
title Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study
title_full Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study
title_fullStr Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study
title_short Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study
title_sort study protocol a prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women the pregnancy outcome prediction study
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/51
work_keys_str_mv AT whiteianr studyprotocolaprospectivecohortstudyofunselectedprimiparouswomenthepregnancyoutcomepredictionstudy
AT charnockjonesdstephen studyprotocolaprospectivecohortstudyofunselectedprimiparouswomenthepregnancyoutcomepredictionstudy
AT cookemma studyprotocolaprospectivecohortstudyofunselectedprimiparouswomenthepregnancyoutcomepredictionstudy
AT daceyalison studyprotocolaprospectivecohortstudyofunselectedprimiparouswomenthepregnancyoutcomepredictionstudy
AT pasupathydharmintra studyprotocolaprospectivecohortstudyofunselectedprimiparouswomenthepregnancyoutcomepredictionstudy
AT smithgordoncs studyprotocolaprospectivecohortstudyofunselectedprimiparouswomenthepregnancyoutcomepredictionstudy