High-speed imaging and statistics of puffing and micro-exploding droplets in spray-flame synthesis

Thermally-induced breakup of metal-precursor-laden droplets in spray-flame synthesis occurs via a rapid and disruptive disintegration, i.e., “puffing” and “micro-explosion”. To assess the temporal evolution and statistics of droplet disruption, LED-illuminated droplet shadowgraphs were imaged with a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Jüngst, I. Skenderović, B.A. Südholt, G.J. Smallwood, F.E. Kruis, S.A. Kaiser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-09-01
Series:Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666352X23000560
Description
Summary:Thermally-induced breakup of metal-precursor-laden droplets in spray-flame synthesis occurs via a rapid and disruptive disintegration, i.e., “puffing” and “micro-explosion”. To assess the temporal evolution and statistics of droplet disruption, LED-illuminated droplet shadowgraphs were imaged with a microscope onto a high-speed camera and morphological image analysis was applied. The atomized liquid was a mixture of 35 vol.-% ethanol and 65 vol.-% 2-ethylhexanoic acid mixed with iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate (INN) as a precursor. Droplet evaporation and disruption were also simulated with a population balance model. The model finds solid precipitates forming in the droplets because of the decomposition of the precursor intermediate iron(III) 2-ethylhexanoate. The precipitates form a particle shell, which favors the superheating of the droplets’ interior, and they facilitate heterogeneous bubble nucleation. Imaging experiments and modelling find that per 10 µs lifetime of a droplet, the probability for disruption increases from 5 to 13% and 5 to 19%, respectively, when increasing the INN concentration from 0.05 to 0.5 mole/l. The probability of disruption suggests that throughout their lifetime in the spray flame, nearly all droplets will undergo disruption and many of them multiple times. In the experiment, droplets before disruption are 15% smaller than regular, non-disrupting droplets. Once disrupted, the droplets have a 45% smaller mean diameter than regular droplets. Under all conditions, disrupting and disrupted droplets are slower than regular droplets while the disruption does not significantly accelerate disrupted droplets.
ISSN:2666-352X