How much does the typical ecological meta‐analysis overestimate the true mean effect size?
Abstract Many primary research studies in ecology are underpowered, providing very imprecise estimates of effect size. Meta‐analyses partially mitigate this imprecision by combining data from different studies. But meta‐analytic estimates of mean effect size may still remain imprecise, particularly...
Main Author: | Jeremy W. Fox |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022-11-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9521 |
Similar Items
-
Consistency of the Estimator for the Common Mean in Fixed-Effect Meta-Analyses
by: Nanami Taketomi, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01) -
Effect Sizes, Power, and Biases in Intelligence Research: A Meta-Meta-Analysis
by: Michèle B. Nuijten, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
MetaWin 3: open-source software for meta-analysis
by: Michael S. Rosenberg
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Addressing Dependency in Meta-Analysis: A Companion to Assink and Wibbelink (2016)
by: Assink, Mark, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Has the Time Come to Stop Using the “Standardised Mean Difference”?
by: Pim Cuijpers
Published: (2021-09-01)