Specialist valve clinic in a cardiac centre: 10-year experience

Aims Guidelines recommend specialist valve clinics as best practice for the assessment and conservative management of patients with heart valve disease. However, there is little guidance on how to set up and organise a clinic. The aim of this study is to describe a clinic run by a multidisciplinary...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sheila Subbiah, Ronak Rajani, Denise Parkin, Helen Rimington, Camelia Demetrescu, Anna Hayes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-01
Series:Open Heart
Online Access:https://openheart.bmj.com/content/7/1/e001262.full
_version_ 1819175532948881408
author Sheila Subbiah
Ronak Rajani
Denise Parkin
Helen Rimington
Camelia Demetrescu
Anna Hayes
author_facet Sheila Subbiah
Ronak Rajani
Denise Parkin
Helen Rimington
Camelia Demetrescu
Anna Hayes
author_sort Sheila Subbiah
collection DOAJ
description Aims Guidelines recommend specialist valve clinics as best practice for the assessment and conservative management of patients with heart valve disease. However, there is little guidance on how to set up and organise a clinic. The aim of this study is to describe a clinic run by a multidisciplinary team consisting of cardiologists, physiologist/scientists and a nurse.Methods The clinical and organisational aims of the clinic, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and links with other services are described. The methods of training non-clinical staff are detailed. Data were prospectively entered onto a database and the study consisted of an analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of all patients seen between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018.Results There were 2126 new patients and 9522 visits in the 10-year period. The mean age was 64.8 and 55% were male. Of the visits, 3587 (38%) were to the cardiologists, 4092 (43%) to the physiologist/scientists and 1843 (19%) to the nurse. The outcomes from the cardiologist clinics were cardiology follow-up in 460 (30%), referral for surgery in 354 (23%), referral to the physiologist/scientist clinic in 412 (27%) or to the nurse clinic in 65 (4.3%) and discharge in 230 (15%). The cardiologist needed to see 6% from the nurse clinic and 10% from the physiologist/scientist clinic, while advice alone was sufficient in 10% and 9%.Conclusion A multidisciplinary specialist valve clinic is feasible and sustainable in the long term.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T20:56:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-896d91b0a2c5409bba51f73cfa923b02
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2053-3624
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T20:56:22Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Open Heart
spelling doaj.art-896d91b0a2c5409bba51f73cfa923b022022-12-21T18:12:57ZengBMJ Publishing GroupOpen Heart2053-36242020-06-017110.1136/openhrt-2020-001262Specialist valve clinic in a cardiac centre: 10-year experienceSheila Subbiah0Ronak Rajani1Denise Parkin2Helen Rimington3Camelia Demetrescu4Anna Hayes5Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UKGuy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UKGuy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UKGuy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UKGuy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UKGuy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UKAims Guidelines recommend specialist valve clinics as best practice for the assessment and conservative management of patients with heart valve disease. However, there is little guidance on how to set up and organise a clinic. The aim of this study is to describe a clinic run by a multidisciplinary team consisting of cardiologists, physiologist/scientists and a nurse.Methods The clinical and organisational aims of the clinic, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and links with other services are described. The methods of training non-clinical staff are detailed. Data were prospectively entered onto a database and the study consisted of an analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of all patients seen between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018.Results There were 2126 new patients and 9522 visits in the 10-year period. The mean age was 64.8 and 55% were male. Of the visits, 3587 (38%) were to the cardiologists, 4092 (43%) to the physiologist/scientists and 1843 (19%) to the nurse. The outcomes from the cardiologist clinics were cardiology follow-up in 460 (30%), referral for surgery in 354 (23%), referral to the physiologist/scientist clinic in 412 (27%) or to the nurse clinic in 65 (4.3%) and discharge in 230 (15%). The cardiologist needed to see 6% from the nurse clinic and 10% from the physiologist/scientist clinic, while advice alone was sufficient in 10% and 9%.Conclusion A multidisciplinary specialist valve clinic is feasible and sustainable in the long term.https://openheart.bmj.com/content/7/1/e001262.full
spellingShingle Sheila Subbiah
Ronak Rajani
Denise Parkin
Helen Rimington
Camelia Demetrescu
Anna Hayes
Specialist valve clinic in a cardiac centre: 10-year experience
Open Heart
title Specialist valve clinic in a cardiac centre: 10-year experience
title_full Specialist valve clinic in a cardiac centre: 10-year experience
title_fullStr Specialist valve clinic in a cardiac centre: 10-year experience
title_full_unstemmed Specialist valve clinic in a cardiac centre: 10-year experience
title_short Specialist valve clinic in a cardiac centre: 10-year experience
title_sort specialist valve clinic in a cardiac centre 10 year experience
url https://openheart.bmj.com/content/7/1/e001262.full
work_keys_str_mv AT sheilasubbiah specialistvalveclinicinacardiaccentre10yearexperience
AT ronakrajani specialistvalveclinicinacardiaccentre10yearexperience
AT deniseparkin specialistvalveclinicinacardiaccentre10yearexperience
AT helenrimington specialistvalveclinicinacardiaccentre10yearexperience
AT cameliademetrescu specialistvalveclinicinacardiaccentre10yearexperience
AT annahayes specialistvalveclinicinacardiaccentre10yearexperience