Self-Deception, Delusion and the Boundaries of Folk Psychology

To what extent do self-deception and delusion overlap? In this paper we argue that both self-deception and delusions can be understood in folk-psychological terms. “Motivated” delusions, just like self-deception, can be described as beliefs driven by personal interests. If self-deception can be unde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa Bortolotti, Matteo Mameli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente 2018-06-01
Series:Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/201
_version_ 1828523802934378496
author Lisa Bortolotti
Matteo Mameli
author_facet Lisa Bortolotti
Matteo Mameli
author_sort Lisa Bortolotti
collection DOAJ
description To what extent do self-deception and delusion overlap? In this paper we argue that both self-deception and delusions can be understood in folk-psychological terms. “Motivated” delusions, just like self-deception, can be described as beliefs driven by personal interests. If self-deception can be understood folk-psychologically because of its motivational component, so can motivated delusions. Non-motivated delusions also fit (to a large extent) the folk-psychological notion of belief, since they can be described as hypotheses one endorses when attempting to make sense of unusual and powerful experiences. We suggest that there is continuity between the epistemic irrationality manifested in self-deception and in delusion.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T20:34:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-897606e154d04d34839d54e8c051ef90
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1972-1293
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T20:34:41Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente
record_format Article
series Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
spelling doaj.art-897606e154d04d34839d54e8c051ef902022-12-22T00:51:42ZengAssociazione Culturale Humana.MenteHumana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies1972-12932018-06-01520Self-Deception, Delusion and the Boundaries of Folk PsychologyLisa Bortolotti0Matteo Mameli1University of Birmingham, UK, and Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, AustraliaKing’s College London, UKTo what extent do self-deception and delusion overlap? In this paper we argue that both self-deception and delusions can be understood in folk-psychological terms. “Motivated” delusions, just like self-deception, can be described as beliefs driven by personal interests. If self-deception can be understood folk-psychologically because of its motivational component, so can motivated delusions. Non-motivated delusions also fit (to a large extent) the folk-psychological notion of belief, since they can be described as hypotheses one endorses when attempting to make sense of unusual and powerful experiences. We suggest that there is continuity between the epistemic irrationality manifested in self-deception and in delusion.http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/201self-deceptionself-delusionfolk-psychology
spellingShingle Lisa Bortolotti
Matteo Mameli
Self-Deception, Delusion and the Boundaries of Folk Psychology
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
self-deception
self-delusion
folk-psychology
title Self-Deception, Delusion and the Boundaries of Folk Psychology
title_full Self-Deception, Delusion and the Boundaries of Folk Psychology
title_fullStr Self-Deception, Delusion and the Boundaries of Folk Psychology
title_full_unstemmed Self-Deception, Delusion and the Boundaries of Folk Psychology
title_short Self-Deception, Delusion and the Boundaries of Folk Psychology
title_sort self deception delusion and the boundaries of folk psychology
topic self-deception
self-delusion
folk-psychology
url http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/201
work_keys_str_mv AT lisabortolotti selfdeceptiondelusionandtheboundariesoffolkpsychology
AT matteomameli selfdeceptiondelusionandtheboundariesoffolkpsychology