The Securitization of Refugee Movements in Contemporary Politics

Securitization implies moving a situation up the security agenda of a state, so as to perceive it as a potential existential threat to national security. This article attempts to analyze the post-cold war refugee situations in context of the securitization concerns they raised for states host...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Noorulain Naseem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for International Peace & Stability (CIPS) 2019-01-01
Series:NUST Journal of International Peace and Stability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://njips.nust.edu.pk/index.php/njips/article/view/23
_version_ 1797680903200178176
author Noorulain Naseem
author_facet Noorulain Naseem
author_sort Noorulain Naseem
collection DOAJ
description Securitization implies moving a situation up the security agenda of a state, so as to perceive it as a potential existential threat to national security. This article attempts to analyze the post-cold war refugee situations in context of the securitization concerns they raised for states hosting them. Here both the traditional and non-traditional contours of security are highlighted, including incidents of direct armed conflict between sending and receiving dyad, external intervention, infiltration or facilitation of trans-national movements across international borders and compromise of territorial integrity in the wake of these movements. The current narrative of persecution and accusation around refugee movements has led to unnecessary bias, directed towards those fleeing conflict zones. There is a need for a delicate balance between concerns of state and human security in the wake of these movements. This can help to understand why these seemingly humanitarian disasters have lately been identified as a securitization concern for host states in international politics. The analysis also uses social constructivism to establish the host state‟s challenges; which may account for as an incremental threat to the integrity of host state‟s ethnic, demographic and social constructs. The primary question that the paper seeks to address is to why and how these movements were able to raise security concerns, though they are usually associated with destitution and marginalization, yet lately have been associated with diffusing negative externalities of violent conflict zones across international borders.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:37:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-897a7168745f4ae1ac1872650ca512c8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2616-4426
2616-4434
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:37:01Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Centre for International Peace & Stability (CIPS)
record_format Article
series NUST Journal of International Peace and Stability
spelling doaj.art-897a7168745f4ae1ac1872650ca512c82023-09-19T22:07:38ZengCentre for International Peace & Stability (CIPS)NUST Journal of International Peace and Stability2616-44262616-44342019-01-012110.37540/njips.v2i1.23 The Securitization of Refugee Movements in Contemporary PoliticsNoorulain Naseem Securitization implies moving a situation up the security agenda of a state, so as to perceive it as a potential existential threat to national security. This article attempts to analyze the post-cold war refugee situations in context of the securitization concerns they raised for states hosting them. Here both the traditional and non-traditional contours of security are highlighted, including incidents of direct armed conflict between sending and receiving dyad, external intervention, infiltration or facilitation of trans-national movements across international borders and compromise of territorial integrity in the wake of these movements. The current narrative of persecution and accusation around refugee movements has led to unnecessary bias, directed towards those fleeing conflict zones. There is a need for a delicate balance between concerns of state and human security in the wake of these movements. This can help to understand why these seemingly humanitarian disasters have lately been identified as a securitization concern for host states in international politics. The analysis also uses social constructivism to establish the host state‟s challenges; which may account for as an incremental threat to the integrity of host state‟s ethnic, demographic and social constructs. The primary question that the paper seeks to address is to why and how these movements were able to raise security concerns, though they are usually associated with destitution and marginalization, yet lately have been associated with diffusing negative externalities of violent conflict zones across international borders. https://njips.nust.edu.pk/index.php/njips/article/view/23Refugee movementstrans-national rebel movementsethnic conflictinsurgencyterrorismsocial constructivism
spellingShingle Noorulain Naseem
The Securitization of Refugee Movements in Contemporary Politics
NUST Journal of International Peace and Stability
Refugee movements
trans-national rebel movements
ethnic conflict
insurgency
terrorism
social constructivism
title The Securitization of Refugee Movements in Contemporary Politics
title_full The Securitization of Refugee Movements in Contemporary Politics
title_fullStr The Securitization of Refugee Movements in Contemporary Politics
title_full_unstemmed The Securitization of Refugee Movements in Contemporary Politics
title_short The Securitization of Refugee Movements in Contemporary Politics
title_sort securitization of refugee movements in contemporary politics
topic Refugee movements
trans-national rebel movements
ethnic conflict
insurgency
terrorism
social constructivism
url https://njips.nust.edu.pk/index.php/njips/article/view/23
work_keys_str_mv AT noorulainnaseem thesecuritizationofrefugeemovementsincontemporarypolitics
AT noorulainnaseem securitizationofrefugeemovementsincontemporarypolitics