Concurrent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with high-fluence cross-linking versus laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis only in treatment of hyperopia

Purpose To compare refractive and corneal structural stability after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with and without concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking in the treatment of hyperopia. Patients and methods In an interventional prospective nonrandomized comparative study,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed M Eid, Ahmed A Abdelghany, Ahmed S Abdelhalim, Ahmed M Sabry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2019;volume=112;issue=4;spage=117;epage=121;aulast=Eid
_version_ 1818926664628830208
author Ahmed M Eid
Ahmed A Abdelghany
Ahmed S Abdelhalim
Ahmed M Sabry
author_facet Ahmed M Eid
Ahmed A Abdelghany
Ahmed S Abdelhalim
Ahmed M Sabry
author_sort Ahmed M Eid
collection DOAJ
description Purpose To compare refractive and corneal structural stability after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with and without concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking in the treatment of hyperopia. Patients and methods In an interventional prospective nonrandomized comparative study, 50 eyes of 25 patients with hyperopia (+1 D to +6 D) or hyperopic astigmatism (up to 4 D) underwent customized LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking in the right eye (group A) and customized LASIK only in the left eye (group B). Main outcome measures included postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest and cycloplegic refractive spherical equivalent, keratometric readings, and spherical aberrations throughout the 2 years of postoperative follow-up. Results There were statistically significant changes in all studied parameters between preoperative and postoperative follow-up at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years in both groups, and these changes remained stable in group A throughout the follow-up period. UCVA was statistically significantly better in group A compared with group B at 3 months (P=0.02). In group B, UCVA was highly statistically significant better at 1 year compared with that at 3 months (P=0.005). Conclusion LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high-fluence has better visual outcomes and stability compared with LASIK alone in the treatment of hyperopia.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T03:00:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-897b386eabb3474aa3a9c540ab9c3b12
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-0686
2314-6648
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T03:00:43Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
spelling doaj.art-897b386eabb3474aa3a9c540ab9c3b122022-12-21T19:55:45ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society2090-06862314-66482019-01-01112411712110.4103/ejos.ejos_38_19Concurrent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with high-fluence cross-linking versus laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis only in treatment of hyperopiaAhmed M EidAhmed A AbdelghanyAhmed S AbdelhalimAhmed M SabryPurpose To compare refractive and corneal structural stability after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with and without concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking in the treatment of hyperopia. Patients and methods In an interventional prospective nonrandomized comparative study, 50 eyes of 25 patients with hyperopia (+1 D to +6 D) or hyperopic astigmatism (up to 4 D) underwent customized LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking in the right eye (group A) and customized LASIK only in the left eye (group B). Main outcome measures included postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest and cycloplegic refractive spherical equivalent, keratometric readings, and spherical aberrations throughout the 2 years of postoperative follow-up. Results There were statistically significant changes in all studied parameters between preoperative and postoperative follow-up at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years in both groups, and these changes remained stable in group A throughout the follow-up period. UCVA was statistically significantly better in group A compared with group B at 3 months (P=0.02). In group B, UCVA was highly statistically significant better at 1 year compared with that at 3 months (P=0.005). Conclusion LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high-fluence has better visual outcomes and stability compared with LASIK alone in the treatment of hyperopia.http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2019;volume=112;issue=4;spage=117;epage=121;aulast=Eidcollagen cross-linking and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis reoperationshyperopialaser-assisted in situ keratomileusispost-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis regression
spellingShingle Ahmed M Eid
Ahmed A Abdelghany
Ahmed S Abdelhalim
Ahmed M Sabry
Concurrent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with high-fluence cross-linking versus laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis only in treatment of hyperopia
Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
collagen cross-linking and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis reoperations
hyperopia
laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis regression
title Concurrent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with high-fluence cross-linking versus laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis only in treatment of hyperopia
title_full Concurrent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with high-fluence cross-linking versus laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis only in treatment of hyperopia
title_fullStr Concurrent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with high-fluence cross-linking versus laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis only in treatment of hyperopia
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with high-fluence cross-linking versus laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis only in treatment of hyperopia
title_short Concurrent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with high-fluence cross-linking versus laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis only in treatment of hyperopia
title_sort concurrent laser assisted in situ keratomileusis with high fluence cross linking versus laser assisted in situ keratomileusis only in treatment of hyperopia
topic collagen cross-linking and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis reoperations
hyperopia
laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis regression
url http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2019;volume=112;issue=4;spage=117;epage=121;aulast=Eid
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedmeid concurrentlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithhighfluencecrosslinkingversuslaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisonlyintreatmentofhyperopia
AT ahmedaabdelghany concurrentlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithhighfluencecrosslinkingversuslaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisonlyintreatmentofhyperopia
AT ahmedsabdelhalim concurrentlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithhighfluencecrosslinkingversuslaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisonlyintreatmentofhyperopia
AT ahmedmsabry concurrentlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusiswithhighfluencecrosslinkingversuslaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisonlyintreatmentofhyperopia