PROGRAM FOR ONCOLOGY WELLNESS AND EXERCISE REHABILITATION (POWER): A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ONCOLOGY REHABILITATION IN THE COMMUNITY

Background Multi-disciplinary, exercise-based, oncology rehabilitation improves outcomes for cancer survivors. However, most programs currently exist in hospital settings and there is limited access to rehabilitation in the community. Community-based programs may improve access and outcomes but...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Germaine A Tan, Amy M Dennett, Dharani Nagarajan, Jessica Freeman, Casey L Peiris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Edisciences 2020-11-01
Series:Journal of Cancer Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.edisciences.org/scheda-j018
_version_ 1818607974233407488
author Germaine A Tan
Amy M Dennett
Dharani Nagarajan
Jessica Freeman
Casey L Peiris
author_facet Germaine A Tan
Amy M Dennett
Dharani Nagarajan
Jessica Freeman
Casey L Peiris
author_sort Germaine A Tan
collection DOAJ
description Background Multi-disciplinary, exercise-based, oncology rehabilitation improves outcomes for cancer survivors. However, most programs currently exist in hospital settings and there is limited access to rehabilitation in the community. Community-based programs may improve access and outcomes but the feasibility of implementing multi-disciplinary rehabilitation in this setting is unknown. Aim To assess the feasibility of implementing an innovative, multi-disciplinary, multi-site exercise-based oncology rehabilitation program in the community. Method A prospective feasibility study focussed on demand, implementation, acceptability, and limited efficacy was conducted. The Program for Oncology Wellness and Exercise Rehabilitation (POWER) comprised twice-weekly group exercise, fortnightly education and individual counselling for cancer survivors over 12-weeks. Limited efficacy testing was completed by calculating mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes including the Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale, EORTC-QLQ30, Brief Fatigue Inventory, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and 5 times sit-to-stand test (5STS). Results Over 10 months, 65 referrals were received. Twenty-four participants [mean age 62 (SD 12) years, median 9 (range 2 to 120) months post-cancer diagnosis] completed the program. Overall, 73% of scheduled exercise sessions were attended. Participants improved physical function (6MWT MD 98.5m, 95%CI 64m to 134m, 5STS MD -4.5s, 95%CI -7.8s to -1.1s), self-efficacy (MD 1.1 points, 95%CI 0.2 to 2.4) and fatigue (MD -1.1 points, 95%CI -2.2 to 0.0). No adverse events were reported. Challenges faced in this setting included funding sustainability and cost. Enabling factors included in-kind support from the organisation and convenience of location. Conclusion Community-based oncology rehabilitation programs are safe and feasible and may facilitate ongoing positive behaviour change and self-management in cancer survivors beyond hospital- based rehabilitation.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:35:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8984c78a363d416787085ace45a143fa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2704-6494
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:35:16Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Edisciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Cancer Rehabilitation
spelling doaj.art-8984c78a363d416787085ace45a143fa2022-12-21T22:28:06ZengEdisciencesJournal of Cancer Rehabilitation2704-64942020-11-01313039https://doi.org/10.48252/JCR1PROGRAM FOR ONCOLOGY WELLNESS AND EXERCISE REHABILITATION (POWER): A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ONCOLOGY REHABILITATION IN THE COMMUNITYGermaine A Tan0Amy M Dennett1Dharani Nagarajan2Jessica Freeman3Casey L Peiris4BPhysio MannaCare, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaPhD Eastern Health, Allied Health Clinical Research Office, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia La Trobe University, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaAppSc(Physio), GradCertHlthServMt, MPH MannaCare, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaMClinExPhys MannaCare, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaPhD La Trobe University, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaBackground Multi-disciplinary, exercise-based, oncology rehabilitation improves outcomes for cancer survivors. However, most programs currently exist in hospital settings and there is limited access to rehabilitation in the community. Community-based programs may improve access and outcomes but the feasibility of implementing multi-disciplinary rehabilitation in this setting is unknown. Aim To assess the feasibility of implementing an innovative, multi-disciplinary, multi-site exercise-based oncology rehabilitation program in the community. Method A prospective feasibility study focussed on demand, implementation, acceptability, and limited efficacy was conducted. The Program for Oncology Wellness and Exercise Rehabilitation (POWER) comprised twice-weekly group exercise, fortnightly education and individual counselling for cancer survivors over 12-weeks. Limited efficacy testing was completed by calculating mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes including the Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale, EORTC-QLQ30, Brief Fatigue Inventory, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and 5 times sit-to-stand test (5STS). Results Over 10 months, 65 referrals were received. Twenty-four participants [mean age 62 (SD 12) years, median 9 (range 2 to 120) months post-cancer diagnosis] completed the program. Overall, 73% of scheduled exercise sessions were attended. Participants improved physical function (6MWT MD 98.5m, 95%CI 64m to 134m, 5STS MD -4.5s, 95%CI -7.8s to -1.1s), self-efficacy (MD 1.1 points, 95%CI 0.2 to 2.4) and fatigue (MD -1.1 points, 95%CI -2.2 to 0.0). No adverse events were reported. Challenges faced in this setting included funding sustainability and cost. Enabling factors included in-kind support from the organisation and convenience of location. Conclusion Community-based oncology rehabilitation programs are safe and feasible and may facilitate ongoing positive behaviour change and self-management in cancer survivors beyond hospital- based rehabilitation.https://www.edisciences.org/scheda-j018cancerrehabilitationexercisecommunitysurvivorshipimplementation
spellingShingle Germaine A Tan
Amy M Dennett
Dharani Nagarajan
Jessica Freeman
Casey L Peiris
PROGRAM FOR ONCOLOGY WELLNESS AND EXERCISE REHABILITATION (POWER): A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ONCOLOGY REHABILITATION IN THE COMMUNITY
Journal of Cancer Rehabilitation
cancer
rehabilitation
exercise
community
survivorship
implementation
title PROGRAM FOR ONCOLOGY WELLNESS AND EXERCISE REHABILITATION (POWER): A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ONCOLOGY REHABILITATION IN THE COMMUNITY
title_full PROGRAM FOR ONCOLOGY WELLNESS AND EXERCISE REHABILITATION (POWER): A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ONCOLOGY REHABILITATION IN THE COMMUNITY
title_fullStr PROGRAM FOR ONCOLOGY WELLNESS AND EXERCISE REHABILITATION (POWER): A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ONCOLOGY REHABILITATION IN THE COMMUNITY
title_full_unstemmed PROGRAM FOR ONCOLOGY WELLNESS AND EXERCISE REHABILITATION (POWER): A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ONCOLOGY REHABILITATION IN THE COMMUNITY
title_short PROGRAM FOR ONCOLOGY WELLNESS AND EXERCISE REHABILITATION (POWER): A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ONCOLOGY REHABILITATION IN THE COMMUNITY
title_sort program for oncology wellness and exercise rehabilitation power a feasibility study of oncology rehabilitation in the community
topic cancer
rehabilitation
exercise
community
survivorship
implementation
url https://www.edisciences.org/scheda-j018
work_keys_str_mv AT germaineatan programforoncologywellnessandexerciserehabilitationpowerafeasibilitystudyofoncologyrehabilitationinthecommunity
AT amymdennett programforoncologywellnessandexerciserehabilitationpowerafeasibilitystudyofoncologyrehabilitationinthecommunity
AT dharaninagarajan programforoncologywellnessandexerciserehabilitationpowerafeasibilitystudyofoncologyrehabilitationinthecommunity
AT jessicafreeman programforoncologywellnessandexerciserehabilitationpowerafeasibilitystudyofoncologyrehabilitationinthecommunity
AT caseylpeiris programforoncologywellnessandexerciserehabilitationpowerafeasibilitystudyofoncologyrehabilitationinthecommunity