Biogeography and ecology of geographically distant populations of sibling Cryptocephalus leaf beetles

Different populations of two closely related species, Cryptocephalusflavipes and C. bameuli, from western (Alps, Apennines and Pyrenees) and central Europe (Poland, Ukraine and Pannonia) were analysed. On the basis of DNA sequences from two genes, cox1 and ef1-α, distinctiveness of both species was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Kubisz, G. Magoga, M. A. Mazur, M. Montagna, R. Ścibior, P. Tykarski, Ł. Kajtoch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:The European Zoological Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2020.1752832
_version_ 1818610207498960896
author D. Kubisz
G. Magoga
M. A. Mazur
M. Montagna
R. Ścibior
P. Tykarski
Ł. Kajtoch
author_facet D. Kubisz
G. Magoga
M. A. Mazur
M. Montagna
R. Ścibior
P. Tykarski
Ł. Kajtoch
author_sort D. Kubisz
collection DOAJ
description Different populations of two closely related species, Cryptocephalusflavipes and C. bameuli, from western (Alps, Apennines and Pyrenees) and central Europe (Poland, Ukraine and Pannonia) were analysed. On the basis of DNA sequences from two genes, cox1 and ef1-α, distinctiveness of both species was confirmed. Nevertheless, possible hybrids were identified in Carpathian mountains. We found a significant genetic differentiation among populations of C. flavipes and C. bameuli from distant regions but a high genetic similarity between populations of C. bameuli from north and south of the Carpathians. Demographic estimates suggest a past population expansion in the case of C. bameuli and a recent one for C. flavipes, possibly occurred during Pleistocene and Holocene, respectively. Distribution modelling showed that C. flavipes is typically present in the mountain systems, whereas C. bameuli is associated with hilly areas of central and eastern Europe. Based on the present data, Last Glacial Maximum refugia of both species were located in the Alpine region and Black Sea coasts, but on different elevations. The characterization of the insect diet, through a DNA metabarcoding approach targeting the trnL plant intron, demonstrated a significant differentiation of food preferences between the two species, as well as between geographic populations within the species.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T15:10:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-898cf1d2063e48b59e1438a8b5f2eda7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2475-0263
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T15:10:46Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series The European Zoological Journal
spelling doaj.art-898cf1d2063e48b59e1438a8b5f2eda72022-12-21T22:26:58ZengTaylor & Francis GroupThe European Zoological Journal2475-02632020-01-0187122323410.1080/24750263.2020.17528321752832Biogeography and ecology of geographically distant populations of sibling Cryptocephalus leaf beetlesD. Kubisz0G. Magoga1M. A. Mazur2M. Montagna3R. Ścibior4P. Tykarski5Ł. Kajtoch6Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals Polish Academy of SciencesUniversità degli Studi di MilanoUniversity of OpoleUniversità degli Studi di MilanoUniversity of Life Sciences in LublinUniversity of WarsawInstitute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals Polish Academy of SciencesDifferent populations of two closely related species, Cryptocephalusflavipes and C. bameuli, from western (Alps, Apennines and Pyrenees) and central Europe (Poland, Ukraine and Pannonia) were analysed. On the basis of DNA sequences from two genes, cox1 and ef1-α, distinctiveness of both species was confirmed. Nevertheless, possible hybrids were identified in Carpathian mountains. We found a significant genetic differentiation among populations of C. flavipes and C. bameuli from distant regions but a high genetic similarity between populations of C. bameuli from north and south of the Carpathians. Demographic estimates suggest a past population expansion in the case of C. bameuli and a recent one for C. flavipes, possibly occurred during Pleistocene and Holocene, respectively. Distribution modelling showed that C. flavipes is typically present in the mountain systems, whereas C. bameuli is associated with hilly areas of central and eastern Europe. Based on the present data, Last Glacial Maximum refugia of both species were located in the Alpine region and Black Sea coasts, but on different elevations. The characterization of the insect diet, through a DNA metabarcoding approach targeting the trnL plant intron, demonstrated a significant differentiation of food preferences between the two species, as well as between geographic populations within the species.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2020.1752832chrysomelidaecoleopterahybridizationmolecular ecologyphylogeographyniche modelling
spellingShingle D. Kubisz
G. Magoga
M. A. Mazur
M. Montagna
R. Ścibior
P. Tykarski
Ł. Kajtoch
Biogeography and ecology of geographically distant populations of sibling Cryptocephalus leaf beetles
The European Zoological Journal
chrysomelidae
coleoptera
hybridization
molecular ecology
phylogeography
niche modelling
title Biogeography and ecology of geographically distant populations of sibling Cryptocephalus leaf beetles
title_full Biogeography and ecology of geographically distant populations of sibling Cryptocephalus leaf beetles
title_fullStr Biogeography and ecology of geographically distant populations of sibling Cryptocephalus leaf beetles
title_full_unstemmed Biogeography and ecology of geographically distant populations of sibling Cryptocephalus leaf beetles
title_short Biogeography and ecology of geographically distant populations of sibling Cryptocephalus leaf beetles
title_sort biogeography and ecology of geographically distant populations of sibling cryptocephalus leaf beetles
topic chrysomelidae
coleoptera
hybridization
molecular ecology
phylogeography
niche modelling
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2020.1752832
work_keys_str_mv AT dkubisz biogeographyandecologyofgeographicallydistantpopulationsofsiblingcryptocephalusleafbeetles
AT gmagoga biogeographyandecologyofgeographicallydistantpopulationsofsiblingcryptocephalusleafbeetles
AT mamazur biogeographyandecologyofgeographicallydistantpopulationsofsiblingcryptocephalusleafbeetles
AT mmontagna biogeographyandecologyofgeographicallydistantpopulationsofsiblingcryptocephalusleafbeetles
AT rscibior biogeographyandecologyofgeographicallydistantpopulationsofsiblingcryptocephalusleafbeetles
AT ptykarski biogeographyandecologyofgeographicallydistantpopulationsofsiblingcryptocephalusleafbeetles
AT łkajtoch biogeographyandecologyofgeographicallydistantpopulationsofsiblingcryptocephalusleafbeetles