Were Frailty Identification Criteria Created Equal? A Comparative Case Study on Continuous Non-Invasively Collected Neurocardiovascular Signals during an Active Standing Test in the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

Background: In this observational study, we compared continuous physiological signals during an active standing test in adults aged 50 years and over, characterised as frail by three different criteria, using data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Methods: This study utilised data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Feng Xue, Silvin Knight, Emma Connolly, Aisling O’Halloran, Morgana Afonso Shirsath, Louise Newman, Eoin Duggan, Rose Anne Kenny, Roman Romero-Ortuno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/2/442
_version_ 1797339420726132736
author Feng Xue
Silvin Knight
Emma Connolly
Aisling O’Halloran
Morgana Afonso Shirsath
Louise Newman
Eoin Duggan
Rose Anne Kenny
Roman Romero-Ortuno
author_facet Feng Xue
Silvin Knight
Emma Connolly
Aisling O’Halloran
Morgana Afonso Shirsath
Louise Newman
Eoin Duggan
Rose Anne Kenny
Roman Romero-Ortuno
author_sort Feng Xue
collection DOAJ
description Background: In this observational study, we compared continuous physiological signals during an active standing test in adults aged 50 years and over, characterised as frail by three different criteria, using data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Methods: This study utilised data from TILDA, an ongoing landmark prospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults aged 50 years or older in Ireland. The initial sampling strategy in TILDA was based on random geodirectory sampling. Four independent groups were identified: those characterised as frail only by one of the frailty tools used (the physical Frailty Phenotype (FP), the 32-item Frailty Index (FI), or the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) classification tree), and a fourth group where participants were not characterised as frail by any of these tools. Continuous non-invasive physiological signals were collected during an active standing test, including systolic (sBP) and diastolic (dBP) blood pressure, as well as heart rate (HR), using digital artery photoplethysmography. Additionally, the frontal lobe cerebral oxygenation (Oxy), deoxygenation (Deoxy), and tissue saturation index (TSI) were also non-invasively measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The signals were visualised across frailty groups and statistically compared using one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Results: A total of 1124 participants (mean age of 63.5 years; 50.2% women) were included: 23 were characterised as frail only by the FP, 97 by the FI, 38 by the CFS, and 966 by none of these criteria. The SPM analyses revealed that only the group characterised as frail by the FI had significantly different signals (<i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to the non-frail group. Specifically, they exhibited an attenuated gain in HR between 10 and 15 s post-stand and larger deficits in sBP and dBP between 15 and 20 s post-stand. Conclusions: The FI proved to be more adept at capturing distinct physiological responses to standing, likely due to its direct inclusion of cardiovascular morbidities in its definition. Significant differences were observed in the dynamics of cardiovascular signals among the frail populations identified by different frailty criteria, suggesting that caution should be taken when employing frailty identification tools on physiological signals, particularly the neurocardiovascular signals in an active standing test.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:47:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-89962d27b04b4adeb9e72300dc60c8e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:47:21Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-89962d27b04b4adeb9e72300dc60c8e52024-01-29T14:14:46ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202024-01-0124244210.3390/s24020442Were Frailty Identification Criteria Created Equal? A Comparative Case Study on Continuous Non-Invasively Collected Neurocardiovascular Signals during an Active Standing Test in the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)Feng Xue0Silvin Knight1Emma Connolly2Aisling O’Halloran3Morgana Afonso Shirsath4Louise Newman5Eoin Duggan6Rose Anne Kenny7Roman Romero-Ortuno8Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, IrelandDiscipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, IrelandDiscipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, IrelandDiscipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, IrelandDiscipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, IrelandDiscipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, IrelandDiscipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, IrelandDiscipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, IrelandDiscipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, IrelandBackground: In this observational study, we compared continuous physiological signals during an active standing test in adults aged 50 years and over, characterised as frail by three different criteria, using data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Methods: This study utilised data from TILDA, an ongoing landmark prospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults aged 50 years or older in Ireland. The initial sampling strategy in TILDA was based on random geodirectory sampling. Four independent groups were identified: those characterised as frail only by one of the frailty tools used (the physical Frailty Phenotype (FP), the 32-item Frailty Index (FI), or the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) classification tree), and a fourth group where participants were not characterised as frail by any of these tools. Continuous non-invasive physiological signals were collected during an active standing test, including systolic (sBP) and diastolic (dBP) blood pressure, as well as heart rate (HR), using digital artery photoplethysmography. Additionally, the frontal lobe cerebral oxygenation (Oxy), deoxygenation (Deoxy), and tissue saturation index (TSI) were also non-invasively measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The signals were visualised across frailty groups and statistically compared using one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Results: A total of 1124 participants (mean age of 63.5 years; 50.2% women) were included: 23 were characterised as frail only by the FP, 97 by the FI, 38 by the CFS, and 966 by none of these criteria. The SPM analyses revealed that only the group characterised as frail by the FI had significantly different signals (<i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to the non-frail group. Specifically, they exhibited an attenuated gain in HR between 10 and 15 s post-stand and larger deficits in sBP and dBP between 15 and 20 s post-stand. Conclusions: The FI proved to be more adept at capturing distinct physiological responses to standing, likely due to its direct inclusion of cardiovascular morbidities in its definition. Significant differences were observed in the dynamics of cardiovascular signals among the frail populations identified by different frailty criteria, suggesting that caution should be taken when employing frailty identification tools on physiological signals, particularly the neurocardiovascular signals in an active standing test.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/2/442frailty indexfrailty phenotypeclinical frailty scaleactive standcontinuous physiological monitoringneurovascular
spellingShingle Feng Xue
Silvin Knight
Emma Connolly
Aisling O’Halloran
Morgana Afonso Shirsath
Louise Newman
Eoin Duggan
Rose Anne Kenny
Roman Romero-Ortuno
Were Frailty Identification Criteria Created Equal? A Comparative Case Study on Continuous Non-Invasively Collected Neurocardiovascular Signals during an Active Standing Test in the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)
Sensors
frailty index
frailty phenotype
clinical frailty scale
active stand
continuous physiological monitoring
neurovascular
title Were Frailty Identification Criteria Created Equal? A Comparative Case Study on Continuous Non-Invasively Collected Neurocardiovascular Signals during an Active Standing Test in the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)
title_full Were Frailty Identification Criteria Created Equal? A Comparative Case Study on Continuous Non-Invasively Collected Neurocardiovascular Signals during an Active Standing Test in the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)
title_fullStr Were Frailty Identification Criteria Created Equal? A Comparative Case Study on Continuous Non-Invasively Collected Neurocardiovascular Signals during an Active Standing Test in the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)
title_full_unstemmed Were Frailty Identification Criteria Created Equal? A Comparative Case Study on Continuous Non-Invasively Collected Neurocardiovascular Signals during an Active Standing Test in the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)
title_short Were Frailty Identification Criteria Created Equal? A Comparative Case Study on Continuous Non-Invasively Collected Neurocardiovascular Signals during an Active Standing Test in the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)
title_sort were frailty identification criteria created equal a comparative case study on continuous non invasively collected neurocardiovascular signals during an active standing test in the irish longitudinal study on ageing tilda
topic frailty index
frailty phenotype
clinical frailty scale
active stand
continuous physiological monitoring
neurovascular
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/2/442
work_keys_str_mv AT fengxue werefrailtyidentificationcriteriacreatedequalacomparativecasestudyoncontinuousnoninvasivelycollectedneurocardiovascularsignalsduringanactivestandingtestintheirishlongitudinalstudyonageingtilda
AT silvinknight werefrailtyidentificationcriteriacreatedequalacomparativecasestudyoncontinuousnoninvasivelycollectedneurocardiovascularsignalsduringanactivestandingtestintheirishlongitudinalstudyonageingtilda
AT emmaconnolly werefrailtyidentificationcriteriacreatedequalacomparativecasestudyoncontinuousnoninvasivelycollectedneurocardiovascularsignalsduringanactivestandingtestintheirishlongitudinalstudyonageingtilda
AT aislingohalloran werefrailtyidentificationcriteriacreatedequalacomparativecasestudyoncontinuousnoninvasivelycollectedneurocardiovascularsignalsduringanactivestandingtestintheirishlongitudinalstudyonageingtilda
AT morganaafonsoshirsath werefrailtyidentificationcriteriacreatedequalacomparativecasestudyoncontinuousnoninvasivelycollectedneurocardiovascularsignalsduringanactivestandingtestintheirishlongitudinalstudyonageingtilda
AT louisenewman werefrailtyidentificationcriteriacreatedequalacomparativecasestudyoncontinuousnoninvasivelycollectedneurocardiovascularsignalsduringanactivestandingtestintheirishlongitudinalstudyonageingtilda
AT eoinduggan werefrailtyidentificationcriteriacreatedequalacomparativecasestudyoncontinuousnoninvasivelycollectedneurocardiovascularsignalsduringanactivestandingtestintheirishlongitudinalstudyonageingtilda
AT roseannekenny werefrailtyidentificationcriteriacreatedequalacomparativecasestudyoncontinuousnoninvasivelycollectedneurocardiovascularsignalsduringanactivestandingtestintheirishlongitudinalstudyonageingtilda
AT romanromeroortuno werefrailtyidentificationcriteriacreatedequalacomparativecasestudyoncontinuousnoninvasivelycollectedneurocardiovascularsignalsduringanactivestandingtestintheirishlongitudinalstudyonageingtilda