Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In clinical practice and in clinical trials, echocardiography and scintigraphy are used the most for the evaluation of global left ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular (LV) volumes. Actually, poor quality imaging and geometr...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2009-06-01
|
| Series: | Cardiovascular Ultrasound |
| Online Access: | http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/7/1/27 |
| _version_ | 1811277750557736960 |
|---|---|
| author | Cosyns Bernard Haberman David Droogmans Steven Warzée Sandrine Mahieu Philippe Laurent Eric Moonen Marie Hernot Sophie Lancellotti Patrizio |
| author_facet | Cosyns Bernard Haberman David Droogmans Steven Warzée Sandrine Mahieu Philippe Laurent Eric Moonen Marie Hernot Sophie Lancellotti Patrizio |
| author_sort | Cosyns Bernard |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In clinical practice and in clinical trials, echocardiography and scintigraphy are used the most for the evaluation of global left ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular (LV) volumes. Actually, poor quality imaging and geometrical assumptions are the main limitations of LVEF measured by echocardiography. Contrast agents and 3D echocardiography are new methods that may alleviate these potential limitations.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Therefore we sought to examine the accuracy of contrast 3D echocardiography for the evaluation of LV volumes and LVEF relative to MIBI gated SPECT as an independent reference. In 43 patients addressed for chest pain, contrast 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) and MIBI gated SPECT were prospectively performed on the same day. The accuracy and the variability of LV volumes and LVEF measurements were evaluated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Due to good endocardial delineation, LV volumes and LVEF measurements by contrast RT3DE were feasible in 99% of the patients. The mean LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) of the group by scintigraphy was 143 ± 65 mL and was underestimated by triplane contrast RT3DE (128 ± 60 mL; p < 0.001) and less by full-volume contrast RT3DE (132 ± 62 mL; p < 0.001). Limits of agreement with scintigraphy were similar for triplane andfull-volume, modalities with the best results for full-volume. Results were similar for calculation of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV). The mean LVEF was 44 ± 16% with scintigraphy and was not significantly different with both triplane contrast RT3DE (45 ± 15%) and full-volume contrast RT3DE (45 ± 15%). There was an excellent correlation between two different observers for LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF measurements and inter observer agreement was also good for both contrast RT3DE techniques.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Contrast RT3DE allows an accurate assessment of LVEF compared to the LVEF measured by SPECT, and shows low variability between observers. Although RT3DE triplane provides accurate evaluation of left ventricular function, RT3DE full-volume is superior to triplane modality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T00:23:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-89acc4d4386c43c79a2f7f535b8bbacc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1476-7120 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T00:23:43Z |
| publishDate | 2009-06-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cardiovascular Ultrasound |
| spelling | doaj.art-89acc4d4386c43c79a2f7f535b8bbacc2022-12-22T03:10:42ZengBMCCardiovascular Ultrasound1476-71202009-06-01712710.1186/1476-7120-7-27Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular functionCosyns BernardHaberman DavidDroogmans StevenWarzée SandrineMahieu PhilippeLaurent EricMoonen MarieHernot SophieLancellotti Patrizio<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In clinical practice and in clinical trials, echocardiography and scintigraphy are used the most for the evaluation of global left ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular (LV) volumes. Actually, poor quality imaging and geometrical assumptions are the main limitations of LVEF measured by echocardiography. Contrast agents and 3D echocardiography are new methods that may alleviate these potential limitations.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Therefore we sought to examine the accuracy of contrast 3D echocardiography for the evaluation of LV volumes and LVEF relative to MIBI gated SPECT as an independent reference. In 43 patients addressed for chest pain, contrast 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) and MIBI gated SPECT were prospectively performed on the same day. The accuracy and the variability of LV volumes and LVEF measurements were evaluated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Due to good endocardial delineation, LV volumes and LVEF measurements by contrast RT3DE were feasible in 99% of the patients. The mean LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) of the group by scintigraphy was 143 ± 65 mL and was underestimated by triplane contrast RT3DE (128 ± 60 mL; p < 0.001) and less by full-volume contrast RT3DE (132 ± 62 mL; p < 0.001). Limits of agreement with scintigraphy were similar for triplane andfull-volume, modalities with the best results for full-volume. Results were similar for calculation of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV). The mean LVEF was 44 ± 16% with scintigraphy and was not significantly different with both triplane contrast RT3DE (45 ± 15%) and full-volume contrast RT3DE (45 ± 15%). There was an excellent correlation between two different observers for LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF measurements and inter observer agreement was also good for both contrast RT3DE techniques.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Contrast RT3DE allows an accurate assessment of LVEF compared to the LVEF measured by SPECT, and shows low variability between observers. Although RT3DE triplane provides accurate evaluation of left ventricular function, RT3DE full-volume is superior to triplane modality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.</p>http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/7/1/27 |
| spellingShingle | Cosyns Bernard Haberman David Droogmans Steven Warzée Sandrine Mahieu Philippe Laurent Eric Moonen Marie Hernot Sophie Lancellotti Patrizio Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function Cardiovascular Ultrasound |
| title | Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function |
| title_full | Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function |
| title_short | Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function |
| title_sort | comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with mibi gated spect for the evaluation of left ventricular function |
| url | http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/7/1/27 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cosynsbernard comparisonofcontrastenhancedthreedimensionalechocardiographywithmibigatedspectfortheevaluationofleftventricularfunction AT habermandavid comparisonofcontrastenhancedthreedimensionalechocardiographywithmibigatedspectfortheevaluationofleftventricularfunction AT droogmanssteven comparisonofcontrastenhancedthreedimensionalechocardiographywithmibigatedspectfortheevaluationofleftventricularfunction AT warzeesandrine comparisonofcontrastenhancedthreedimensionalechocardiographywithmibigatedspectfortheevaluationofleftventricularfunction AT mahieuphilippe comparisonofcontrastenhancedthreedimensionalechocardiographywithmibigatedspectfortheevaluationofleftventricularfunction AT laurenteric comparisonofcontrastenhancedthreedimensionalechocardiographywithmibigatedspectfortheevaluationofleftventricularfunction AT moonenmarie comparisonofcontrastenhancedthreedimensionalechocardiographywithmibigatedspectfortheevaluationofleftventricularfunction AT hernotsophie comparisonofcontrastenhancedthreedimensionalechocardiographywithmibigatedspectfortheevaluationofleftventricularfunction AT lancellottipatrizio comparisonofcontrastenhancedthreedimensionalechocardiographywithmibigatedspectfortheevaluationofleftventricularfunction |