Phosphorıc Acıd Etchıng Vs. Sandblastıng Of Enamel For Dırect Bondıng Of Metallıc Orthodontıc Brackets
This study compared two methods of enamel conditioning; acid etching and sandblasting in terms of bond strengths yielded and type of failures occurred. Forty non-carious premolars extracted with orthodontic indication were used. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 20 each and were emb...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Galenos Yayinevi
2001-12-01
|
Series: | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/phosphorc-acd-etchng-vs-sandblastng-of-enamel-for-/53984
|
_version_ | 1827888611149742080 |
---|---|
author | Zafer Sarı Serdar Üşümez Tancan Uysal |
author_facet | Zafer Sarı Serdar Üşümez Tancan Uysal |
author_sort | Zafer Sarı |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study compared two methods of enamel conditioning; acid etching and sandblasting in terms of bond strengths yielded and type of failures occurred. Forty non-carious premolars extracted with orthodontic indication were used. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 20 each and were embedded in self cure acrylic in a vertical position so that the crowns were exposed. In the first group the teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid while 80 micron aluminum oxide particles were used in the other group. Stainless steel premolar brackets were bonded to all teeth with a standard procedure. Following thermocycling, the brackets were debonded with a chisel edge plunger in a universal test machine. Acid etching produced bond strength values of 8.2 ± 2.3 MPa which were statistically higher than that of produced by sandblasting; 6.8 ± 2.4 MPa. Our results indicate that sandblasting produced lower bond strength values with mainly adhesive type failure while all failure modes were observed in the acid etched sample. Sandblasting of enamel for enamel treatment is not advocated. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T20:37:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-89acd680ca484ded8947bcd21dbaa097 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2528-9659 2148-9505 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T20:37:18Z |
publishDate | 2001-12-01 |
publisher | Galenos Yayinevi |
record_format | Article |
series | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics |
spelling | doaj.art-89acd680ca484ded8947bcd21dbaa0972023-08-01T12:55:03ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052001-12-0114311912410.13076/1300-3550-14-3-11913049054Phosphorıc Acıd Etchıng Vs. Sandblastıng Of Enamel For Dırect Bondıng Of Metallıc Orthodontıc BracketsZafer Sarı0Serdar Üşümez1Tancan Uysal2 Selçuk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti A. D. Selçuk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti A. D. Selçuk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti A. D. This study compared two methods of enamel conditioning; acid etching and sandblasting in terms of bond strengths yielded and type of failures occurred. Forty non-carious premolars extracted with orthodontic indication were used. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 20 each and were embedded in self cure acrylic in a vertical position so that the crowns were exposed. In the first group the teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid while 80 micron aluminum oxide particles were used in the other group. Stainless steel premolar brackets were bonded to all teeth with a standard procedure. Following thermocycling, the brackets were debonded with a chisel edge plunger in a universal test machine. Acid etching produced bond strength values of 8.2 ± 2.3 MPa which were statistically higher than that of produced by sandblasting; 6.8 ± 2.4 MPa. Our results indicate that sandblasting produced lower bond strength values with mainly adhesive type failure while all failure modes were observed in the acid etched sample. Sandblasting of enamel for enamel treatment is not advocated. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/phosphorc-acd-etchng-vs-sandblastng-of-enamel-for-/53984 acid etchingsandblastingbond strength |
spellingShingle | Zafer Sarı Serdar Üşümez Tancan Uysal Phosphorıc Acıd Etchıng Vs. Sandblastıng Of Enamel For Dırect Bondıng Of Metallıc Orthodontıc Brackets Turkish Journal of Orthodontics acid etching sandblasting bond strength |
title | Phosphorıc Acıd Etchıng Vs. Sandblastıng Of Enamel For Dırect Bondıng Of Metallıc Orthodontıc Brackets |
title_full | Phosphorıc Acıd Etchıng Vs. Sandblastıng Of Enamel For Dırect Bondıng Of Metallıc Orthodontıc Brackets |
title_fullStr | Phosphorıc Acıd Etchıng Vs. Sandblastıng Of Enamel For Dırect Bondıng Of Metallıc Orthodontıc Brackets |
title_full_unstemmed | Phosphorıc Acıd Etchıng Vs. Sandblastıng Of Enamel For Dırect Bondıng Of Metallıc Orthodontıc Brackets |
title_short | Phosphorıc Acıd Etchıng Vs. Sandblastıng Of Enamel For Dırect Bondıng Of Metallıc Orthodontıc Brackets |
title_sort | phosphoric acid etching vs sandblasting of enamel for direct bonding of metallic orthodontic brackets |
topic | acid etching sandblasting bond strength |
url |
http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/phosphorc-acd-etchng-vs-sandblastng-of-enamel-for-/53984
|
work_keys_str_mv | AT zafersarı phosphorıcacıdetchıngvssandblastıngofenamelfordırectbondıngofmetallıcorthodontıcbrackets AT serdarusumez phosphorıcacıdetchıngvssandblastıngofenamelfordırectbondıngofmetallıcorthodontıcbrackets AT tancanuysal phosphorıcacıdetchıngvssandblastıngofenamelfordırectbondıngofmetallıcorthodontıcbrackets |