Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems

Abstract Background Diet is a key driver of equine hindgut microbial community structure and composition. The aim of this study was to characterize shifts in the fecal microbiota of grazing horses during transitions between forage types within integrated warm- (WSG) and cool-season grass (CSG) rotat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer R. Weinert-Nelson, Amy S. Biddle, Carey A. Williams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-06-01
Series:Animal Microbiome
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-022-00192-x
_version_ 1828808737135001600
author Jennifer R. Weinert-Nelson
Amy S. Biddle
Carey A. Williams
author_facet Jennifer R. Weinert-Nelson
Amy S. Biddle
Carey A. Williams
author_sort Jennifer R. Weinert-Nelson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Diet is a key driver of equine hindgut microbial community structure and composition. The aim of this study was to characterize shifts in the fecal microbiota of grazing horses during transitions between forage types within integrated warm- (WSG) and cool-season grass (CSG) rotational grazing systems (IRS). Eight mares were randomly assigned to two IRS containing mixed cool-season grass and one of two warm-season grasses: bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] or crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.]. Fecal samples were collected during transitions from CSG to WSG pasture sections (C–W) and WSG to CSG (W–C) on days 0, 2, 4, and 6 following pasture rotation and compared using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results Regardless of IRS or transition (C–W vs. W–C), species richness was greater on day 4 and 6 in comparison to day 0 (P < 0.05). Evenness, however, did not differ by day. Weighted UniFrac also did not differ by day, and the most influential factor impacting β-diversity was the individual horse (R2 ≥ 0.24; P = 0.0001). Random forest modeling was unable to accurately predict days within C–W and W–C, but could predict the individual horse based on microbial composition (accuracy: 0.92 ± 0.05). Only three differentially abundant bacterial co-abundance groups (BCG) were identified across days within all C–W and W–C for both IRS (W ≥ 126). The BCG differing by day for all transitions included amplicon sequence variants (ASV) assigned to bacterial groups with known fibrolytic and butyrate-producing functions including members of Lachnospiraceae, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Anaerovorax the NK4A214 group of Oscillospiraceae, and Sarcina maxima. In comparison, 38 BCG were identified as differentially abundant by horse (W ≥ 704). The ASV in these groups were most commonly assigned to genera associated with degradation of structural carbohydrates included Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, Treponema, Christensenellaceae R-7 group, and the NK4A214 group of Oscillospiraceae. Fecal pH also did not differ by day. Conclusions Overall, these results demonstrated a strong influence of individual horse on the fecal microbial community, particularly on the specific composition of fiber-degraders. The equine fecal microbiota were largely stable across transitions between forages within IRS suggesting that the equine gut microbiota adjusted at the individual level to the subtle dietary changes imposed by these transitions. This adaptive capacity indicates that horses can be managed in IRS without inducing gastrointestinal dysfunction.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:46:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-89ad7a11ef0742a5a519d6aa774a80aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2524-4671
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:46:06Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Animal Microbiome
spelling doaj.art-89ad7a11ef0742a5a519d6aa774a80aa2022-12-22T00:30:32ZengBMCAnimal Microbiome2524-46712022-06-014111910.1186/s42523-022-00192-xFecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systemsJennifer R. Weinert-Nelson0Amy S. Biddle1Carey A. Williams2Department of Animal Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of DelawareDepartment of Animal Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyAbstract Background Diet is a key driver of equine hindgut microbial community structure and composition. The aim of this study was to characterize shifts in the fecal microbiota of grazing horses during transitions between forage types within integrated warm- (WSG) and cool-season grass (CSG) rotational grazing systems (IRS). Eight mares were randomly assigned to two IRS containing mixed cool-season grass and one of two warm-season grasses: bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] or crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.]. Fecal samples were collected during transitions from CSG to WSG pasture sections (C–W) and WSG to CSG (W–C) on days 0, 2, 4, and 6 following pasture rotation and compared using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results Regardless of IRS or transition (C–W vs. W–C), species richness was greater on day 4 and 6 in comparison to day 0 (P < 0.05). Evenness, however, did not differ by day. Weighted UniFrac also did not differ by day, and the most influential factor impacting β-diversity was the individual horse (R2 ≥ 0.24; P = 0.0001). Random forest modeling was unable to accurately predict days within C–W and W–C, but could predict the individual horse based on microbial composition (accuracy: 0.92 ± 0.05). Only three differentially abundant bacterial co-abundance groups (BCG) were identified across days within all C–W and W–C for both IRS (W ≥ 126). The BCG differing by day for all transitions included amplicon sequence variants (ASV) assigned to bacterial groups with known fibrolytic and butyrate-producing functions including members of Lachnospiraceae, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Anaerovorax the NK4A214 group of Oscillospiraceae, and Sarcina maxima. In comparison, 38 BCG were identified as differentially abundant by horse (W ≥ 704). The ASV in these groups were most commonly assigned to genera associated with degradation of structural carbohydrates included Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, Treponema, Christensenellaceae R-7 group, and the NK4A214 group of Oscillospiraceae. Fecal pH also did not differ by day. Conclusions Overall, these results demonstrated a strong influence of individual horse on the fecal microbial community, particularly on the specific composition of fiber-degraders. The equine fecal microbiota were largely stable across transitions between forages within IRS suggesting that the equine gut microbiota adjusted at the individual level to the subtle dietary changes imposed by these transitions. This adaptive capacity indicates that horses can be managed in IRS without inducing gastrointestinal dysfunction.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-022-00192-xHorse grazingEquine microbiomeEquine foragesWarm-season grasses
spellingShingle Jennifer R. Weinert-Nelson
Amy S. Biddle
Carey A. Williams
Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems
Animal Microbiome
Horse grazing
Equine microbiome
Equine forages
Warm-season grasses
title Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems
title_full Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems
title_fullStr Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems
title_full_unstemmed Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems
title_short Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems
title_sort fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm season and cool season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems
topic Horse grazing
Equine microbiome
Equine forages
Warm-season grasses
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-022-00192-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferrweinertnelson fecalmicrobiomeofhorsestransitioningbetweenwarmseasonandcoolseasongrasspasturewithinintegratedrotationalgrazingsystems
AT amysbiddle fecalmicrobiomeofhorsestransitioningbetweenwarmseasonandcoolseasongrasspasturewithinintegratedrotationalgrazingsystems
AT careyawilliams fecalmicrobiomeofhorsestransitioningbetweenwarmseasonandcoolseasongrasspasturewithinintegratedrotationalgrazingsystems