The effect of prophylactic chemotherapy on treatment outcome of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

Abstract Objective To evaluate whether prophylactic chemotherapy (P-chem) increased the drug resistance rate of postmolar GTN and whether the first-line chemotherapy should be different from P-chem. Methods Postmolar GTN received P-Chem was defined as P-Chem group. Postmolar GTN without P-chem was r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuanyuan Liu, Yaqiong Ye, Xiaodong Cheng, Weiguo Lu, Xing Xie, Xinyu Wang, Xiao Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-01-01
Series:BMC Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02134-w
_version_ 1797958489845268480
author Yuanyuan Liu
Yaqiong Ye
Xiaodong Cheng
Weiguo Lu
Xing Xie
Xinyu Wang
Xiao Li
author_facet Yuanyuan Liu
Yaqiong Ye
Xiaodong Cheng
Weiguo Lu
Xing Xie
Xinyu Wang
Xiao Li
author_sort Yuanyuan Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To evaluate whether prophylactic chemotherapy (P-chem) increased the drug resistance rate of postmolar GTN and whether the first-line chemotherapy should be different from P-chem. Methods Postmolar GTN received P-Chem was defined as P-Chem group. Postmolar GTN without P-chem was randomly selected as control group according to the ratio of 1:3 (P-chem:control) and matched by age for low risk and high risk GTN separately. Results Totally 455 low-risk and 32 high-risk postmolar GTN patients were included. WHO risk score, chemotherapy cycles to achieve hCG normalization and resistant rate were similar between P-chem (27 cases) and control (81 cases) group. Among low-risk GTN patients, interval from hydatidiform mole to GTN was significantly longer in P-chem group than control (44 vs 69 days, P = 0.001). Total chemotherapy cycles and resistant rate were similar between low-risk GTN treated with same agent as P-chem (group A) and alternative agent (group B). But group A needed more chemotherapy cycles to achieve hCG normalization than group B. Conclusions P-chem delayed the time to GTN diagnosis, but didn’t increase risk score or lead to drug resistance of postmolar GTN. Alternative agent different from P-chem had the potential of enhancing chemotherapy response in low- risk postmolar GTN.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T00:20:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-89b22d29347d4c10aeb3f5c628bfb9b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6874
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T00:20:51Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Women's Health
spelling doaj.art-89b22d29347d4c10aeb3f5c628bfb9b02023-01-08T12:19:41ZengBMCBMC Women's Health1472-68742023-01-012311810.1186/s12905-022-02134-wThe effect of prophylactic chemotherapy on treatment outcome of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasiaYuanyuan Liu0Yaqiong Ye1Xiaodong Cheng2Weiguo Lu3Xing Xie4Xinyu Wang5Xiao Li6Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Therapy for Major Gynecological Diseases, Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineAbstract Objective To evaluate whether prophylactic chemotherapy (P-chem) increased the drug resistance rate of postmolar GTN and whether the first-line chemotherapy should be different from P-chem. Methods Postmolar GTN received P-Chem was defined as P-Chem group. Postmolar GTN without P-chem was randomly selected as control group according to the ratio of 1:3 (P-chem:control) and matched by age for low risk and high risk GTN separately. Results Totally 455 low-risk and 32 high-risk postmolar GTN patients were included. WHO risk score, chemotherapy cycles to achieve hCG normalization and resistant rate were similar between P-chem (27 cases) and control (81 cases) group. Among low-risk GTN patients, interval from hydatidiform mole to GTN was significantly longer in P-chem group than control (44 vs 69 days, P = 0.001). Total chemotherapy cycles and resistant rate were similar between low-risk GTN treated with same agent as P-chem (group A) and alternative agent (group B). But group A needed more chemotherapy cycles to achieve hCG normalization than group B. Conclusions P-chem delayed the time to GTN diagnosis, but didn’t increase risk score or lead to drug resistance of postmolar GTN. Alternative agent different from P-chem had the potential of enhancing chemotherapy response in low- risk postmolar GTN.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02134-wHydatidiform moleProphylactic chemotherapyGestational trophoblastic neoplasiaChemotherapy resistance
spellingShingle Yuanyuan Liu
Yaqiong Ye
Xiaodong Cheng
Weiguo Lu
Xing Xie
Xinyu Wang
Xiao Li
The effect of prophylactic chemotherapy on treatment outcome of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
BMC Women's Health
Hydatidiform mole
Prophylactic chemotherapy
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
Chemotherapy resistance
title The effect of prophylactic chemotherapy on treatment outcome of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_full The effect of prophylactic chemotherapy on treatment outcome of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_fullStr The effect of prophylactic chemotherapy on treatment outcome of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_full_unstemmed The effect of prophylactic chemotherapy on treatment outcome of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_short The effect of prophylactic chemotherapy on treatment outcome of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_sort effect of prophylactic chemotherapy on treatment outcome of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
topic Hydatidiform mole
Prophylactic chemotherapy
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
Chemotherapy resistance
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02134-w
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanyuanliu theeffectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT yaqiongye theeffectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT xiaodongcheng theeffectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT weiguolu theeffectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT xingxie theeffectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT xinyuwang theeffectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT xiaoli theeffectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT yuanyuanliu effectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT yaqiongye effectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT xiaodongcheng effectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT weiguolu effectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT xingxie effectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT xinyuwang effectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT xiaoli effectofprophylacticchemotherapyontreatmentoutcomeofpostmolargestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia