Net-Zero Target and Emissions from Land Conversions: A Case Study of Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now Act

Many climate change “solution” plans include net-zero goals, which involve balancing the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) with their removal. Achieving net-zero goals is particularly problematic for soils because they are often excluded from GHG inventories and reduction plans. For examp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philip C. Hutton, Elena A. Mikhailova, Lili Lin, Zhenbang Hao, Hamdi A. Zurqani, Christopher J. Post, Mark A. Schlautman, George B. Shepherd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Geographies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/3/1/3
_version_ 1797611542095593472
author Philip C. Hutton
Elena A. Mikhailova
Lili Lin
Zhenbang Hao
Hamdi A. Zurqani
Christopher J. Post
Mark A. Schlautman
George B. Shepherd
author_facet Philip C. Hutton
Elena A. Mikhailova
Lili Lin
Zhenbang Hao
Hamdi A. Zurqani
Christopher J. Post
Mark A. Schlautman
George B. Shepherd
author_sort Philip C. Hutton
collection DOAJ
description Many climate change “solution” plans include net-zero goals, which involve balancing the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) with their removal. Achieving net-zero goals is particularly problematic for soils because they are often excluded from GHG inventories and reduction plans. For example, Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now Act (Senate Bill 528) put forward the goal of lowering emissions of GHG to 60% under 2006 quantities by 2031 and with a target of net-zero emissions by 2045. To achieve these goals, the state of Maryland (MD) needs to quantify GHG emissions from various sources contributing to the state’s total emissions footprint (EF). Soils are currently excluded from MD’s GHG assessments, which raises a question about how the soil impacts the net-zero goal. This study examines the challenges in meeting net-zero goals using an example of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) as one of the GHG types (net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions). The current study quantified the “realized” social costs of CO<sub>2</sub> (SC-CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions for MD from new land developments in the period from 2001 to 2016 which caused a complete loss of 2.2 × 10<sup>9</sup> kg of total soil carbon (TSC) resulting in $383.8M (where M = million, USD = US dollars). All MD’s counties experienced land developments with various emissions and SC-CO<sub>2</sub> monetary values. Most of the developments, TSC losses, and SC-CO<sub>2</sub> occurred near the existing urban areas of Annapolis and Baltimore City. These emissions need to be accounted for in MD’s GHG emissions reduction plans to achieve a net-zero target. Soils of MD are limited in recarbonization capacity because 64% of the state area is occupied by highly leached Ultisols. Soil recarbonization potential is further reduced by urbanization with Prince George’s, Montgomery, and Frederick counties experiencing the highest increases in developed areas. In addition, projected sea-level rises will impact 17 of MD’s 23 counties. These losses will generate additional social costs because of migration, costs of relocation, and damages to infrastructure. The state of MD has a high proportion of private land ownership (92.4%) and low proportion of public lands, which will limit opportunities for relocation within the state. Net-zero targets are important but meeting these targets without specific and integrative approaches depending on the source and type of emissions may result in failure. These approaches should also focus on the social costs of emissions, which raises the need for a new concept of integrating net-zero emissions and social costs.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T06:29:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-89b26f34a7974003928011530172044e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-7086
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T06:29:14Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Geographies
spelling doaj.art-89b26f34a7974003928011530172044e2023-11-17T11:19:17ZengMDPI AGGeographies2673-70862022-12-0131405910.3390/geographies3010003Net-Zero Target and Emissions from Land Conversions: A Case Study of Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now ActPhilip C. Hutton0Elena A. Mikhailova1Lili Lin2Zhenbang Hao3Hamdi A. Zurqani4Christopher J. Post5Mark A. Schlautman6George B. Shepherd7Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USADepartment of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USADepartment of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, ChinaUniversity Key Lab for Geomatics Technology and Optimized Resources Utilization in Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350002, ChinaUniversity of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Arkansas Forest Resources Center, University of Arkansas at Monticello, Monticello, AR 71655, USADepartment of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USADepartment of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson University, Anderson, SC 29625, USASchool of Law, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USAMany climate change “solution” plans include net-zero goals, which involve balancing the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) with their removal. Achieving net-zero goals is particularly problematic for soils because they are often excluded from GHG inventories and reduction plans. For example, Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now Act (Senate Bill 528) put forward the goal of lowering emissions of GHG to 60% under 2006 quantities by 2031 and with a target of net-zero emissions by 2045. To achieve these goals, the state of Maryland (MD) needs to quantify GHG emissions from various sources contributing to the state’s total emissions footprint (EF). Soils are currently excluded from MD’s GHG assessments, which raises a question about how the soil impacts the net-zero goal. This study examines the challenges in meeting net-zero goals using an example of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) as one of the GHG types (net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions). The current study quantified the “realized” social costs of CO<sub>2</sub> (SC-CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions for MD from new land developments in the period from 2001 to 2016 which caused a complete loss of 2.2 × 10<sup>9</sup> kg of total soil carbon (TSC) resulting in $383.8M (where M = million, USD = US dollars). All MD’s counties experienced land developments with various emissions and SC-CO<sub>2</sub> monetary values. Most of the developments, TSC losses, and SC-CO<sub>2</sub> occurred near the existing urban areas of Annapolis and Baltimore City. These emissions need to be accounted for in MD’s GHG emissions reduction plans to achieve a net-zero target. Soils of MD are limited in recarbonization capacity because 64% of the state area is occupied by highly leached Ultisols. Soil recarbonization potential is further reduced by urbanization with Prince George’s, Montgomery, and Frederick counties experiencing the highest increases in developed areas. In addition, projected sea-level rises will impact 17 of MD’s 23 counties. These losses will generate additional social costs because of migration, costs of relocation, and damages to infrastructure. The state of MD has a high proportion of private land ownership (92.4%) and low proportion of public lands, which will limit opportunities for relocation within the state. Net-zero targets are important but meeting these targets without specific and integrative approaches depending on the source and type of emissions may result in failure. These approaches should also focus on the social costs of emissions, which raises the need for a new concept of integrating net-zero emissions and social costs.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/3/1/3carbonCO<sub>2</sub>changefootprintgoalgreenhouse gas
spellingShingle Philip C. Hutton
Elena A. Mikhailova
Lili Lin
Zhenbang Hao
Hamdi A. Zurqani
Christopher J. Post
Mark A. Schlautman
George B. Shepherd
Net-Zero Target and Emissions from Land Conversions: A Case Study of Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now Act
Geographies
carbon
CO<sub>2</sub>
change
footprint
goal
greenhouse gas
title Net-Zero Target and Emissions from Land Conversions: A Case Study of Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now Act
title_full Net-Zero Target and Emissions from Land Conversions: A Case Study of Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now Act
title_fullStr Net-Zero Target and Emissions from Land Conversions: A Case Study of Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now Act
title_full_unstemmed Net-Zero Target and Emissions from Land Conversions: A Case Study of Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now Act
title_short Net-Zero Target and Emissions from Land Conversions: A Case Study of Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now Act
title_sort net zero target and emissions from land conversions a case study of maryland s climate solutions now act
topic carbon
CO<sub>2</sub>
change
footprint
goal
greenhouse gas
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/3/1/3
work_keys_str_mv AT philipchutton netzerotargetandemissionsfromlandconversionsacasestudyofmarylandsclimatesolutionsnowact
AT elenaamikhailova netzerotargetandemissionsfromlandconversionsacasestudyofmarylandsclimatesolutionsnowact
AT lililin netzerotargetandemissionsfromlandconversionsacasestudyofmarylandsclimatesolutionsnowact
AT zhenbanghao netzerotargetandemissionsfromlandconversionsacasestudyofmarylandsclimatesolutionsnowact
AT hamdiazurqani netzerotargetandemissionsfromlandconversionsacasestudyofmarylandsclimatesolutionsnowact
AT christopherjpost netzerotargetandemissionsfromlandconversionsacasestudyofmarylandsclimatesolutionsnowact
AT markaschlautman netzerotargetandemissionsfromlandconversionsacasestudyofmarylandsclimatesolutionsnowact
AT georgebshepherd netzerotargetandemissionsfromlandconversionsacasestudyofmarylandsclimatesolutionsnowact