Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations

BackgroundReflexive pitch perturbation experiments are commonly used to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying vocal motor control. In these experiments, the fundamental frequency–the acoustic correlate of pitch–of a speech signal is shifted unexpectedly and played back to the speaker via head...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elaine Kearney, Alfonso Nieto-Castañón, Riccardo Falsini, Ayoub Daliri, Elizabeth S. Heller Murray, Dante J. Smith, Frank H. Guenther
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.929687/full
_version_ 1811255606134177792
author Elaine Kearney
Alfonso Nieto-Castañón
Alfonso Nieto-Castañón
Riccardo Falsini
Ayoub Daliri
Elizabeth S. Heller Murray
Dante J. Smith
Frank H. Guenther
Frank H. Guenther
Frank H. Guenther
author_facet Elaine Kearney
Alfonso Nieto-Castañón
Alfonso Nieto-Castañón
Riccardo Falsini
Ayoub Daliri
Elizabeth S. Heller Murray
Dante J. Smith
Frank H. Guenther
Frank H. Guenther
Frank H. Guenther
author_sort Elaine Kearney
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundReflexive pitch perturbation experiments are commonly used to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying vocal motor control. In these experiments, the fundamental frequency–the acoustic correlate of pitch–of a speech signal is shifted unexpectedly and played back to the speaker via headphones in near real-time. In response to the shift, speakers increase or decrease their fundamental frequency in the direction opposing the shift so that their perceived pitch is closer to what they intended. The goal of the current work is to develop a quantitative model of responses to reflexive perturbations that can be interpreted in terms of the physiological mechanisms underlying the response and that captures both group-mean data and individual subject responses.MethodsA model framework was established that allowed the specification of several models based on Proportional-Integral-Derivative and State-Space/Directions Into Velocities of Articulators (DIVA) model classes. The performance of 19 models was compared in fitting experimental data from two published studies. The models were evaluated in terms of their ability to capture both population-level responses and individual differences in sensorimotor control processes.ResultsA three-parameter DIVA model performed best when fitting group-mean data from both studies; this model is equivalent to a single-rate state-space model and a first-order low pass filter model. The same model also provided stable estimates of parameters across samples from individual subject data and performed among the best models to differentiate between subjects. The three parameters correspond to gains in the auditory feedback controller’s response to a perceived error, the delay of this response, and the gain of the somatosensory feedback controller’s “resistance” to this correction. Excellent fits were also obtained from a four-parameter model with an additional auditory velocity error term; this model was better able to capture multi-component reflexive responses seen in some individual subjects.ConclusionOur results demonstrate the stereotyped nature of an individual’s responses to pitch perturbations. Further, we identified a model that captures population responses to pitch perturbations and characterizes individual differences in a stable manner with parameters that relate to underlying motor control capabilities. Future work will evaluate the model in characterizing responses from individuals with communication disorders.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T17:26:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-89b4db5911eb49bf9ecb762e58080af6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T17:26:22Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-89b4db5911eb49bf9ecb762e58080af62022-12-22T03:23:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612022-11-011610.3389/fnhum.2022.929687929687Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbationsElaine Kearney0Alfonso Nieto-Castañón1Alfonso Nieto-Castañón2Riccardo Falsini3Ayoub Daliri4Elizabeth S. Heller Murray5Dante J. Smith6Frank H. Guenther7Frank H. Guenther8Frank H. Guenther9Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United StatesThe McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United StatesDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United StatesCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United StatesDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesGradutate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United StatesThe Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United StatesBackgroundReflexive pitch perturbation experiments are commonly used to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying vocal motor control. In these experiments, the fundamental frequency–the acoustic correlate of pitch–of a speech signal is shifted unexpectedly and played back to the speaker via headphones in near real-time. In response to the shift, speakers increase or decrease their fundamental frequency in the direction opposing the shift so that their perceived pitch is closer to what they intended. The goal of the current work is to develop a quantitative model of responses to reflexive perturbations that can be interpreted in terms of the physiological mechanisms underlying the response and that captures both group-mean data and individual subject responses.MethodsA model framework was established that allowed the specification of several models based on Proportional-Integral-Derivative and State-Space/Directions Into Velocities of Articulators (DIVA) model classes. The performance of 19 models was compared in fitting experimental data from two published studies. The models were evaluated in terms of their ability to capture both population-level responses and individual differences in sensorimotor control processes.ResultsA three-parameter DIVA model performed best when fitting group-mean data from both studies; this model is equivalent to a single-rate state-space model and a first-order low pass filter model. The same model also provided stable estimates of parameters across samples from individual subject data and performed among the best models to differentiate between subjects. The three parameters correspond to gains in the auditory feedback controller’s response to a perceived error, the delay of this response, and the gain of the somatosensory feedback controller’s “resistance” to this correction. Excellent fits were also obtained from a four-parameter model with an additional auditory velocity error term; this model was better able to capture multi-component reflexive responses seen in some individual subjects.ConclusionOur results demonstrate the stereotyped nature of an individual’s responses to pitch perturbations. Further, we identified a model that captures population responses to pitch perturbations and characterizes individual differences in a stable manner with parameters that relate to underlying motor control capabilities. Future work will evaluate the model in characterizing responses from individuals with communication disorders.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.929687/fullcomputational modelingmotor controlspeech productionpitchauditory feedback
spellingShingle Elaine Kearney
Alfonso Nieto-Castañón
Alfonso Nieto-Castañón
Riccardo Falsini
Ayoub Daliri
Elizabeth S. Heller Murray
Dante J. Smith
Frank H. Guenther
Frank H. Guenther
Frank H. Guenther
Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
computational modeling
motor control
speech production
pitch
auditory feedback
title Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations
title_full Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations
title_fullStr Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations
title_full_unstemmed Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations
title_short Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations
title_sort quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations
topic computational modeling
motor control
speech production
pitch
auditory feedback
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.929687/full
work_keys_str_mv AT elainekearney quantitativelycharacterizingreflexiveresponsestopitchperturbations
AT alfonsonietocastanon quantitativelycharacterizingreflexiveresponsestopitchperturbations
AT alfonsonietocastanon quantitativelycharacterizingreflexiveresponsestopitchperturbations
AT riccardofalsini quantitativelycharacterizingreflexiveresponsestopitchperturbations
AT ayoubdaliri quantitativelycharacterizingreflexiveresponsestopitchperturbations
AT elizabethshellermurray quantitativelycharacterizingreflexiveresponsestopitchperturbations
AT dantejsmith quantitativelycharacterizingreflexiveresponsestopitchperturbations
AT frankhguenther quantitativelycharacterizingreflexiveresponsestopitchperturbations
AT frankhguenther quantitativelycharacterizingreflexiveresponsestopitchperturbations
AT frankhguenther quantitativelycharacterizingreflexiveresponsestopitchperturbations