The Effects of Different Degrees of Carbohydrate Restriction and Carbohydrate Replacement on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Humans—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) often differ in their diet composition, which may lead to conflicting results between randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of different degrees of carbohydrate (CHO) restriction on cardiometabolic risk markers in humans. The experimen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eva Fechner, Ellen T.H.C. Smeets, Patrick Schrauwen, Ronald P. Mensink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/4/991
_version_ 1797571603414908928
author Eva Fechner
Ellen T.H.C. Smeets
Patrick Schrauwen
Ronald P. Mensink
author_facet Eva Fechner
Ellen T.H.C. Smeets
Patrick Schrauwen
Ronald P. Mensink
author_sort Eva Fechner
collection DOAJ
description Low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) often differ in their diet composition, which may lead to conflicting results between randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of different degrees of carbohydrate (CHO) restriction on cardiometabolic risk markers in humans. The experimental LCDs of 37 human trials were classified as (1) moderate-low CHO diets (<45–40 E%, <i>n</i> = 13), (2) low CHO diets (<40–30 E%, <i>n</i> = 16), and (3) very-low CHO diets (<30–3 E%; <i>n</i> = 8). Summary estimates of weighted mean differences (WMDs) in selected risk markers were calculated using random-effect meta-analyses. Differences between the LCD groups were assessed with univariate meta-regression analyses. Overall, the LCDs resulted in significant weight loss, reduced diastolic blood pressure BP, and increased total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), without significant differences between the three LCD groups. Higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations were found with the very-low CHO diets compared to the moderate-low CHO diets. Decreases in triacylglycerol (TAG) concentrations were more pronounced with the low and very-low CHO diets, compared to the moderate-low CHO diets. Substitution of CHO by mainly saturated fatty acids (SFAs) increased total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C concentrations. Except for LDL-C and TAGs, effects were not related to the degree of CHO restriction. Potential effects of nutrient exchanges should be considered when following LCDs.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:43:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-89bbd9372f614d679a5248fb3feed47a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6643
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:43:04Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nutrients
spelling doaj.art-89bbd9372f614d679a5248fb3feed47a2023-11-19T20:30:47ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432020-04-0112499110.3390/nu12040991The Effects of Different Degrees of Carbohydrate Restriction and Carbohydrate Replacement on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Humans—A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisEva Fechner0Ellen T.H.C. Smeets1Patrick Schrauwen2Ronald P. Mensink3Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The NetherlandsLow-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) often differ in their diet composition, which may lead to conflicting results between randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of different degrees of carbohydrate (CHO) restriction on cardiometabolic risk markers in humans. The experimental LCDs of 37 human trials were classified as (1) moderate-low CHO diets (<45–40 E%, <i>n</i> = 13), (2) low CHO diets (<40–30 E%, <i>n</i> = 16), and (3) very-low CHO diets (<30–3 E%; <i>n</i> = 8). Summary estimates of weighted mean differences (WMDs) in selected risk markers were calculated using random-effect meta-analyses. Differences between the LCD groups were assessed with univariate meta-regression analyses. Overall, the LCDs resulted in significant weight loss, reduced diastolic blood pressure BP, and increased total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), without significant differences between the three LCD groups. Higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations were found with the very-low CHO diets compared to the moderate-low CHO diets. Decreases in triacylglycerol (TAG) concentrations were more pronounced with the low and very-low CHO diets, compared to the moderate-low CHO diets. Substitution of CHO by mainly saturated fatty acids (SFAs) increased total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C concentrations. Except for LDL-C and TAGs, effects were not related to the degree of CHO restriction. Potential effects of nutrient exchanges should be considered when following LCDs.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/4/991meta-analysisadultsrandomized controlled trialslow-carbohydrate dietsLCDcarbohydrate restriction
spellingShingle Eva Fechner
Ellen T.H.C. Smeets
Patrick Schrauwen
Ronald P. Mensink
The Effects of Different Degrees of Carbohydrate Restriction and Carbohydrate Replacement on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Humans—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nutrients
meta-analysis
adults
randomized controlled trials
low-carbohydrate diets
LCD
carbohydrate restriction
title The Effects of Different Degrees of Carbohydrate Restriction and Carbohydrate Replacement on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Humans—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Effects of Different Degrees of Carbohydrate Restriction and Carbohydrate Replacement on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Humans—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Effects of Different Degrees of Carbohydrate Restriction and Carbohydrate Replacement on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Humans—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Different Degrees of Carbohydrate Restriction and Carbohydrate Replacement on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Humans—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Effects of Different Degrees of Carbohydrate Restriction and Carbohydrate Replacement on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Humans—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effects of different degrees of carbohydrate restriction and carbohydrate replacement on cardiometabolic risk markers in humans a systematic review and meta analysis
topic meta-analysis
adults
randomized controlled trials
low-carbohydrate diets
LCD
carbohydrate restriction
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/4/991
work_keys_str_mv AT evafechner theeffectsofdifferentdegreesofcarbohydraterestrictionandcarbohydratereplacementoncardiometabolicriskmarkersinhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ellenthcsmeets theeffectsofdifferentdegreesofcarbohydraterestrictionandcarbohydratereplacementoncardiometabolicriskmarkersinhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT patrickschrauwen theeffectsofdifferentdegreesofcarbohydraterestrictionandcarbohydratereplacementoncardiometabolicriskmarkersinhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ronaldpmensink theeffectsofdifferentdegreesofcarbohydraterestrictionandcarbohydratereplacementoncardiometabolicriskmarkersinhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT evafechner effectsofdifferentdegreesofcarbohydraterestrictionandcarbohydratereplacementoncardiometabolicriskmarkersinhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ellenthcsmeets effectsofdifferentdegreesofcarbohydraterestrictionandcarbohydratereplacementoncardiometabolicriskmarkersinhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT patrickschrauwen effectsofdifferentdegreesofcarbohydraterestrictionandcarbohydratereplacementoncardiometabolicriskmarkersinhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ronaldpmensink effectsofdifferentdegreesofcarbohydraterestrictionandcarbohydratereplacementoncardiometabolicriskmarkersinhumansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis