Using single impact metrics to assess research in business and economics: why institutions should use multi-criteria systems for assessing research
Purpose – Despite the general recommendation of using a combination of multiple criteria for research assessment and faculty promotion decisions, the raise of quantitative indicators is generating an emerging trend in Business Schools to use single journal impact factors (IFs) as key (unique) driver...
Main Author: | Sergio Olavarrieta |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Emerald Publishing
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2021-0033/full/pdf?title=using-single-impact-metrics-to-assess-research-in-business-and-economics-why-institutions-should-use-multi-criteria-systems-for-assessing-research |
Similar Items
-
Metrics to evaluate implementation scientists in the USA: what matters most?
by: Brenna B. Maddox, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Preparing for tenure and promotion at PUI institutions
by: Leticia R. Vega, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Promotion and Tenure: Application of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, and Scholarship of Engagement Criteria to Health Professions Education
by: Shilpa J. Register, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Research productivity of doctor of physical therapy faculty promoted in the southeastern United States
by: Marissa A. Littman, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Relevance of First-Tier, Peer-Reviewed Journals in the Tenure and Promotion Process at Non-Doctoral Granting Engineering Institutions
by: Amanda S. Florio, et al.
Published: (2012-02-01)