On the MAC/Network/Energy Performance Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Networks: Contrasting MPH, AODV, DSR and ZTR Routing Protocols
Wireless Sensor Networks deliver valuable information for long periods, then it is desirable to have optimum performance, reduced delays, low overhead, and reliable delivery of information. In this work, proposed metrics that influence energy consumption are used for a performance comparison among o...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2014-12-01
|
| Series: | Sensors |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/14/12/22811 |
| _version_ | 1798035002502414336 |
|---|---|
| author | Carolina Del-Valle-Soto Carlos Mex-Perera Aldo Orozco-Lugo Mauricio Lara Giselle M. Galván-Tejada Oscar Olmedo |
| author_facet | Carolina Del-Valle-Soto Carlos Mex-Perera Aldo Orozco-Lugo Mauricio Lara Giselle M. Galván-Tejada Oscar Olmedo |
| author_sort | Carolina Del-Valle-Soto |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Wireless Sensor Networks deliver valuable information for long periods, then it is desirable to have optimum performance, reduced delays, low overhead, and reliable delivery of information. In this work, proposed metrics that influence energy consumption are used for a performance comparison among our proposed routing protocol, called Multi-Parent Hierarchical (MPH), the well-known protocols for sensor networks, Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), and Zigbee Tree Routing (ZTR), all of them working with the IEEE 802.15.4 MAC layer. Results show how some communication metrics affect performance, throughput, reliability and energy consumption. It can be concluded that MPH is an efficient protocol since it reaches the best performance against the other three protocols under evaluation, such as 19.3% reduction of packet retransmissions, 26.9% decrease of overhead, and 41.2% improvement on the capacity of the protocol for recovering the topology from failures with respect to AODV protocol. We implemented and tested MPH in a real network of 99 nodes during ten days and analyzed parameters as number of hops, connectivity and delay, in order to validate our Sensors 2014, 14 22812 simulator and obtain reliable results. Moreover, an energy model of CC2530 chip is proposed and used for simulations of the four aforementioned protocols, showing that MPH has 15.9% reduction of energy consumption with respect to AODV, 13.7% versus DSR, and 5% against ZTR. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:52:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-89cca08fa1ba494aa4ac599e30eb7d54 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1424-8220 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:52:04Z |
| publishDate | 2014-12-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sensors |
| spelling | doaj.art-89cca08fa1ba494aa4ac599e30eb7d542022-12-22T04:03:49ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202014-12-011412228112284710.3390/s141222811s141222811On the MAC/Network/Energy Performance Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Networks: Contrasting MPH, AODV, DSR and ZTR Routing ProtocolsCarolina Del-Valle-Soto0Carlos Mex-Perera1Aldo Orozco-Lugo2Mauricio Lara3Giselle M. Galván-Tejada4Oscar Olmedo5Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada #2501 Sur, Monterrey NL, 64849, MexicoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada #2501 Sur, Monterrey NL, 64849, MexicoCenter for Research and Advanced Studies of IPN, Communications Section, Av. IPN No.2508, Colonia San Pedro Zacatenco, CP. 07360, México D.F., MexicoCenter for Research and Advanced Studies of IPN, Communications Section, Av. IPN No.2508, Colonia San Pedro Zacatenco, CP. 07360, México D.F., MexicoCenter for Research and Advanced Studies of IPN, Communications Section, Av. IPN No.2508, Colonia San Pedro Zacatenco, CP. 07360, México D.F., MexicoCenter for Research and Advanced Studies of IPN, Communications Section, Av. IPN No.2508, Colonia San Pedro Zacatenco, CP. 07360, México D.F., MexicoWireless Sensor Networks deliver valuable information for long periods, then it is desirable to have optimum performance, reduced delays, low overhead, and reliable delivery of information. In this work, proposed metrics that influence energy consumption are used for a performance comparison among our proposed routing protocol, called Multi-Parent Hierarchical (MPH), the well-known protocols for sensor networks, Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), and Zigbee Tree Routing (ZTR), all of them working with the IEEE 802.15.4 MAC layer. Results show how some communication metrics affect performance, throughput, reliability and energy consumption. It can be concluded that MPH is an efficient protocol since it reaches the best performance against the other three protocols under evaluation, such as 19.3% reduction of packet retransmissions, 26.9% decrease of overhead, and 41.2% improvement on the capacity of the protocol for recovering the topology from failures with respect to AODV protocol. We implemented and tested MPH in a real network of 99 nodes during ten days and analyzed parameters as number of hops, connectivity and delay, in order to validate our Sensors 2014, 14 22812 simulator and obtain reliable results. Moreover, an energy model of CC2530 chip is proposed and used for simulations of the four aforementioned protocols, showing that MPH has 15.9% reduction of energy consumption with respect to AODV, 13.7% versus DSR, and 5% against ZTR.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/14/12/22811wireless sensor networks (WSNs)performance metricsenergy consumption |
| spellingShingle | Carolina Del-Valle-Soto Carlos Mex-Perera Aldo Orozco-Lugo Mauricio Lara Giselle M. Galván-Tejada Oscar Olmedo On the MAC/Network/Energy Performance Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Networks: Contrasting MPH, AODV, DSR and ZTR Routing Protocols Sensors wireless sensor networks (WSNs) performance metrics energy consumption |
| title | On the MAC/Network/Energy Performance Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Networks: Contrasting MPH, AODV, DSR and ZTR Routing Protocols |
| title_full | On the MAC/Network/Energy Performance Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Networks: Contrasting MPH, AODV, DSR and ZTR Routing Protocols |
| title_fullStr | On the MAC/Network/Energy Performance Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Networks: Contrasting MPH, AODV, DSR and ZTR Routing Protocols |
| title_full_unstemmed | On the MAC/Network/Energy Performance Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Networks: Contrasting MPH, AODV, DSR and ZTR Routing Protocols |
| title_short | On the MAC/Network/Energy Performance Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Networks: Contrasting MPH, AODV, DSR and ZTR Routing Protocols |
| title_sort | on the mac network energy performance evaluation of wireless sensor networks contrasting mph aodv dsr and ztr routing protocols |
| topic | wireless sensor networks (WSNs) performance metrics energy consumption |
| url | http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/14/12/22811 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carolinadelvallesoto onthemacnetworkenergyperformanceevaluationofwirelesssensornetworkscontrastingmphaodvdsrandztrroutingprotocols AT carlosmexperera onthemacnetworkenergyperformanceevaluationofwirelesssensornetworkscontrastingmphaodvdsrandztrroutingprotocols AT aldoorozcolugo onthemacnetworkenergyperformanceevaluationofwirelesssensornetworkscontrastingmphaodvdsrandztrroutingprotocols AT mauriciolara onthemacnetworkenergyperformanceevaluationofwirelesssensornetworkscontrastingmphaodvdsrandztrroutingprotocols AT gisellemgalvantejada onthemacnetworkenergyperformanceevaluationofwirelesssensornetworkscontrastingmphaodvdsrandztrroutingprotocols AT oscarolmedo onthemacnetworkenergyperformanceevaluationofwirelesssensornetworkscontrastingmphaodvdsrandztrroutingprotocols |