Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study
Abstract Background The Barriers Questionnaire II (BQ-II) was developed to assess barriers to effective pain management. In this study, we aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the newly developed Japanese version of the BQ-II (JBQ-II). Methods This study used a cross-sectional design. The...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | BMC Palliative Care |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12904-020-00606-0 |
| _version_ | 1819001762352201728 |
|---|---|
| author | Naoki Sakakibara Hiroko Komatsu Mikako Takahashi Hideko Yamauchi Teruo Yamauchi Ardith Z. Doorenbos |
| author_facet | Naoki Sakakibara Hiroko Komatsu Mikako Takahashi Hideko Yamauchi Teruo Yamauchi Ardith Z. Doorenbos |
| author_sort | Naoki Sakakibara |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The Barriers Questionnaire II (BQ-II) was developed to assess barriers to effective pain management. In this study, we aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the newly developed Japanese version of the BQ-II (JBQ-II). Methods This study used a cross-sectional design. The study was conducted an ambulatory infusion center for cancer in a general hospital in Tokyo, Japan. Participants were 120 Japanese patients with cancer and 21 Japanese health professionals with experience in pain management. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to calculate reliability. Test–retest reliability was assessed with Spearman’s intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct, criterion-related, and discriminant validity were assessed using information about pain management, daily life, mental health, and subjective health. Results The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90 for the JBQ-II, and all ICCs exceeded 0.70 (P < 0.01). Factor analysis showed the JBQ-II had a virtually identical structure to the BQ-II, and path analysis supported the JBQ-II constructs. The JBQ-II was weakly correlated with poor mental state (r = 0.36, P < 0.01). Patients’ JBQ-II scores were significantly higher than health professionals’ scores. Conclusion The JBQ-II is a valid and reliable measure of patient-related barriers to pain management among Japanese adult patients with cancer. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T22:54:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-89df9ac7675e4fe9951f54ca0b1db0f8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-684X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T22:54:22Z |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Palliative Care |
| spelling | doaj.art-89df9ac7675e4fe9951f54ca0b1db0f82022-12-21T19:24:10ZengBMCBMC Palliative Care1472-684X2020-07-011911910.1186/s12904-020-00606-0Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional studyNaoki Sakakibara0Hiroko Komatsu1Mikako Takahashi2Hideko Yamauchi3Teruo Yamauchi4Ardith Z. Doorenbos5Analysis Section, Center for Cancer Registries, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center JapanJapanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of NursingNursing Department, St. Luke’s International HospitalBreast Surgery, St. Luke’s International HospitalMedical Oncology, St. Luke’s International hospitalDepartment of Biobehavioral Health Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at ChicagoAbstract Background The Barriers Questionnaire II (BQ-II) was developed to assess barriers to effective pain management. In this study, we aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the newly developed Japanese version of the BQ-II (JBQ-II). Methods This study used a cross-sectional design. The study was conducted an ambulatory infusion center for cancer in a general hospital in Tokyo, Japan. Participants were 120 Japanese patients with cancer and 21 Japanese health professionals with experience in pain management. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to calculate reliability. Test–retest reliability was assessed with Spearman’s intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct, criterion-related, and discriminant validity were assessed using information about pain management, daily life, mental health, and subjective health. Results The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90 for the JBQ-II, and all ICCs exceeded 0.70 (P < 0.01). Factor analysis showed the JBQ-II had a virtually identical structure to the BQ-II, and path analysis supported the JBQ-II constructs. The JBQ-II was weakly correlated with poor mental state (r = 0.36, P < 0.01). Patients’ JBQ-II scores were significantly higher than health professionals’ scores. Conclusion The JBQ-II is a valid and reliable measure of patient-related barriers to pain management among Japanese adult patients with cancer.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12904-020-00606-0CancerPain managementBarriersPalliative careAnalgesicsJapan |
| spellingShingle | Naoki Sakakibara Hiroko Komatsu Mikako Takahashi Hideko Yamauchi Teruo Yamauchi Ardith Z. Doorenbos Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study BMC Palliative Care Cancer Pain management Barriers Palliative care Analgesics Japan |
| title | Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study |
| title_full | Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study |
| title_fullStr | Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study |
| title_short | Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study |
| title_sort | validation of the japanese version of the barriers questionnaire ii in cancer pain management a cross sectional study |
| topic | Cancer Pain management Barriers Palliative care Analgesics Japan |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12904-020-00606-0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT naokisakakibara validationofthejapaneseversionofthebarriersquestionnaireiiincancerpainmanagementacrosssectionalstudy AT hirokokomatsu validationofthejapaneseversionofthebarriersquestionnaireiiincancerpainmanagementacrosssectionalstudy AT mikakotakahashi validationofthejapaneseversionofthebarriersquestionnaireiiincancerpainmanagementacrosssectionalstudy AT hidekoyamauchi validationofthejapaneseversionofthebarriersquestionnaireiiincancerpainmanagementacrosssectionalstudy AT teruoyamauchi validationofthejapaneseversionofthebarriersquestionnaireiiincancerpainmanagementacrosssectionalstudy AT ardithzdoorenbos validationofthejapaneseversionofthebarriersquestionnaireiiincancerpainmanagementacrosssectionalstudy |