Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation
The aim of this study was to analyze the refraction and iris capture tendency regarding the fixation position with respect to the intrascleral fixation (ISF) of intraocular lenses. Consecutive patients who underwent ISF 1.5 mm (ISF 1.5, 45 eyes) and 2.0 mm (ISF 2.0, 55 eyes) from the corneal limbus...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1815 |
_version_ | 1797615031666343936 |
---|---|
author | Santaro Noguchi Shunsuke Nakakura Asuka Noguchi Hitoshi Tabuchi |
author_facet | Santaro Noguchi Shunsuke Nakakura Asuka Noguchi Hitoshi Tabuchi |
author_sort | Santaro Noguchi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The aim of this study was to analyze the refraction and iris capture tendency regarding the fixation position with respect to the intrascleral fixation (ISF) of intraocular lenses. Consecutive patients who underwent ISF 1.5 mm (ISF 1.5, 45 eyes) and 2.0 mm (ISF 2.0, 55 eyes) from the corneal limbus with NX60, as well as those who underwent normal phacoemulsification with in-the-bag ZCB00V (ZCB, 50 eyes), were enrolled. The anterior chamber depth (post-op ACD), the estimated ACD when using the SRK/T (post-op ACD—predicted ACD), and the refractive error (post-op MRSE, and the predicted MRSE) were all calculated. In addition, the postoperative iris capture was also investigated. The post-op MRSE—predicted MRSE values were: −0.59, 0.02, and 0.00 D (ISF 1.5, ISF 2.0, and ZCB) (<i>p</i> < 0.05, between ISF 1.5 vs. ISF 2.0 and ZCB); the post-op ACD values were: 4.00, 4.17, and 4.29 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.05, ISF 1.5 vs. ZCB); and the post-op ACD—predicted ACD values were: −2.03, −1.98, and −1.60 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.05, between ZCB vs. ISF 1.5 and ISF 2.0). The iris capture occurred in four eyes with regard to ISF 1.5 and three eyes with ISF 2.0 (<i>p</i> = 0.52). Moreover, ISF 2.0 possessed 0.6D hyperopia and 0.17 mm deeper anterior chamber depth. The refractive error of ISF 2.0 was less than that of ISF 1.5. Lastly, no significant iris capture onset was noted between ISF 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T07:20:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-89f000981c564cd98de3a78864b36610 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2077-0383 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T07:20:43Z |
publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-89f000981c564cd98de3a78864b366102023-11-17T07:58:43ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-02-01125181510.3390/jcm12051815Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral FixationSantaro Noguchi0Shunsuke Nakakura1Asuka Noguchi2Hitoshi Tabuchi3Department of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanThe aim of this study was to analyze the refraction and iris capture tendency regarding the fixation position with respect to the intrascleral fixation (ISF) of intraocular lenses. Consecutive patients who underwent ISF 1.5 mm (ISF 1.5, 45 eyes) and 2.0 mm (ISF 2.0, 55 eyes) from the corneal limbus with NX60, as well as those who underwent normal phacoemulsification with in-the-bag ZCB00V (ZCB, 50 eyes), were enrolled. The anterior chamber depth (post-op ACD), the estimated ACD when using the SRK/T (post-op ACD—predicted ACD), and the refractive error (post-op MRSE, and the predicted MRSE) were all calculated. In addition, the postoperative iris capture was also investigated. The post-op MRSE—predicted MRSE values were: −0.59, 0.02, and 0.00 D (ISF 1.5, ISF 2.0, and ZCB) (<i>p</i> < 0.05, between ISF 1.5 vs. ISF 2.0 and ZCB); the post-op ACD values were: 4.00, 4.17, and 4.29 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.05, ISF 1.5 vs. ZCB); and the post-op ACD—predicted ACD values were: −2.03, −1.98, and −1.60 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.05, between ZCB vs. ISF 1.5 and ISF 2.0). The iris capture occurred in four eyes with regard to ISF 1.5 and three eyes with ISF 2.0 (<i>p</i> = 0.52). Moreover, ISF 2.0 possessed 0.6D hyperopia and 0.17 mm deeper anterior chamber depth. The refractive error of ISF 2.0 was less than that of ISF 1.5. Lastly, no significant iris capture onset was noted between ISF 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1815intrascleral intraocular lens fixationrefractive erroriris capture |
spellingShingle | Santaro Noguchi Shunsuke Nakakura Asuka Noguchi Hitoshi Tabuchi Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation Journal of Clinical Medicine intrascleral intraocular lens fixation refractive error iris capture |
title | Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation |
title_full | Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation |
title_fullStr | Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation |
title_short | Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation |
title_sort | relationship between postoperative anterior chamber depth and refraction based on the haptic fix position in intraocular lens intrascleral fixation |
topic | intrascleral intraocular lens fixation refractive error iris capture |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1815 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santaronoguchi relationshipbetweenpostoperativeanteriorchamberdepthandrefractionbasedonthehapticfixpositioninintraocularlensintrascleralfixation AT shunsukenakakura relationshipbetweenpostoperativeanteriorchamberdepthandrefractionbasedonthehapticfixpositioninintraocularlensintrascleralfixation AT asukanoguchi relationshipbetweenpostoperativeanteriorchamberdepthandrefractionbasedonthehapticfixpositioninintraocularlensintrascleralfixation AT hitoshitabuchi relationshipbetweenpostoperativeanteriorchamberdepthandrefractionbasedonthehapticfixpositioninintraocularlensintrascleralfixation |