Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation

The aim of this study was to analyze the refraction and iris capture tendency regarding the fixation position with respect to the intrascleral fixation (ISF) of intraocular lenses. Consecutive patients who underwent ISF 1.5 mm (ISF 1.5, 45 eyes) and 2.0 mm (ISF 2.0, 55 eyes) from the corneal limbus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Santaro Noguchi, Shunsuke Nakakura, Asuka Noguchi, Hitoshi Tabuchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1815
_version_ 1797615031666343936
author Santaro Noguchi
Shunsuke Nakakura
Asuka Noguchi
Hitoshi Tabuchi
author_facet Santaro Noguchi
Shunsuke Nakakura
Asuka Noguchi
Hitoshi Tabuchi
author_sort Santaro Noguchi
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to analyze the refraction and iris capture tendency regarding the fixation position with respect to the intrascleral fixation (ISF) of intraocular lenses. Consecutive patients who underwent ISF 1.5 mm (ISF 1.5, 45 eyes) and 2.0 mm (ISF 2.0, 55 eyes) from the corneal limbus with NX60, as well as those who underwent normal phacoemulsification with in-the-bag ZCB00V (ZCB, 50 eyes), were enrolled. The anterior chamber depth (post-op ACD), the estimated ACD when using the SRK/T (post-op ACD—predicted ACD), and the refractive error (post-op MRSE, and the predicted MRSE) were all calculated. In addition, the postoperative iris capture was also investigated. The post-op MRSE—predicted MRSE values were: −0.59, 0.02, and 0.00 D (ISF 1.5, ISF 2.0, and ZCB) (<i>p</i> < 0.05, between ISF 1.5 vs. ISF 2.0 and ZCB); the post-op ACD values were: 4.00, 4.17, and 4.29 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.05, ISF 1.5 vs. ZCB); and the post-op ACD—predicted ACD values were: −2.03, −1.98, and −1.60 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.05, between ZCB vs. ISF 1.5 and ISF 2.0). The iris capture occurred in four eyes with regard to ISF 1.5 and three eyes with ISF 2.0 (<i>p</i> = 0.52). Moreover, ISF 2.0 possessed 0.6D hyperopia and 0.17 mm deeper anterior chamber depth. The refractive error of ISF 2.0 was less than that of ISF 1.5. Lastly, no significant iris capture onset was noted between ISF 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:20:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-89f000981c564cd98de3a78864b36610
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:20:43Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-89f000981c564cd98de3a78864b366102023-11-17T07:58:43ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-02-01125181510.3390/jcm12051815Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral FixationSantaro Noguchi0Shunsuke Nakakura1Asuka Noguchi2Hitoshi Tabuchi3Department of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanThe aim of this study was to analyze the refraction and iris capture tendency regarding the fixation position with respect to the intrascleral fixation (ISF) of intraocular lenses. Consecutive patients who underwent ISF 1.5 mm (ISF 1.5, 45 eyes) and 2.0 mm (ISF 2.0, 55 eyes) from the corneal limbus with NX60, as well as those who underwent normal phacoemulsification with in-the-bag ZCB00V (ZCB, 50 eyes), were enrolled. The anterior chamber depth (post-op ACD), the estimated ACD when using the SRK/T (post-op ACD—predicted ACD), and the refractive error (post-op MRSE, and the predicted MRSE) were all calculated. In addition, the postoperative iris capture was also investigated. The post-op MRSE—predicted MRSE values were: −0.59, 0.02, and 0.00 D (ISF 1.5, ISF 2.0, and ZCB) (<i>p</i> < 0.05, between ISF 1.5 vs. ISF 2.0 and ZCB); the post-op ACD values were: 4.00, 4.17, and 4.29 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.05, ISF 1.5 vs. ZCB); and the post-op ACD—predicted ACD values were: −2.03, −1.98, and −1.60 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.05, between ZCB vs. ISF 1.5 and ISF 2.0). The iris capture occurred in four eyes with regard to ISF 1.5 and three eyes with ISF 2.0 (<i>p</i> = 0.52). Moreover, ISF 2.0 possessed 0.6D hyperopia and 0.17 mm deeper anterior chamber depth. The refractive error of ISF 2.0 was less than that of ISF 1.5. Lastly, no significant iris capture onset was noted between ISF 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1815intrascleral intraocular lens fixationrefractive erroriris capture
spellingShingle Santaro Noguchi
Shunsuke Nakakura
Asuka Noguchi
Hitoshi Tabuchi
Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation
Journal of Clinical Medicine
intrascleral intraocular lens fixation
refractive error
iris capture
title Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation
title_full Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation
title_fullStr Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation
title_short Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation
title_sort relationship between postoperative anterior chamber depth and refraction based on the haptic fix position in intraocular lens intrascleral fixation
topic intrascleral intraocular lens fixation
refractive error
iris capture
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1815
work_keys_str_mv AT santaronoguchi relationshipbetweenpostoperativeanteriorchamberdepthandrefractionbasedonthehapticfixpositioninintraocularlensintrascleralfixation
AT shunsukenakakura relationshipbetweenpostoperativeanteriorchamberdepthandrefractionbasedonthehapticfixpositioninintraocularlensintrascleralfixation
AT asukanoguchi relationshipbetweenpostoperativeanteriorchamberdepthandrefractionbasedonthehapticfixpositioninintraocularlensintrascleralfixation
AT hitoshitabuchi relationshipbetweenpostoperativeanteriorchamberdepthandrefractionbasedonthehapticfixpositioninintraocularlensintrascleralfixation