Aortic valve replacement outcome using upper ministernotomy: A prospective comparison of the upper ministernotomy and conventional full median sternotomy
Objectives: The prevalence of aortic valve disease is increasing. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing ministernotomy versus conventional full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Materials and Methods: Between May 2009 and November 2013, 59 consecut...
Main Authors: | Atsushi Tamura, Hiroko Nakata, Tetsuya Sato, Takamichi Yoshizaki |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
GESDAV
2015-04-01
|
Series: | Archives of Clinical and Experimental Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scopemed.org/fulltextpdf.php?mno=159234 |
Similar Items
-
A comparative study between mini versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement
by: Ahmed S Ali, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
J-ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement: a retrospective cohort study
by: Mohammad A. Torky, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Comparative study between right-sided minithoracotomy versus upper partial ministernotomy in isolated mitral valve replacement (early outcome)
by: Hazem G Bakr, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement improves
early recovery and facilitates proper wound healing –
forced propensity score matching design with reference
full sternotomy
by: Marcin Kaczmarczyk, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Comparative study between standard aortic valve replacement and ministernotomy aortic valve replacement
by: Emad Sarawy, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)