National survey of prevention and management of CMV infection in pediatric kidney transplantation in comparison to clinical practice guidelines

BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most frequent opportunistic infections in kidney transplant (KT) recipients and is a risk factor for patient and graft survival after KT. Center-to-center variation, optimal prevention and treatment strategies in pediatric KT are currently unknown. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iona Madden, Véronique Baudouin, Marina Charbit, Bruno Ranchin, Gwenaëlle Roussey, Robert Novo, Florentine Garaix, Stéphane Decramer, Marc Fila, Elodie Merieau, Isabelle Vrillon, Ariane Zaloszyc, Julien Hogan, Jérôme Harambat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.1057352/full
_version_ 1798006043068858368
author Iona Madden
Véronique Baudouin
Marina Charbit
Bruno Ranchin
Gwenaëlle Roussey
Robert Novo
Florentine Garaix
Stéphane Decramer
Marc Fila
Elodie Merieau
Isabelle Vrillon
Ariane Zaloszyc
Julien Hogan
Jérôme Harambat
author_facet Iona Madden
Véronique Baudouin
Marina Charbit
Bruno Ranchin
Gwenaëlle Roussey
Robert Novo
Florentine Garaix
Stéphane Decramer
Marc Fila
Elodie Merieau
Isabelle Vrillon
Ariane Zaloszyc
Julien Hogan
Jérôme Harambat
author_sort Iona Madden
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most frequent opportunistic infections in kidney transplant (KT) recipients and is a risk factor for patient and graft survival after KT. Center-to-center variation, optimal prevention and treatment strategies in pediatric KT are currently unknown. This survey aimed to assess current CMV prevention and treatment strategies used among French pediatric KT centers.MethodsA web-based survey was sent to all 13 French pediatric kidney transplantation centers.ResultsTwelve (92%) centers responded to the survey. All centers used prophylaxis for the donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) group. For R + patients, 54% used prophylaxis, 37% used a pre-emptive strategy. In the low-risk group, D-/R-, 50% used a pre-emptive approach and 50% had no specific prevention strategy. The antiviral used by all centers for prophylaxis was valganciclovir (VGCV). The duration of prophylaxis varied from 3 to 7 months and the duration of viral load monitoring varied from 6 months to indefinitely. No center used a hybrid/sequential approach. For the treatment of CMV DNAemia, VGCV or intravenous GCV were used. Therapeutic drug monitoring of VGCV was performed in 5 centers (42%). Five centers reported drug resistance. Eight centers (67%) administered VGCV during the treatment of acute graft rejection.ConclusionsThere is uniformity in CMV management in some areas among pediatric KT centers in France but not in others which remain diverse and are not up to date with current guidelines, suggesting unnecessary variation which could be reduced with better evidence to inform practice.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:48:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a03648a09b94c63951c62186d9ce4bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:48:42Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-8a03648a09b94c63951c62186d9ce4bd2022-12-22T04:23:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602022-12-011010.3389/fped.2022.10573521057352National survey of prevention and management of CMV infection in pediatric kidney transplantation in comparison to clinical practice guidelinesIona Madden0Véronique Baudouin1Marina Charbit2Bruno Ranchin3Gwenaëlle Roussey4Robert Novo5Florentine Garaix6Stéphane Decramer7Marc Fila8Elodie Merieau9Isabelle Vrillon10Ariane Zaloszyc11Julien Hogan12Jérôme Harambat13Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, FrancePediatric Nephrology Unit, Robert Debré Hospital, APHP, Paris, FrancePediatric Nephrology Unit, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, APHP, Paris, FrancePediatric Nephrology Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, FrancePediatric Nephrology Unit, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, FrancePediatric Nephrology Unit, Lille University Hospital, Lille, FrancePediatric Nephrology Unit, AP-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, FrancePediatric Nephrology Unit, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, FrancePediatric Nephrology Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France0Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France1Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France2Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, FrancePediatric Nephrology Unit, Robert Debré Hospital, APHP, Paris, FrancePediatric Nephrology Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, FranceBackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most frequent opportunistic infections in kidney transplant (KT) recipients and is a risk factor for patient and graft survival after KT. Center-to-center variation, optimal prevention and treatment strategies in pediatric KT are currently unknown. This survey aimed to assess current CMV prevention and treatment strategies used among French pediatric KT centers.MethodsA web-based survey was sent to all 13 French pediatric kidney transplantation centers.ResultsTwelve (92%) centers responded to the survey. All centers used prophylaxis for the donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) group. For R + patients, 54% used prophylaxis, 37% used a pre-emptive strategy. In the low-risk group, D-/R-, 50% used a pre-emptive approach and 50% had no specific prevention strategy. The antiviral used by all centers for prophylaxis was valganciclovir (VGCV). The duration of prophylaxis varied from 3 to 7 months and the duration of viral load monitoring varied from 6 months to indefinitely. No center used a hybrid/sequential approach. For the treatment of CMV DNAemia, VGCV or intravenous GCV were used. Therapeutic drug monitoring of VGCV was performed in 5 centers (42%). Five centers reported drug resistance. Eight centers (67%) administered VGCV during the treatment of acute graft rejection.ConclusionsThere is uniformity in CMV management in some areas among pediatric KT centers in France but not in others which remain diverse and are not up to date with current guidelines, suggesting unnecessary variation which could be reduced with better evidence to inform practice.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.1057352/fullcytomegaloviruspediatric kidney transplantprophylaxissurveyvalganciclovir
spellingShingle Iona Madden
Véronique Baudouin
Marina Charbit
Bruno Ranchin
Gwenaëlle Roussey
Robert Novo
Florentine Garaix
Stéphane Decramer
Marc Fila
Elodie Merieau
Isabelle Vrillon
Ariane Zaloszyc
Julien Hogan
Jérôme Harambat
National survey of prevention and management of CMV infection in pediatric kidney transplantation in comparison to clinical practice guidelines
Frontiers in Pediatrics
cytomegalovirus
pediatric kidney transplant
prophylaxis
survey
valganciclovir
title National survey of prevention and management of CMV infection in pediatric kidney transplantation in comparison to clinical practice guidelines
title_full National survey of prevention and management of CMV infection in pediatric kidney transplantation in comparison to clinical practice guidelines
title_fullStr National survey of prevention and management of CMV infection in pediatric kidney transplantation in comparison to clinical practice guidelines
title_full_unstemmed National survey of prevention and management of CMV infection in pediatric kidney transplantation in comparison to clinical practice guidelines
title_short National survey of prevention and management of CMV infection in pediatric kidney transplantation in comparison to clinical practice guidelines
title_sort national survey of prevention and management of cmv infection in pediatric kidney transplantation in comparison to clinical practice guidelines
topic cytomegalovirus
pediatric kidney transplant
prophylaxis
survey
valganciclovir
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.1057352/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ionamadden nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT veroniquebaudouin nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT marinacharbit nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT brunoranchin nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT gwenaelleroussey nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT robertnovo nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT florentinegaraix nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT stephanedecramer nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT marcfila nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT elodiemerieau nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT isabellevrillon nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT arianezaloszyc nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT julienhogan nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT jeromeharambat nationalsurveyofpreventionandmanagementofcmvinfectioninpediatrickidneytransplantationincomparisontoclinicalpracticeguidelines