Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia

Abstract Objectives Supportive care needs survey short form has a total of 34 items that have 5 domains that measure the unmet needs of cancer patients. It is important to validate this tool since there are differences in culture, geographic areas, and clinical care service which influence patients’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsion Afework, Abigiya Wondimagegnehu, Natnael Alemayehu, Eva Johanna Kantelhardt, Adamu Addissie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06512-2
_version_ 1819101267830505472
author Tsion Afework
Abigiya Wondimagegnehu
Natnael Alemayehu
Eva Johanna Kantelhardt
Adamu Addissie
author_facet Tsion Afework
Abigiya Wondimagegnehu
Natnael Alemayehu
Eva Johanna Kantelhardt
Adamu Addissie
author_sort Tsion Afework
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Supportive care needs survey short form has a total of 34 items that have 5 domains that measure the unmet needs of cancer patients. It is important to validate this tool since there are differences in culture, geographic areas, and clinical care service which influence patients’ needs. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the construct validity and reliability of the tool. Methods The study was conducted among 170 cancer patients from April 1st to 30th 2019 in Hawassa hospital, South Ethiopia. Confirmatory factor analysis was done using fit indices. Convergent and discriminant validity was evaluated using average variance extracted and maximum shared variance respectively. Known group validity was checked using the Mann-Whitney U test. The reliability of the instrument was examined using Cronbach’s alpha. Results Domains except for health system and information, and patient care and support maintained convergent and divergent validity. The remaining validity was maintained after removing items that were redundant and double loading. The average variance extracted of domains varied from 0.52–0.81. The Square of correlation between constructs was lower than the average variance extracted for the constructs. The tool had reliability r = 0.932. The root mean square error of approximation was 0.057, comparative fit index 0.954, and the other fit indices were also indicating a good fit. Known groups difference was seen by age and type of treatment taken across the different domains. Conclusion After the health system and information, and patient care, and support domain validity issues were corrected by removing 8 items, the reduced tool was found to be a valid and reliable tool. The validated tool will be valuable if included in routine cancer care in our clinical settings.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:15:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a11dd0d146b4f85b73351e22d068d1b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:15:58Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-8a11dd0d146b4f85b73351e22d068d1b2022-12-21T18:43:52ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-05-0121111010.1186/s12913-021-06512-2Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in EthiopiaTsion Afework0Abigiya Wondimagegnehu1Natnael Alemayehu2Eva Johanna Kantelhardt3Adamu Addissie4School of Public Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, Addis Ababa UniversitySchool of Public Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, Addis Ababa UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Palliative Care Unit, Hawassa UniversityInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin-Luther-UniversitySchool of Public Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, Addis Ababa UniversityAbstract Objectives Supportive care needs survey short form has a total of 34 items that have 5 domains that measure the unmet needs of cancer patients. It is important to validate this tool since there are differences in culture, geographic areas, and clinical care service which influence patients’ needs. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the construct validity and reliability of the tool. Methods The study was conducted among 170 cancer patients from April 1st to 30th 2019 in Hawassa hospital, South Ethiopia. Confirmatory factor analysis was done using fit indices. Convergent and discriminant validity was evaluated using average variance extracted and maximum shared variance respectively. Known group validity was checked using the Mann-Whitney U test. The reliability of the instrument was examined using Cronbach’s alpha. Results Domains except for health system and information, and patient care and support maintained convergent and divergent validity. The remaining validity was maintained after removing items that were redundant and double loading. The average variance extracted of domains varied from 0.52–0.81. The Square of correlation between constructs was lower than the average variance extracted for the constructs. The tool had reliability r = 0.932. The root mean square error of approximation was 0.057, comparative fit index 0.954, and the other fit indices were also indicating a good fit. Known groups difference was seen by age and type of treatment taken across the different domains. Conclusion After the health system and information, and patient care, and support domain validity issues were corrected by removing 8 items, the reduced tool was found to be a valid and reliable tool. The validated tool will be valuable if included in routine cancer care in our clinical settings.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06512-2Convergent validityConfirmatory factor analysisDiscriminant validityEthiopiaSupportive care needsSCNS-34
spellingShingle Tsion Afework
Abigiya Wondimagegnehu
Natnael Alemayehu
Eva Johanna Kantelhardt
Adamu Addissie
Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
BMC Health Services Research
Convergent validity
Confirmatory factor analysis
Discriminant validity
Ethiopia
Supportive care needs
SCNS-34
title Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title_full Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title_short Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
title_sort validity and reliability of the amharic version of supportive care needs survey short form 34 among cancer patients in ethiopia
topic Convergent validity
Confirmatory factor analysis
Discriminant validity
Ethiopia
Supportive care needs
SCNS-34
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06512-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tsionafework validityandreliabilityoftheamharicversionofsupportivecareneedssurveyshortform34amongcancerpatientsinethiopia
AT abigiyawondimagegnehu validityandreliabilityoftheamharicversionofsupportivecareneedssurveyshortform34amongcancerpatientsinethiopia
AT natnaelalemayehu validityandreliabilityoftheamharicversionofsupportivecareneedssurveyshortform34amongcancerpatientsinethiopia
AT evajohannakantelhardt validityandreliabilityoftheamharicversionofsupportivecareneedssurveyshortform34amongcancerpatientsinethiopia
AT adamuaddissie validityandreliabilityoftheamharicversionofsupportivecareneedssurveyshortform34amongcancerpatientsinethiopia