Direct and indirect impacts of synthetic biology on biodiversity conservation

Summary: The world’s biodiversity is in crisis. Synthetic biology has the potential to transform biodiversity conservation, both directly and indirectly, in ways that are negative and positive. However, applying these biotechnology tools to environmental questions is fraught with uncertainty and cou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas B.W. Macfarlane, Jonathan Adams, Elizabeth L. Bennett, Thomas M. Brooks, Jason A. Delborne, Hilde Eggermont, Drew Endy, Kevin M. Esvelt, Bartlomiej Kolodziejczyk, Todd Kuiken, Maria Julia Oliva, Sonia Peña Moreno, Lydia Slobodian, Risa B. Smith, Delphine Thizy, Daniel M. Tompkins, Wei Wei, Kent H. Redford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-11-01
Series:iScience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222016959
Description
Summary:Summary: The world’s biodiversity is in crisis. Synthetic biology has the potential to transform biodiversity conservation, both directly and indirectly, in ways that are negative and positive. However, applying these biotechnology tools to environmental questions is fraught with uncertainty and could harm cultures, rights, livelihoods, and nature. Decisions about whether or not to use synthetic biology for conservation should be understood alongside the reality of ongoing biodiversity loss. In 2022, the 196 Parties to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity are negotiating the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework that will guide action by governments and other stakeholders for the next decade to conserve the worlds’ biodiversity. To date, synthetic biologists, conservationists, and policy makers have operated in isolation. At this critical time, this review brings these diverse perspectives together and emerges out of the need for a balanced and inclusive examination of the potential application of these technologies to biodiversity conservation.
ISSN:2589-0042