Assessing the clinical utility of protein structural analysis in genomic variant classification: experiences from a diagnostic laboratory
Abstract Background The widespread clinical application of genome-wide sequencing has resulted in many new diagnoses for rare genetic conditions, but testing regularly identifies variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The remarkable rise in the amount of genomic data has been paralleled by a rise...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-07-01
|
Series: | Genome Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01082-2 |
_version_ | 1818509754052378624 |
---|---|
author | Richard C. Caswell Adam C. Gunning Martina M. Owens Sian Ellard Caroline F. Wright |
author_facet | Richard C. Caswell Adam C. Gunning Martina M. Owens Sian Ellard Caroline F. Wright |
author_sort | Richard C. Caswell |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The widespread clinical application of genome-wide sequencing has resulted in many new diagnoses for rare genetic conditions, but testing regularly identifies variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The remarkable rise in the amount of genomic data has been paralleled by a rise in the number of protein structures that are now publicly available, which may have clinical utility for the interpretation of missense and in-frame insertions or deletions. Methods Within a UK National Health Service genomic medicine diagnostic laboratory, we investigated the number of VUS over a 5-year period that were evaluated using protein structural analysis and how often this analysis aided variant classification. Results We found 99 novel missense and in-frame variants across 67 genes that were initially classified as VUS by our diagnostic laboratory using standard variant classification guidelines and for which further analysis of protein structure was requested. Evidence from protein structural analysis was used in the re-assessment of 64 variants, of which 47 were subsequently reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic and 17 remained as VUS. We identified several case studies where protein structural analysis aided variant interpretation by predicting disease mechanisms that were consistent with the observed phenotypes, including loss-of-function through thermodynamic destabilisation or disruption of ligand binding, and gain-of-function through de-repression or escape from proteasomal degradation. Conclusions We have shown that using in silico protein structural analysis can aid classification of VUS and give insights into the mechanisms of pathogenicity. Based on our experience, we propose a generic evidence-based workflow for incorporating protein structural information into diagnostic practice to facilitate variant classification. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T22:49:44Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8a18d4fa39a84867a269df47a7e78eaa |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1756-994X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T22:49:44Z |
publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Genome Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-8a18d4fa39a84867a269df47a7e78eaa2022-12-22T01:30:27ZengBMCGenome Medicine1756-994X2022-07-0114111610.1186/s13073-022-01082-2Assessing the clinical utility of protein structural analysis in genomic variant classification: experiences from a diagnostic laboratoryRichard C. Caswell0Adam C. Gunning1Martina M. Owens2Sian Ellard3Caroline F. Wright4Exeter Genomics Laboratory, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustExeter Genomics Laboratory, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustExeter Genomics Laboratory, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustExeter Genomics Laboratory, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter School of MedicineAbstract Background The widespread clinical application of genome-wide sequencing has resulted in many new diagnoses for rare genetic conditions, but testing regularly identifies variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The remarkable rise in the amount of genomic data has been paralleled by a rise in the number of protein structures that are now publicly available, which may have clinical utility for the interpretation of missense and in-frame insertions or deletions. Methods Within a UK National Health Service genomic medicine diagnostic laboratory, we investigated the number of VUS over a 5-year period that were evaluated using protein structural analysis and how often this analysis aided variant classification. Results We found 99 novel missense and in-frame variants across 67 genes that were initially classified as VUS by our diagnostic laboratory using standard variant classification guidelines and for which further analysis of protein structure was requested. Evidence from protein structural analysis was used in the re-assessment of 64 variants, of which 47 were subsequently reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic and 17 remained as VUS. We identified several case studies where protein structural analysis aided variant interpretation by predicting disease mechanisms that were consistent with the observed phenotypes, including loss-of-function through thermodynamic destabilisation or disruption of ligand binding, and gain-of-function through de-repression or escape from proteasomal degradation. Conclusions We have shown that using in silico protein structural analysis can aid classification of VUS and give insights into the mechanisms of pathogenicity. Based on our experience, we propose a generic evidence-based workflow for incorporating protein structural information into diagnostic practice to facilitate variant classification.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01082-2Variant classificationVariant interpretationMissense variantPathogenicityPredictionModelling |
spellingShingle | Richard C. Caswell Adam C. Gunning Martina M. Owens Sian Ellard Caroline F. Wright Assessing the clinical utility of protein structural analysis in genomic variant classification: experiences from a diagnostic laboratory Genome Medicine Variant classification Variant interpretation Missense variant Pathogenicity Prediction Modelling |
title | Assessing the clinical utility of protein structural analysis in genomic variant classification: experiences from a diagnostic laboratory |
title_full | Assessing the clinical utility of protein structural analysis in genomic variant classification: experiences from a diagnostic laboratory |
title_fullStr | Assessing the clinical utility of protein structural analysis in genomic variant classification: experiences from a diagnostic laboratory |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the clinical utility of protein structural analysis in genomic variant classification: experiences from a diagnostic laboratory |
title_short | Assessing the clinical utility of protein structural analysis in genomic variant classification: experiences from a diagnostic laboratory |
title_sort | assessing the clinical utility of protein structural analysis in genomic variant classification experiences from a diagnostic laboratory |
topic | Variant classification Variant interpretation Missense variant Pathogenicity Prediction Modelling |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01082-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richardccaswell assessingtheclinicalutilityofproteinstructuralanalysisingenomicvariantclassificationexperiencesfromadiagnosticlaboratory AT adamcgunning assessingtheclinicalutilityofproteinstructuralanalysisingenomicvariantclassificationexperiencesfromadiagnosticlaboratory AT martinamowens assessingtheclinicalutilityofproteinstructuralanalysisingenomicvariantclassificationexperiencesfromadiagnosticlaboratory AT sianellard assessingtheclinicalutilityofproteinstructuralanalysisingenomicvariantclassificationexperiencesfromadiagnosticlaboratory AT carolinefwright assessingtheclinicalutilityofproteinstructuralanalysisingenomicvariantclassificationexperiencesfromadiagnosticlaboratory |