Source Camera Identification Techniques: A Survey

The successful investigation and prosecution of significant crimes, including child pornography, insurance fraud, movie piracy, traffic monitoring, and scientific fraud, hinge largely on the availability of solid evidence to establish the case beyond any reasonable doubt. When dealing with digital i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chijioke Emeka Nwokeji, Akbar Sheikh-Akbari, Anatoliy Gorbenko, Iosif Mporas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2313-433X/10/2/31
_version_ 1797297815227990016
author Chijioke Emeka Nwokeji
Akbar Sheikh-Akbari
Anatoliy Gorbenko
Iosif Mporas
author_facet Chijioke Emeka Nwokeji
Akbar Sheikh-Akbari
Anatoliy Gorbenko
Iosif Mporas
author_sort Chijioke Emeka Nwokeji
collection DOAJ
description The successful investigation and prosecution of significant crimes, including child pornography, insurance fraud, movie piracy, traffic monitoring, and scientific fraud, hinge largely on the availability of solid evidence to establish the case beyond any reasonable doubt. When dealing with digital images/videos as evidence in such investigations, there is a critical need to conclusively prove the source camera/device of the questioned image. Extensive research has been conducted in the past decade to address this requirement, resulting in various methods categorized into brand, model, or individual image source camera identification techniques. This paper presents a survey of all those existing methods found in the literature. It thoroughly examines the efficacy of these existing techniques for identifying the source camera of images, utilizing both intrinsic hardware artifacts such as sensor pattern noise and lens optical distortion, and software artifacts like color filter array and auto white balancing. The investigation aims to discern the strengths and weaknesses of these techniques. The paper provides publicly available benchmark image datasets and assessment criteria used to measure the performance of those different methods, facilitating a comprehensive comparison of existing approaches. In conclusion, the paper outlines directions for future research in the field of source camera identification.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:26:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a1c541a4ca54c92a9efd25a8dd9bb5d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-433X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:26:47Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Imaging
spelling doaj.art-8a1c541a4ca54c92a9efd25a8dd9bb5d2024-02-23T15:22:44ZengMDPI AGJournal of Imaging2313-433X2024-01-011023110.3390/jimaging10020031Source Camera Identification Techniques: A SurveyChijioke Emeka Nwokeji0Akbar Sheikh-Akbari1Anatoliy Gorbenko2Iosif Mporas3School of Built Environment, Engineering, and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QR, UKSchool of Built Environment, Engineering, and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QR, UKSchool of Built Environment, Engineering, and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS6 3QR, UKSchool of Physics, Engineering & Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UKThe successful investigation and prosecution of significant crimes, including child pornography, insurance fraud, movie piracy, traffic monitoring, and scientific fraud, hinge largely on the availability of solid evidence to establish the case beyond any reasonable doubt. When dealing with digital images/videos as evidence in such investigations, there is a critical need to conclusively prove the source camera/device of the questioned image. Extensive research has been conducted in the past decade to address this requirement, resulting in various methods categorized into brand, model, or individual image source camera identification techniques. This paper presents a survey of all those existing methods found in the literature. It thoroughly examines the efficacy of these existing techniques for identifying the source camera of images, utilizing both intrinsic hardware artifacts such as sensor pattern noise and lens optical distortion, and software artifacts like color filter array and auto white balancing. The investigation aims to discern the strengths and weaknesses of these techniques. The paper provides publicly available benchmark image datasets and assessment criteria used to measure the performance of those different methods, facilitating a comprehensive comparison of existing approaches. In conclusion, the paper outlines directions for future research in the field of source camera identification.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-433X/10/2/31source camera identificationcamera brand source identificationcamera model source identificationsensor pattern noiseimage lens optical distortioncamera colour filter array
spellingShingle Chijioke Emeka Nwokeji
Akbar Sheikh-Akbari
Anatoliy Gorbenko
Iosif Mporas
Source Camera Identification Techniques: A Survey
Journal of Imaging
source camera identification
camera brand source identification
camera model source identification
sensor pattern noise
image lens optical distortion
camera colour filter array
title Source Camera Identification Techniques: A Survey
title_full Source Camera Identification Techniques: A Survey
title_fullStr Source Camera Identification Techniques: A Survey
title_full_unstemmed Source Camera Identification Techniques: A Survey
title_short Source Camera Identification Techniques: A Survey
title_sort source camera identification techniques a survey
topic source camera identification
camera brand source identification
camera model source identification
sensor pattern noise
image lens optical distortion
camera colour filter array
url https://www.mdpi.com/2313-433X/10/2/31
work_keys_str_mv AT chijiokeemekanwokeji sourcecameraidentificationtechniquesasurvey
AT akbarsheikhakbari sourcecameraidentificationtechniquesasurvey
AT anatoliygorbenko sourcecameraidentificationtechniquesasurvey
AT iosifmporas sourcecameraidentificationtechniquesasurvey