Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth

Background: Glass ionomer cements that form an inevitable part of pediatric restorative dentistry are inherently sensitive to moisture. The influence of different drying techniques on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer cements to primary teeth dentin has not been established. Aims: The purpose...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sherin C Jose, Ektah Khosla, K Korath Abraham, Arun Roy James, Elza Thenumkal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2019;volume=37;issue=2;spage=127;epage=132;aulast=Jose
_version_ 1818209599666257920
author Sherin C Jose
Ektah Khosla
K Korath Abraham
Arun Roy James
Elza Thenumkal
author_facet Sherin C Jose
Ektah Khosla
K Korath Abraham
Arun Roy James
Elza Thenumkal
author_sort Sherin C Jose
collection DOAJ
description Background: Glass ionomer cements that form an inevitable part of pediatric restorative dentistry are inherently sensitive to moisture. The influence of different drying techniques on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer cements to primary teeth dentin has not been established. Aims: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of different drying methods for different drying time periods on the shear bond strength of GC Fuji IX to primary tooth dentine. Subjects and Methods: A total of 135 caries-free primary teeth were selected and ground to a flat dentinal surface. Specimens were randomly divided into three groups – air dry, blot dry, and suction dry of 45 specimens each. Of these, 15 specimens each were dried for 2 s, 5 s, and 10 s. GC Fuji IX was condensed into Teflon molds, and the specimens were subjected to shear bond strength testing. Results: The mean shear bond strength values for the different time intervals were analyzed with analysis of variance test. In the air-dry group, the maximum shear bond strength values were obtained when the specimens were dried for 5 s and the least when dried for 2 s (P = 0.00). In the blot-dry and suction-dry groups, the highest values were obtained when the specimens were dried for 10 s and least for 2 s (P = 0.039 and 0.000, respectively). Conclusions:Among the three drying methods employed in the study, the maximum shear bond strength of the glass ionomer restoration was observed in the air-dry group.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:03:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8a2218481d8f4beb910f242c411785d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-4388
1998-3905
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:03:17Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
spelling doaj.art-8a2218481d8f4beb910f242c411785d32022-12-22T00:37:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052019-01-0137212713210.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_337_18Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teethSherin C JoseEktah KhoslaK Korath AbrahamArun Roy JamesElza ThenumkalBackground: Glass ionomer cements that form an inevitable part of pediatric restorative dentistry are inherently sensitive to moisture. The influence of different drying techniques on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer cements to primary teeth dentin has not been established. Aims: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of different drying methods for different drying time periods on the shear bond strength of GC Fuji IX to primary tooth dentine. Subjects and Methods: A total of 135 caries-free primary teeth were selected and ground to a flat dentinal surface. Specimens were randomly divided into three groups – air dry, blot dry, and suction dry of 45 specimens each. Of these, 15 specimens each were dried for 2 s, 5 s, and 10 s. GC Fuji IX was condensed into Teflon molds, and the specimens were subjected to shear bond strength testing. Results: The mean shear bond strength values for the different time intervals were analyzed with analysis of variance test. In the air-dry group, the maximum shear bond strength values were obtained when the specimens were dried for 5 s and the least when dried for 2 s (P = 0.00). In the blot-dry and suction-dry groups, the highest values were obtained when the specimens were dried for 10 s and least for 2 s (P = 0.039 and 0.000, respectively). Conclusions:Among the three drying methods employed in the study, the maximum shear bond strength of the glass ionomer restoration was observed in the air-dry group.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2019;volume=37;issue=2;spage=127;epage=132;aulast=JoseAdhesivenessglass ionomer cementshear strength
spellingShingle Sherin C Jose
Ektah Khosla
K Korath Abraham
Arun Roy James
Elza Thenumkal
Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Adhesiveness
glass ionomer cement
shear strength
title Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth
title_full Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth
title_fullStr Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth
title_short Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth
title_sort effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth
topic Adhesiveness
glass ionomer cement
shear strength
url http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2019;volume=37;issue=2;spage=127;epage=132;aulast=Jose
work_keys_str_mv AT sherincjose effectsofdifferentdentinaldryingmethodsontheadhesionofglassionomerrestorationstoprimaryteeth
AT ektahkhosla effectsofdifferentdentinaldryingmethodsontheadhesionofglassionomerrestorationstoprimaryteeth
AT kkorathabraham effectsofdifferentdentinaldryingmethodsontheadhesionofglassionomerrestorationstoprimaryteeth
AT arunroyjames effectsofdifferentdentinaldryingmethodsontheadhesionofglassionomerrestorationstoprimaryteeth
AT elzathenumkal effectsofdifferentdentinaldryingmethodsontheadhesionofglassionomerrestorationstoprimaryteeth