Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth
Background: Glass ionomer cements that form an inevitable part of pediatric restorative dentistry are inherently sensitive to moisture. The influence of different drying techniques on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer cements to primary teeth dentin has not been established. Aims: The purpose...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2019;volume=37;issue=2;spage=127;epage=132;aulast=Jose |
_version_ | 1818209599666257920 |
---|---|
author | Sherin C Jose Ektah Khosla K Korath Abraham Arun Roy James Elza Thenumkal |
author_facet | Sherin C Jose Ektah Khosla K Korath Abraham Arun Roy James Elza Thenumkal |
author_sort | Sherin C Jose |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Glass ionomer cements that form an inevitable part of pediatric restorative dentistry are inherently sensitive to moisture. The influence of different drying techniques on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer cements to primary teeth dentin has not been established. Aims: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of different drying methods for different drying time periods on the shear bond strength of GC Fuji IX to primary tooth dentine. Subjects and Methods: A total of 135 caries-free primary teeth were selected and ground to a flat dentinal surface. Specimens were randomly divided into three groups – air dry, blot dry, and suction dry of 45 specimens each. Of these, 15 specimens each were dried for 2 s, 5 s, and 10 s. GC Fuji IX was condensed into Teflon molds, and the specimens were subjected to shear bond strength testing. Results: The mean shear bond strength values for the different time intervals were analyzed with analysis of variance test. In the air-dry group, the maximum shear bond strength values were obtained when the specimens were dried for 5 s and the least when dried for 2 s (P = 0.00). In the blot-dry and suction-dry groups, the highest values were obtained when the specimens were dried for 10 s and least for 2 s (P = 0.039 and 0.000, respectively). Conclusions:Among the three drying methods employed in the study, the maximum shear bond strength of the glass ionomer restoration was observed in the air-dry group. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T05:03:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8a2218481d8f4beb910f242c411785d3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0970-4388 1998-3905 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T05:03:17Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
spelling | doaj.art-8a2218481d8f4beb910f242c411785d32022-12-22T00:37:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052019-01-0137212713210.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_337_18Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teethSherin C JoseEktah KhoslaK Korath AbrahamArun Roy JamesElza ThenumkalBackground: Glass ionomer cements that form an inevitable part of pediatric restorative dentistry are inherently sensitive to moisture. The influence of different drying techniques on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer cements to primary teeth dentin has not been established. Aims: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of different drying methods for different drying time periods on the shear bond strength of GC Fuji IX to primary tooth dentine. Subjects and Methods: A total of 135 caries-free primary teeth were selected and ground to a flat dentinal surface. Specimens were randomly divided into three groups – air dry, blot dry, and suction dry of 45 specimens each. Of these, 15 specimens each were dried for 2 s, 5 s, and 10 s. GC Fuji IX was condensed into Teflon molds, and the specimens were subjected to shear bond strength testing. Results: The mean shear bond strength values for the different time intervals were analyzed with analysis of variance test. In the air-dry group, the maximum shear bond strength values were obtained when the specimens were dried for 5 s and the least when dried for 2 s (P = 0.00). In the blot-dry and suction-dry groups, the highest values were obtained when the specimens were dried for 10 s and least for 2 s (P = 0.039 and 0.000, respectively). Conclusions:Among the three drying methods employed in the study, the maximum shear bond strength of the glass ionomer restoration was observed in the air-dry group.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2019;volume=37;issue=2;spage=127;epage=132;aulast=JoseAdhesivenessglass ionomer cementshear strength |
spellingShingle | Sherin C Jose Ektah Khosla K Korath Abraham Arun Roy James Elza Thenumkal Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Adhesiveness glass ionomer cement shear strength |
title | Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth |
title_full | Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth |
title_fullStr | Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth |
title_short | Effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth |
title_sort | effects of different dentinal drying methods on the adhesion of glass ionomer restorations to primary teeth |
topic | Adhesiveness glass ionomer cement shear strength |
url | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2019;volume=37;issue=2;spage=127;epage=132;aulast=Jose |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sherincjose effectsofdifferentdentinaldryingmethodsontheadhesionofglassionomerrestorationstoprimaryteeth AT ektahkhosla effectsofdifferentdentinaldryingmethodsontheadhesionofglassionomerrestorationstoprimaryteeth AT kkorathabraham effectsofdifferentdentinaldryingmethodsontheadhesionofglassionomerrestorationstoprimaryteeth AT arunroyjames effectsofdifferentdentinaldryingmethodsontheadhesionofglassionomerrestorationstoprimaryteeth AT elzathenumkal effectsofdifferentdentinaldryingmethodsontheadhesionofglassionomerrestorationstoprimaryteeth |